Nidhiben Anadani1, Megan Hyland1, Roberto Alejandro Cruz1, Robert Lisak1, Kathleen Costello1, Eugene O Major1, Yasir Jassam1, Ethan Meltzer1, Thomas C Varkey1, Matthew S Parsons1, Andrew D Goodman1, Jennifer S Graves1, Scott Newsome1, Scott S Zamvil1, Elliot M Frohman2, Teresa C Frohman2. 1. From the University of Rochester (N.A.), NY. N. Anadani is now with Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Department of Neurology (M.H., A.D.G.), University of Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (R.A.C., E.M., T.C.V.), Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin; Department of Neurology (R.L.), Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; The National Multiple Sclerosis Society (K.C.), New York, NY; Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Neuroscience (E.O.M.), Neurological Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke (Y.J.), Bethesda, MD. Y. Jassam is now with Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas Health System; Colangelo College of Business (T.C.V.), Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ; Division of Microbiology and Immunology (M.S.P.), Yerkes National Primate Research Center, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M.S.P.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Neurosciences (J.S.G.), University of California at San Diego; Department of Neurology (S.N.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology and Program in Immunology (S.S.Z.), University of California San Francisco; and Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Ophthalmology (E.M.F., T.C.F.), Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin. 2. From the University of Rochester (N.A.), NY. N. Anadani is now with Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Department of Neurology (M.H., A.D.G.), University of Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (R.A.C., E.M., T.C.V.), Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin; Department of Neurology (R.L.), Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; The National Multiple Sclerosis Society (K.C.), New York, NY; Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Neuroscience (E.O.M.), Neurological Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke (Y.J.), Bethesda, MD. Y. Jassam is now with Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas Health System; Colangelo College of Business (T.C.V.), Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ; Division of Microbiology and Immunology (M.S.P.), Yerkes National Primate Research Center, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M.S.P.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Neurosciences (J.S.G.), University of California at San Diego; Department of Neurology (S.N.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology and Program in Immunology (S.S.Z.), University of California San Francisco; and Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Ophthalmology (E.M.F., T.C.F.), Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin. Elliot.frohman@austin.utexas.edu.
A 38-year-old woman with MS receiving natalizumab presented to the neurology clinic
with the complaint of a new neurologic symptom.
Clinical course
The patient had a 6-year history of clinically stable MS, albeit exhibiting
radiographic progression despite strict adherence to daily subcutaneous
glatiramer acetate (GA). Furthermore, on switching first to weekly IM interferon
beta (IFN-β)1a, she experienced clinical relapses and subsequently
developed recalcitrant transaminitis while using three times weekly,
subcutaneous IFN-β 1b (figure 1).
Figure 1
Chronological heat map
In this figure, we detail the condition of the patient over time. The
longitudinal axis (left to right) depicts the condition of disease,
where the smaller amplitude and lighter color indicates greater
stability of MS. Alternately, the expanded amplitude of the colored heat
map (above and below the horizontal linear axis over time) designates
increased disease activity (whether on a clinical or paraclinical basis)
or complications of the treatment of disease (e.g., PML). Four other
fields of information are added either above or below the heat map and
include information about treatments, diagnoses, commentaries adding
contextual perspectives, and results from specific test assessments from
each most relevant period of clinical decision-making. Each field is
consistently color coded throughout as defined in the figure legend.
IRIS = immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; IVIG = IV
immunoglobulin; JCV Ab = John Cunningham Polyomavirus antibody; LFT
= liver function test; PML = progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy.
Chronological heat map
In this figure, we detail the condition of the patient over time. The
longitudinal axis (left to right) depicts the condition of disease,
where the smaller amplitude and lighter color indicates greater
stability of MS. Alternately, the expanded amplitude of the colored heat
map (above and below the horizontal linear axis over time) designates
increased disease activity (whether on a clinical or paraclinical basis)
or complications of the treatment of disease (e.g., PML). Four other
fields of information are added either above or below the heat map and
include information about treatments, diagnoses, commentaries adding
contextual perspectives, and results from specific test assessments from
each most relevant period of clinical decision-making. Each field is
consistently color coded throughout as defined in the figure legend.
IRIS = immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; IVIG = IV
immunoglobulin; JCV Ab = John Cunningham Polyomavirus antibody; LFT
= liver function test; PML = progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy.Owing to continued disease activity and side effects from GA and IFN, she was
switched to monthly IV natalizumab despite John Cunningham Polyomavirus antibody
positivity (JCV Ab+) with an Ab index 3.37–3.83. She remained
clinically and radiographically stable from the inception of natalizumab with
surveillance MRIs performed quarterly. However, after her 47th natalizumab
infusion, she developed a coarse action and position tremor involving her right
distal upper extremity. Brain MRI revealed a nonenhancing left thalamic T2
hyperintensity (figure 2, A and B).
Figure 2
Evolution of the left thalamic lesion
In (A), an axial T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image
demonstrates a new hyperintense lesion localized to the left thalamus
(red arrows), with periventricular and juxtacortical lesions typical of
MS. In (B), an axial T1 postcontrast scan shows hypointensity of the
left thalamic lesion without contrast enhancement. In (C–G), we
present axial FLAIR images performed serially at 3, 7, 11, 16, and 20
weeks, respectively, after the inception of the right upper extremity
tremor. Over this period, the lesion has slightly increased in size, and
in (F), the lesion takes on a ring configuration with central
hypointensity (red arrows). This lesion failed to exhibit any evidence
of contrast enhancement over the period of surveillance imaging.
Evolution of the left thalamic lesion
In (A), an axial T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image
demonstrates a new hyperintense lesion localized to the left thalamus
(red arrows), with periventricular and juxtacortical lesions typical of
MS. In (B), an axial T1 postcontrast scan shows hypointensity of the
left thalamic lesion without contrast enhancement. In (C–G), we
present axial FLAIR images performed serially at 3, 7, 11, 16, and 20
weeks, respectively, after the inception of the right upper extremity
tremor. Over this period, the lesion has slightly increased in size, and
in (F), the lesion takes on a ring configuration with central
hypointensity (red arrows). This lesion failed to exhibit any evidence
of contrast enhancement over the period of surveillance imaging.Natalizumab was suspended while her physicians investigated the underlying
etiology for her new clinical symptom and corresponding imaging abnormality. CSF
analyses was noninflammatory and JCV DNA was undetectable by PCR. The initial
diagnostic supposition was that the lesion was potentially on the basis of
inflammatory demyelination, even in the absence of gadolinium (Gd) enhancement.
The patient was treated empirically with 1 g IV methylprednisolone daily for 3
doses without benefit.Given concerns of her history of protracted natalizumab treatment and a high JCV
antibody index, monthly serial MRIs were obtained (figure 2, C–G), which showed lesion progression, although JCV
DNA was not detectable on serial CSF PCR analyses (4 in total).Over time, the patient's tremor gradually worsened despite treatment with
clonazepam and carbamazepine. Botulinum injection in combination with
levetiracetam did mitigate the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the
tremor such that the patient was able to recognize functional improvements.
Notwithstanding such benefits on her tremor, she later exhibited features of
dystonia that further interfered with her use of the right arm. Despite the
unremarkable CSF analyses, clinical suspicion for progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy (PML) remained high, although natalizumab was redosed once
at 3 months to reduce the risk for potential rebound disease activity.[1]
Differential diagnosis
The patient's right upper extremity tremor corresponded with a new lesion
that localized to the left ventral lateral posterior aspect of the thalamic
nuclear complex—the target for the projections emanating from the right
dentate nucleus of the cerebellum—which then projects to the left
precentral gyrus, thereby providing right cerebellar influence on limb movements
in the right arm.At the time of presentation, the possibility of a new MS demyelinating lesion was
considered high in the differential diagnosis. Demyelinating lesions due to MS
are commonly localized in white matter (especially when using conventional MRI
sequences), but focal lesions in the thalamus are also well
documented.[2] Typically,
however, new demyelinating symptomatic lesions exhibit enhancement, and the
absence of such in our patient compelled us to broaden the diagnostic
differential.Clinical manifestations of PML in MS are diverse and depend on the areas of the
brain involved. Typically, brain MRI shows a T2 hyperintense/T1 hypointense
lesion(s) with sharp margins, commonly involving subcortical white matter
including extension into the U-fibers, although cortical involvement is often
reported. Contrast enhancement is exceptional in HIV-associated PML, yet it is
seen in about 40% of MS PML cases.[3] Despite high sensitivity (>95%) of CSF PCR for JCV in
PML, JCV has infrequently remained undetectable in the CSF in cases where PML
was confirmed by brain biopsy.[4]
Final diagnosis
As a precise diagnosis could not be made from the imaging and laboratory data, a
biopsy of the lesion was performed 5 months after presentation. Histology
demonstrated bizarre astrocytes, abundant CD68-positive macrophages, and nuclear
changes suggestive of viral cytopathic effects. JCV DNA was detected at
9,964,282 copies/10 μL of extract confirming the diagnosis of PML.
Discussion
PML is a known complication of treatment with natalizumab in patients with MS with a
history of previous exposure to JCV.[5] Furthermore, risk of PML in patients who test positive for serum
JCV Abs exponentially increases with a history of previous immunosuppression (e.g.,
cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, etc) and longer duration of continuous natalizumab
therapy (e.g., >24 months).[6]
This does not include pulse steroids for treating relapses. This risk is further
stratified by the quantitative index where a JCV Ab index >1.5 in patients with
MS treated with natalizumab at 4-week intervals is associated with high risk of
PML,[7] although data suggest
that extended interval dosing confers a lower risk of PML without compromising
efficacy.[8-10]Diagnostic confirmation of PML can often represent a formidable challenge,
particularly given the heterogeneity in imaging characteristics. The conspicuity of
PML lesion morphology in the context of HIV/AIDS can be distinctive from lesions
evolving as a consequence of protracted immunosuppression in patients with
autoimmune disorders.[3] In HIV, PML
lesions are typically hypointense and, on occasion, can exhibit enhancement, whereas
such lesions in the context of patients with MS treated with natalizumab exhibit
enhancement in 30%–40% of cases.[3] Together, clinical presentation, radiologic findings, and
presence of CSF JCV PCR DNA play important roles in PML diagnosis, although tissue
biopsy also has a prominent and necessary role when other assessments fails to
confirm the diagnosis.Our case report presented herein illustrates that in spite of highly sensitive CSF
assays for JCV DNA, such findings cannot adequately counter against the diagnosis of
PML, particularly when a clinical syndrome in the setting of an atypical CNS lesion
remains suspicious. In situations such as this, tissue biopsy is imperative and
represents the gold standard.Treatment of natalizumab-associated PML is complex. Plasmapheresis is an option, but
one needs to consider the effect that the rapid removal of natalizumab may have in
accelerating the development of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
(IRIS). This is especially important because the clinical outcome can be worse with
early PML-IRIS compared with late PML-IRIS.[11] Corticosteroids may be used for PML-IRIS and have
demonstrated benefit when used judiciously, although no randomized control studies
are available.The patient experienced clinical worsening with increased right sided weakness and
dystonic tremor a few weeks after the biopsy. Postcontrast MRI performed at this
time (27 weeks after symptom onset) showed nodular enhancement in the right frontal
and parietal subcortical white matter, left frontal periventricular and precentral
subcortical white matter, and in the left dorsolateral pons in the region of the
left superior cerebellar peduncle (figure 3,
small arrow heads). Steroids were not used at this time because she had not
tolerated them well on earlier administration. Instead, the patient was treated with
0.4 g/kg/d IV immunoglobulin for a total of 5 days, after which she exhibited
further improvement in her symptoms.
Figure 3
Interval neuroradiographic progression
In (A), we present axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images revealing
disseminated lesions characteristic for inflammatory demyelination in the
periventribular zones, in the centrum semiovale, in the corona radiata, and
in the cortex and juxtacortical zones, in addition to the previously
identified left thalamic lesion, here exhibiting a ring configuration with
central hypointensity (red arrow). In (B), we present axial T1 postcontrast
images showing various nodular enhancing lesions in left dorsolateral pons
and bilateral frontal lobes and patchy punctate enhancements in left frontal
and parietal white matter (red arrows).
Interval neuroradiographic progression
In (A), we present axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images revealing
disseminated lesions characteristic for inflammatory demyelination in the
periventribular zones, in the centrum semiovale, in the corona radiata, and
in the cortex and juxtacortical zones, in addition to the previously
identified left thalamic lesion, here exhibiting a ring configuration with
central hypointensity (red arrow). In (B), we present axial T1 postcontrast
images showing various nodular enhancing lesions in left dorsolateral pons
and bilateral frontal lobes and patchy punctate enhancements in left frontal
and parietal white matter (red arrows).Unfortunately, there are limited data in the literature regarding disease-modifying
therapy (DMT) options in such patients who have been diagnosed with
natalizumab-associated PML. However, one small case series suggests that INF-β
and GA, as well as dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod, seem to be safe in post-PMLpatients, although long-term safety data are lacking.[12,13] There
are a few case reports that describe utilization of rituximab in post-PMLpatients.[14]In the case reported herein, there was significant concern that use of an
immunosuppressive DMT might provoke recrudescence of PML, thereby compromising
neurologic recovery. As such, the patient was started on immunomodulatory therapy,
in spite of its previous incomplete effectiveness for treating her MS. Specifically,
IFN-β 1b was selected over daily subcutaneous GA because of presumed more
rapid onset of action with IFN therapy and the patient preference regarding
tolerability with fewer injections.The patient tolerated IFN-β 1b without side effects or radiologic activity for
19 months. However, she then developed a left parietal lobe T2 hyperintensity that
demonstrated incomplete peripheral Gd-enhancement, most compatible with an active MS
lesion. Repeat MRIs after 2 and 4 months showed additional new enhancing lesions,
although the previously identified left thalamic lesion and the subcortical white
matter changes extending from the left thalamus to prefrontal cortex seemed less
conspicuous. IFN-β neutralizing antibodies were not detected.Once clinical stabilization was achieved, attention then shifted to the
intensification of the patient's MS DMT, with the goal to use an agent with
properties capable of achieving a durable remission while also conferring a low risk
of PML recrudescence. For these reasons, once-daily oral teriflunomide was
identified as an acceptable next step in the patient's treatment course (figure 1). This agent targets the biosynthetic
enzyme, dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase, thereby inhibiting the de novo pyrimidine
synthesis pathway (principally used by rapidly dividing cells such as T and B
lymphocytes and for virion replication).To date, our patient has remained clinically and radiologically stable for more than
2 years after the treatment transition to teriflunomide. Despite the achievement of
this period of remission in our patient's disease activity, careful and
systematic clinical and paraclinical surveillance investigations will be imperative.
Until evidence-based data sufficient to provide treatment guidelines become
available, the management of MS after the development and survival of PML must be
formulated on a case-by-case basis.
Authors: Gary Bloomgren; Sandra Richman; Christophe Hotermans; Meena Subramanyam; Susan Goelz; Amy Natarajan; Sophia Lee; Tatiana Plavina; James V Scanlon; Alfred Sandrock; Carmen Bozic Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph R Berger; Allen J Aksamit; David B Clifford; Larry Davis; Igor J Koralnik; James J Sejvar; Russell Bartt; Eugene O Major; Avindra Nath Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alireza Minagar; Michael H Barnett; Ralph H B Benedict; Daniel Pelletier; Istvan Pirko; Mohamad Ali Sahraian; Elliott Frohman; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tarek A Yousry; Daniel Pelletier; Diego Cadavid; Achim Gass; Nancy D Richert; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Massimo Filippi Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 10.422