Ismael Chehaibou1, Jean-Pierre Hubschman2, Sundeep Kasi3, Daniel Su4, Anthony Joseph5, Pradeep Prasad2, Ashkan M Abbey6, Alain Gaudric1, Ramin Tadayoni7, Ehsan Rahimy8. 1. Université de Paris, Ophthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, Paris, France. 2. Retina Division, Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 3. The Retina Group of Washington, Fairfax, Virginia; Department of Ophthalmology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC. 4. Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Texas Retina Associates, Dallas, Texas. 7. Université de Paris, Ophthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, Paris, France; Retina Division, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France. 8. Department of Ophthalmology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: erahimy@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients experiencing a spontaneous conversion of a lamellar macular hole (LMH) to a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with LMH who experienced a spontaneous conversion to FTMH and underwent FTMH surgery. METHODS: Clinical charts and OCT features of 20 eyes of 20 patients were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OCT features and surgical outcomes of FTMH derived from LMH. RESULTS: The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.21 ± 0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (20/32 Snellen equivalent [SE]). Epiretinal proliferation was noted in 18 eyes (90%), and 14 eyes (75%) had an epiretinal membrane. At the diagnosis of FTMH, the mean VA decreased to 0.61 ± 0.50 logMAR (20/81 SE) (P = 0.001). The mean FTMH diameter was 224.4 ± 194.8 μm, with 15 (75%) small (≤250 μm), 2 (10%) medium (>250-≤400 μm), and 3 (15%) large (>400 μm) FTMHs. Eighteen (90%) FTMHs were sealed after 1 surgery, and 2 (10%) required an additional procedure. At the last follow-up, the mean VA was increased to 0.29 ± 0.23 logMAR (20/38 SE) (P = 0.003), but did not significantly differ from the baseline VA (P = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMH may develop an FTMH with no evidence of vitreomacular traction. A tangential traction from an epiretinal membrane may contribute to its genesis, but a progressive loss of retinal tissue and an inherent weakness of the foveal architecture in LMH eyes could be sufficient. Most FTMHs derived from LMH had a small diameter, showed epiretinal proliferation, showed limited retinal hydration, and were associated with relatively poor surgical outcomes compared with idiopathic FTMH.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients experiencing a spontaneous conversion of a lamellar macular hole (LMH) to a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with LMH who experienced a spontaneous conversion to FTMH and underwent FTMH surgery. METHODS: Clinical charts and OCT features of 20 eyes of 20 patients were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OCT features and surgical outcomes of FTMH derived from LMH. RESULTS: The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.21 ± 0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (20/32 Snellen equivalent [SE]). Epiretinal proliferation was noted in 18 eyes (90%), and 14 eyes (75%) had an epiretinal membrane. At the diagnosis of FTMH, the mean VA decreased to 0.61 ± 0.50 logMAR (20/81 SE) (P = 0.001). The mean FTMH diameter was 224.4 ± 194.8 μm, with 15 (75%) small (≤250 μm), 2 (10%) medium (>250-≤400 μm), and 3 (15%) large (>400 μm) FTMHs. Eighteen (90%) FTMHs were sealed after 1 surgery, and 2 (10%) required an additional procedure. At the last follow-up, the mean VA was increased to 0.29 ± 0.23 logMAR (20/38 SE) (P = 0.003), but did not significantly differ from the baseline VA (P = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMH may develop an FTMH with no evidence of vitreomacular traction. A tangential traction from an epiretinal membrane may contribute to its genesis, but a progressive loss of retinal tissue and an inherent weakness of the foveal architecture in LMH eyes could be sufficient. Most FTMHs derived from LMH had a small diameter, showed epiretinal proliferation, showed limited retinal hydration, and were associated with relatively poor surgical outcomes compared with idiopathic FTMH.