Literature DB >> 33412281

Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

David Haslacher1, Khaled Nasr1, Stephen E Robinson2, Christoph Braun3, Surjo R Soekadar4.   

Abstract

Brain oscillations, e.g. measured by electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), are causally linked to brain functions that are fundamental for perception, cognition and learning. Recent advances in neurotechnology provide means to non-invasively target these oscillations using frequency-tuned amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). However, online adaptation of stimulation parameters to ongoing brain oscillations remains an unsolved problem due to stimulation artifacts that impede such adaptation, particularly at the target frequency. Here, we introduce a real-time compatible artifact rejection algorithm (Stimulation Artifact Source Separation, SASS) that overcomes this limitation. SASS is a spatial filter (linear projection) removing EEG signal components that are maximally different in the presence versus absence of stimulation. This enables the reliable removal of stimulation-specific signal components, while leaving physiological signal components unaffected. For validation of SASS, we evoked brain activity with known phase and amplitude using 10 Hz visual flickers across 7 healthy human volunteers. 64-channel EEG was recorded during and in absence of 10 Hz AM-tACS targeting the visual cortex. Phase differences between AM-tACS and the visual stimuli were randomized, so that steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were phase-locked to the visual stimuli but not to the AM-tACS signal. For validation, distributions of single-trial amplitude and phase of EEG signals recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were compared for each participant. When no artifact rejection method was applied, AM-tACS stimulation artifacts impeded assessment of single-trial SSVEP amplitude and phase. Using SASS, amplitude and phase of single trials recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were comparable. These results indicate that SASS can be used to establish adaptive (closed-loop) AM-tACS, a potentially powerful tool to target various brain functions, and to investigate how AM-tACS interacts with electric brain oscillations.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain oscillations; Electroencephalography (EEG); Single-trial; Stimulation artifact; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33412281     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  3 in total

1.  Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Rabea Sobirey; David Haslacher; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  Pathological Delta Oscillations in Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder: A Case Report.

Authors:  David Haslacher; Nikolina Novkovic; Maria Buthut; Andreas Heinz; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  High Gamma and Beta Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Motor Cortex Improves Motor Functions.

Authors:  Ru Ma; Xinzhao Xia; Wei Zhang; Zhuo Lu; Qianying Wu; Jiangtian Cui; Hongwen Song; Chuan Fan; Xueli Chen; Rujing Zha; Junjie Wei; Gong-Jun Ji; Xiaoxiao Wang; Bensheng Qiu; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.