Shayna S Bassett1, Daniel J Delaney1, Amy M Moore2, Mary Clair-Michaud3, Jennifer G Clarke4, L A R Stein1. 1. Department of Psychology, Social Sciences Research Center, University of Rhode Island. 2. Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island. 3. The Rhode Island Training School. 4. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite male youth taking more sexual risks that lead to unwanted partner pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), research evaluating interventions for risky sex has focused almost exclusively on adolescent and adult females. With STIs among male youth on the rise, behavioral interventions that target risky sex among male youth are needed. PURPOSE: A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized behavioral interventions for sexually active male youth. METHODS: Sexually active at-risk male youth (N = 27) were recruited and randomized to receive one session of motivational interviewing (MI) or didactic educational counseling (DEC). Assessment interviews were conducted prior to and 3 months following the intervention session. RESULTS: Support for the feasibility and acceptability of delivering behavioral interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth was found. Compared to participants in DEC at follow-up, participants in MI reported having significantly fewer sexual encounters with casual partners, used substances at the time of sex significantly less often with all partners and casual partners, and reported fewer incidents of using substances at the time of sex without a condom with all partners. Conversely, participants who received MI used substances at the time of sex with main partners and used substances at the time of sex without a condom more often with main partners at follow-up compared to participants who received DEC. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the pilot study support conducting a larger randomized controlled trial to examine treatment effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
BACKGROUND: Despite male youth taking more sexual risks that lead to unwanted partner pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), research evaluating interventions for risky sex has focused almost exclusively on adolescent and adult females. With STIs among male youth on the rise, behavioral interventions that target risky sex among male youth are needed. PURPOSE: A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized behavioral interventions for sexually active male youth. METHODS: Sexually active at-risk male youth (N = 27) were recruited and randomized to receive one session of motivational interviewing (MI) or didactic educational counseling (DEC). Assessment interviews were conducted prior to and 3 months following the intervention session. RESULTS: Support for the feasibility and acceptability of delivering behavioral interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth was found. Compared to participants in DEC at follow-up, participants in MI reported having significantly fewer sexual encounters with casual partners, used substances at the time of sex significantly less often with all partners and casual partners, and reported fewer incidents of using substances at the time of sex without a condom with all partners. Conversely, participants who received MI used substances at the time of sex with main partners and used substances at the time of sex without a condom more often with main partners at follow-up compared to participants who received DEC. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the pilot study support conducting a larger randomized controlled trial to examine treatment effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Beth Barnet; Jiexin Liu; Margo DeVoe; Anne K Duggan; Melanie A Gold; Edward Pecukonis Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Mark Sobell; Mary M Velasquez; Karen Ingersoll; Mary Nettleman; Linda Sobell; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Sherry Ceperich; Kirk von Sternberg; Burt Bolton; Kenneth Johnson; Bradley Skarpness; Jyothi Nagaraja Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lisa A Eaton; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Seth C Kalichman; Jennifer A Pellowski; Michael J Sagherian; Michelle Warren; Ami R Popat; Blair T Johnson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: L A R Stein; Mary Clair; Rebecca Lebeau; Suzanne M Colby; Nancy P Barnett; Charles Golembeske; Peter M Monti Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Mary Clair; L A R Stein; Shayna Soenksen; Rosemarie A Martin; Rebecca Lebeau; Charles Golembeske Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2013-06-28