Literature DB >> 33411733

Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire.

Timo Lorenz1, Kathrin Heinitz2, Clemens Beer2, Marianne van Woerkom3.   

Abstract

The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N1 = 302; N2 = 243, N3 = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411733      PMCID: PMC7790259          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  21 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Job burnout.

Authors:  C Maslach; W B Schaufeli; M P Leiter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  A balanced psychology and a full life.

Authors:  Martin E P Seligman; Acacia C Parks; Tracy Steen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.

Authors:  Samuel D Gosling; Simine Vazire; Sanjay Srivastava; Oliver P John
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar

5.  Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research.

Authors:  Michele Peters; Jan Passchier
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.887

6.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures.

Authors:  F Guillemin
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  The German Version of the Strengths Use Scale: The Relation of Using Individual Strengths and Well-being.

Authors:  Alexandra Huber; Dave Webb; Stefan Höfer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-27

10.  Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12).

Authors:  Timo Lorenz; Clemens Beer; Jan Pütz; Kathrin Heinitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.