Literature DB >> 33411744

Forecasting COVID-19 confirmed cases, deaths and recoveries: Revisiting established time series modeling through novel applications for the USA and Italy.

Emrah Gecili1, Assem Ziady2,3, Rhonda D Szczesniak1,2,3.   

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is an emergent disease that initially had no historical data to guide scientists on predicting/ forecasting its global or national impact over time. The ability to predict the progress of this pandemic has been crucial for decision making aimed at fighting this pandemic and controlling its spread. In this work we considered four different statistical/time series models that are readily available from the 'forecast' package in R. We performed novel applications with these models, forecasting the number of infected cases (confirmed cases and similarly the number of deaths and recovery) along with the corresponding 90% prediction interval to estimate uncertainty around pointwise forecasts. Since the future may not repeat the past for this pandemic, no prediction model is certain. However, any prediction tool with acceptable prediction performance (or prediction error) could still be very useful for public-health planning to handle spread of the pandemic, and could policy decision-making and facilitate transition to normality. These four models were applied to publicly available data of the COVID-19 pandemic for both the USA and Italy. We observed that all models reasonably predicted the future numbers of confirmed cases, deaths, and recoveries of COVID-19. However, for the majority of the analyses, the time series model with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and cubic smoothing spline models both had smaller prediction errors and narrower prediction intervals, compared to the Holt and Trigonometric Exponential smoothing state space model with Box-Cox transformation (TBATS) models. Therefore, the former two models were preferable to the latter models. Given similarities in performance of the models in the USA and Italy, the corresponding prediction tools can be applied to other countries grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, and to any pandemics that can occur in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411744      PMCID: PMC7790225          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mathematical modelling and prediction in infectious disease epidemiology.

Authors:  A Huppert; G Katriel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Forecasting the novel coronavirus COVID-19.

Authors:  Fotios Petropoulos; Spyros Makridakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal

Authors:  Laure Wynants; Ben Van Calster; Gary S Collins; Richard D Riley; Georg Heinze; Ewoud Schuit; Marc M J Bonten; Darren L Dahly; Johanna A A Damen; Thomas P A Debray; Valentijn M T de Jong; Maarten De Vos; Paul Dhiman; Maria C Haller; Michael O Harhay; Liesbet Henckaerts; Pauline Heus; Michael Kammer; Nina Kreuzberger; Anna Lohmann; Kim Luijken; Jie Ma; Glen P Martin; David J McLernon; Constanza L Andaur Navarro; Johannes B Reitsma; Jamie C Sergeant; Chunhu Shi; Nicole Skoetz; Luc J M Smits; Kym I E Snell; Matthew Sperrin; René Spijker; Ewout W Steyerberg; Toshihiko Takada; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Sander M J van Kuijk; Bas van Bussel; Iwan C C van der Horst; Florien S van Royen; Jan Y Verbakel; Christine Wallisch; Jack Wilkinson; Robert Wolff; Lotty Hooft; Karel G M Moons; Maarten van Smeden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-04-07
  3 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comparison of Conventional Modeling Techniques with the Neural Network Autoregressive Model (NNAR): Application to COVID-19 Data.

Authors:  Muhammad Daniyal; Kassim Tawiah; Sara Muhammadullah; Kwaku Opoku-Ameyaw
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.822

2.  Testing Different COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies Using an Agent-Based Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Fouad Trad; Salah El Falou
Journal:  SN Comput Sci       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  On computational analysis of nonlinear regression models addressing heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation issues: An application to COVID-19 data.

Authors:  Mintodê Nicodème Atchadé; Paul Tchanati P
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-12

4.  Health, psychosocial, and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with chronic conditions in India: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Kavita Singh; Dimple Kondal; Sailesh Mohan; Suganthi Jaganathan; Mohan Deepa; Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy; Prashant Jarhyan; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; K M Venkat Narayan; Viswanathan Mohan; Nikhil Tandon; Mohammed K Ali; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Karen Eggleston
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Panel Associations Between Newly Dead, Healed, Recovered, and Confirmed Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ming Guan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-12-11

6.  Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on ex-vessel prices using time-series analysis.

Authors:  Keita Abe; Gakushi Ishimura; Shinya Baba; Shota Yasui; Kosuke Nakamura
Journal:  Fish Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Gauging the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Afshan Hassan; Devendra Prasad; Shalli Rani; Musah Alhassan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A spatio-temporal autoregressive model for monitoring and predicting COVID infection rates.

Authors:  Peter Congdon
Journal:  J Geogr Syst       Date:  2022-04-26

9.  Covid-19 cases prediction using SARIMAX Model by tuning hyperparameter through grid search cross-validation approach.

Authors:  Sweeti Sah; Balasubramanian Surendiran; Ramasamy Dhanalakshmi; Mohammed Yamin
Journal:  Expert Syst       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.812

10.  Changing trends in the air pollution-related disease burden from 1990 to 2019 and its predicted level in 25 years.

Authors:  Wan Hu; Lanlan Fang; Hengchuan Zhang; Ruyu Ni; Guixia Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.