Literature DB >> 33411808

Impact of different management measures on the colonization of broiler chickens with ESBL- and pAmpC- producing Escherichia coli in an experimental seeder-bird model.

Caroline Robé1, Katrin Daehre1, Roswitha Merle2, Anika Friese1, Sebastian Guenther3, Uwe Roesler1.   

Abstract

The colonization of broilers with extended-spectrum β-lactamase- (ESBL-) and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase- (pAmpC-) producing Enterobacteriaceae has been extensively studied. However, only limited data on intervention strategies to reduce the colonization throughout the fattening period are available. To investigate practically relevant management measures for their potential to reduce colonization, a recently published seeder-bird colonization model was used. Groups of 90 broilers (breed Ross 308) were housed in pens under conventional conditions (stocking of 39 kg/m2, no enrichment, water and feed ad libitum). Tested measures were investigated in separate trials and included (I) an increased amount of litter in the pen, (II) the reduction of stocking density to 25 kg/m2, and (III) the use of an alternative broiler breed (Rowan x Ranger). One-fifth of ESBL- and pAmpC- negative broilers (n = 18) per group were orally co-inoculated with two E. coli strains on the third day of the trial (seeder). One CTX-M-15-positive E. coli strain (ST410) and one CMY-2 and mcr-1-positive E. coli strain (ST10) were simultaneously administered in a dosage of 102 cfu. Colonization of all seeders and 28 non-inoculated broilers (sentinel) was assessed via cloacal swabs during the trials and a final necropsy at a target weight of two kilograms (= d 36 (control, I-II), d 47 (III)). None of the applied intervention measures reduced the colonization of the broilers with both the ESBL- and the pAmpC- producing E. coli strains. A strain-dependent reduction of colonization for the ESBL- producing E. coli strain of ST410 by 2 log units was apparent by the reduction of stocking density to 25 kg/m2. Consequently, the tested management measures had a negligible effect on the ESBL- and pAmpC- colonization of broilers. Therefore, intervention strategies should focus on the prevention of ESBL- and pAmpC- colonization, rather than an attempt to reduce an already existing colonization.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411808      PMCID: PMC7790425          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  36 in total

1.  High stocking density as a predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis in broiler chicks.

Authors:  V Tsiouris; I Georgopoulou; C Batzios; N Pappaioannou; R Ducatelle; P Fortomaris
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.378

2.  Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase- and Plasmid-Encoded Cephamycinase-Producing Enterobacteria in the Broiler Hatchery as a Potential Mode of Pseudo-Vertical Transmission.

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Katrin Daehre; Uwe Roesler; Anika Friese
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers.

Authors:  D Persoons; F Haesebrouck; A Smet; L Herman; M Heyndrickx; A Martel; B Catry; A C Berge; P Butaye; J Dewulf
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Longitudinal monitoring of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli at German broiler chicken fattening farms.

Authors:  H Laube; A Friese; C von Salviati; B Guerra; A Käsbohrer; L Kreienbrock; U Roesler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Differences in the early response of hatchlings of different chicken breeding lines to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection.

Authors:  D Schokker; T H F Peters; A J W Hoekman; J M J Rebel; M A Smits
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Influence of different litter materials on cecal microbiota colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  V A Torok; R J Hughes; K Ophel-Keller; M Ali; R Macalpine
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Robert J Hughes; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines.

Authors:  Dirkjan Schokker; Gosse Veninga; Stephanie A Vastenhouw; Alex Bossers; Freddy M de Bree; Lucia M T E Kaal-Lansbergen; Johanna M J Rebel; Mari A Smits
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Development of the Caecal Microbiota in Three Broiler Breeds.

Authors:  Peter Richards; Jo Fothergill; Marion Bernardeau; Paul Wigley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-06-25

10.  Low Dose Colonization of Broiler Chickens With ESBL-/AmpC- Producing Escherichia coli in a Seeder-Bird Model Independent of Antimicrobial Selection Pressure.

Authors:  Caroline Robé; Anja Blasse; Roswitha Merle; Anika Friese; Uwe Roesler; Sebastian Guenther
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany.

Authors:  Sara Perestrelo; Guido Correia Carreira; Lars Valentin; Jennie Fischer; Yvonne Pfeifer; Guido Werner; Judith Schmiedel; Linda Falgenhauer; Can Imirzalioglu; Trinad Chakraborty; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Modeling the Impact of Management Changes on the Infection Dynamics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in the Broiler Production.

Authors:  Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Michaela Projahn; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.