Literature DB >> 33413147

Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations.

Fahima Dossa1,2, Olivia Megetto3, Mafo Yakubu3, David D Q Zhang4,5, Nancy N Baxter5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedation is commonly used in gastrointestinal endoscopy; however, considerable variability in sedation practices has been reported. The objective of this review was to identify and synthesize existing recommendations on sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed guidelines and position statements identified through a search of PubMed, guidelines databases, and websites of relevant professional associations from January 1, 2005 to May 10, 2019. We included English-language guidelines/position statements with recommendations relating to sedation for adults undergoing routine gastrointestinal endoscopy. Documents with guidance only for complex endoscopic procedures were excluded. We extracted and synthesized recommendations relating to: 1) choice of sedatives, 2) sedation administration, 3) personnel responsible for monitoring sedated patients, 4) skills and training of individuals involved in sedation, and 5) equipment required for monitoring sedated patients. We assessed the quality of included documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.
RESULTS: We identified 19 guidelines and 7 position statements meeting inclusion criteria. Documents generally agreed that a single, trained registered nurse can administer moderate sedation, monitor the patient, and assist with brief, interruptible tasks. Documents also agreed on the routine use of pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitoring during endoscopy. However, recommendations relating to the drugs to be used for sedation, the healthcare personnel capable of administering propofol and monitoring patients sedated with propofol, and the need for capnography when monitoring sedated patients varied. Only 9 documents provided a grade or level of evidence in support of their recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for sedation practices in routine gastrointestinal endoscopy differ across guidelines/position statements and often lack supporting evidence with potential implications for patient safety and procedural efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy, digestive system; Guideline; Sedatives

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413147      PMCID: PMC7792218          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


  41 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Steven E Hanna; Peter Littlejohns; Julie Makarski; Louise Zitzelsberger
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OGGH)--guidelines on sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  F Schreiber
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Lawrence B Cohen; Mark H Delegge; James Aisenberg; Joel V Brill; John M Inadomi; Michael L Kochman; Joseph D Piorkowski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Statement on the use of sedation and analgesia in the gastrointestinal endoscopy setting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.978

Review 6.  Colonoscopy quality assurance in Ontario: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Erin B Kennedy; David Baron; Mae Burke; Stanley Feinberg; Michael Gould; Nancy Baxter; Nancy Lewis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05

7.  Utilization of anesthesia services during outpatient endoscopies and colonoscopies and associated spending in 2003-2009.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Daniel A Waxman; Regan Main; Soeren Mattke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Dayna S Early; Jenifer R Lightdale; John J Vargo; Ruben D Acosta; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Krishnavel V Chathadi; John A Evans; Deborah A Fisher; Lisa Fonkalsrud; Joo Ha Hwang; Mouen A Khashab; V Raman Muthusamy; Shabana F Pasha; John R Saltzman; Amandeep K Shergill; Brooks D Cash; John M DeWitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  B Seip; M Bretthauer; S Dahler; J Friestad; G Huppertz-Hauss; O Høie; E Kittang; S Nyhus; J Pallenschat; P Sandvei; A Stallemo; M V Svendsen; G Hoff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Anesthesia Service Use During Outpatient Gastroenterology Procedures Continued to Increase From 2010 to 2013 and Potentially Discretionary Spending Remained High.

Authors:  Zachary Predmore; Xiaoyu Nie; Regan Main; Soeren Mattke; Hangsheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  7 in total

1.  Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Assisted with Computed Tomography Image Information Data Monitoring in Postoperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Combined Anesthesia of Propofol and Butorphanol Tartrate under Electronic Health.

Authors:  Yueguang Wei; Jianxun Liu; Xuhai Gong
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation with Adjuvant Sufentanil in Chinese Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Undergoing Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  YingHao Cao; Ping Chi; Chen Zhou; WenFei Lv; ZheFen Quan; Fu Shan Xue
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Tosilate versus Etomidate-Propofol in Elderly Outpatients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Xianwen Liu; Baofeng Ding; Fu Shi; Yang Zhang; Lei Liu; Yongwei Sha; Tonghang Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 4.  Illicit Drug Use and Endoscopy: When Do We Say No?

Authors:  John P Gallagher; Patrick A Twohig; Agnes Crnic; Fedja A Rochling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yue Sui; Xing Chen; Ting Ma; Junhui Lu; Tao Xiao; Zhenzhen Wang; Qing Wen; Guanfeng Wang; Hui Jia; Fengzhen Cao; Xiaopeng Wu; Yiping Zhang; Junlian Hao; Naping Wang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.369

6.  The median effective doses of propofol combined with two different doses of nalbuphine for adult patients during painless gastroscopy.

Authors:  Lili Tang; Chenxuan Ye; Nan Wang; Chen Chen; Sirui Chen; Shan Gao; Xuesheng Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Sascha Gruss; Sebastian Goetze; Niklas Mehlhase; Stephan Frisch; Benjamin Walter; Steffen Walter
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.