Literature DB >> 33413123

Composition and risk assessment of perioperative patient safety incidents reported by anesthesiologists from 2009 to 2019: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Xue Zhang1, Shuang Ma1, Xueqin Sun2, Yuelun Zhang3, Weiyun Chen1, Qing Chang4, Hui Pan4, Xiuhua Zhang1, Le Shen5, Yuguang Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient safety incident (PSI) reporting has been an important means of improving patient safety and enhancing organizational quality control. Reports of anesthesia-related incidents are of great value for analysis to improve perioperative patient safety. However, the utilization of incident data is far from sufficient, especially in developing countries such as China.
METHODS: All PSIs reported by anesthesiologists in a Chinese academic hospital between September 2009 and August 2019 were collected from the incident reporting system. We reviewed the freeform text reports, supplemented with information from the patient medical record system. Composition analysis and risk assessment were performed.
RESULTS: In total, 847 PSIs were voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists during the study period among 452,974 anesthetic procedures, with a reported incidence of 0.17%. Patients with a worse ASA physical status were more likely to be involved in a PSI. The most common type of incident was related to the airway (N = 208, 27%), followed by the heart, brain and vascular system (N = 99, 13%) and pharmacological incidents (N = 79, 10%). Those preventable incidents with extreme or high risk were identified through risk assessment to serve as a reference for the implementation of more standard operating procedures by the department.
CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the characteristics of 847 PSIs voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists within eleven years in a Chinese academic hospital. Airway incidents constitute the majority of incidents reported by anesthesiologists. Underreporting is common in China, and the importance of summarizing and utilizing anesthesia incident data should be scrutinized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Incident reporting system; Patient safety; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413123      PMCID: PMC7789294          DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01226-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol        ISSN: 1471-2253            Impact factor:   2.217


  21 in total

1.  Review of patient safety incidents reported from critical care units in North-West England in 2009 and 2010.

Authors:  A N Thomas; R J Taylor
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  An analysis of critical incidents in a teaching department for quality assurance. A survey of mishaps during anaesthesia.

Authors:  V Kumar; W A Barcellos; M P Mehta; J G Carter
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Review of critical incidents in a university department of anaesthesia.

Authors:  T Saito; Z W Wong; K K Thinn; K H Poon; E Liu
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 4.  Critical incident reporting and learning.

Authors:  R P Mahajan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  An analysis of patient safety incidents associated with medications reported from critical care units in the North West of England between 2009 and 2012.

Authors:  A N Thomas; R J Taylor
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Patient safety incidents associated with airway devices in critical care: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency.

Authors:  A N Thomas; B A McGrath
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  A review of patient safety incidents reported as 'severe' or 'death' from critical care units in England and Wales between 2004 and 2014.

Authors:  A N Thomas; J J MacDonald
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Problems with ventilation: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.

Authors:  W J Russell; R K Webb; J H Van der Walt; W B Runciman
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.669

9.  The impact of a standardized incident reporting system in the perioperative setting: a single center experience on 2,563 'near-misses' and adverse events.

Authors:  Anita J Heideveld-Chevalking; Hiske Calsbeek; Johan Damen; Hein Gooszen; André P Wolff
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-12-10

10.  Association between the use of a stylet in endotracheal intubation and postoperative arytenoid dislocation: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lingeer Wu; Le Shen; Yuelun Zhang; Xiuhua Zhang; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.