Literature DB >> 33411150

Effect of High Static Magnetic Field (2 T-12 T) Exposure on the Mineral Element Content in Mice.

Shenghang Wang1,2,3, Ting Huyan1,2,3, Liangfu Zhou1,2,3, Yanru Xue1,2,3, Weihong Guo2,3, Dachuan Yin2,3, Peng Shang4,5,6.   

Abstract

Relative stability of mineral elements in tissues is necessary for health. High static magnetic fields (HiSMFs) have been widely used in biomedical research and industry. However, the bioeffect of HiSMFs on animals is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of HiSMF exposure on the levels of Mg, Fe, Zn, Ca, and Cu in the main organs of mice. The 8-week male C57BL/6 mice were treated by 2-4 T, 6-8 T, 10-12 T HiSMFs for 28 days. The mass fractions of Mg, Fe, Zn, Ca, and Cu in the liver, brain, kidney, and heart in mice were respectively measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy, and used to evaluate mineral element content in tissues. The 2-4 T HiSMF exposure has increased the Mg, Fe, and Ca content in the kidney, as well as the Zn content in the brain. The 6-8 T HiSMF exposure has increased the Zn level in the liver; Mg, Fe, and Ca levels in the kidney; and Fe level in the heart, while the Zn in the kidney, and Zn and Ca in the heart was decreased by 6-8 T HiSMF exposure. For the 10-12 T HiSMF exposure, the Mg in the kidney, the Fe in the liver and kidney, and Cu in the brain have been increased significantly. However, the Zn in the kidney and the Ca in the brain and the heart were reduced by 10-12 T HiSMF exposure. The HiSMF exposure for 28 days can alter the Mg, Fe, Zn, Ca, and Cu content in mice, and change with the different magnetic flux density of HiSMFs (2-4 T, 6-8 T, 10-12 T), elements, and organ types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High static magnetic fields; Mice; Mineral elements; Organs; inbred C57BL

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411150     DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02469-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res        ISSN: 0163-4984            Impact factor:   3.738


  36 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems.

Authors:  Arthur D Rosen
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.194

2.  Cell shape and plasma membrane alterations after static magnetic fields exposure.

Authors:  A Chionna; M Dwikat; E Panzarini; B Tenuzzo; E C Carlà; T Verri; P Pagliara; L Abbro; L Dini
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Environmental influences on the trace element content of teeth--implications for disease and nutritional status.

Authors:  Catriona J Brown; Simon R N Chenery; Barry Smith; Carol Mason; Andrew Tomkins; Graham J Roberts; Louise Sserunjogi; John V Tiberindwa
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  The world's strongest MRI machines are pushing human imaging to new limits.

Authors:  Anna Nowogrodzki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effects of 3.5-23.0 T static magnetic fields on mice: A safety study.

Authors:  Xiaofei Tian; Dongmei Wang; Shuang Feng; Lei Zhang; Xinmiao Ji; Ze Wang; Qingyou Lu; Chuanying Xi; Li Pi; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  The effects of static magnetic fields on bone.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Chong Ding; Li Ren; Yimin Zhou; Peng Shang
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Investigating the physiological effects of 10.5 Tesla static field exposure on anesthetized swine.

Authors:  Yigitcan Eryaman; Patrick Zhang; Lynn Utecht; Kivanc Kose; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; Jeramy Kulesa; Lynn E Eberly; Gregor Adriany; Tinen L Iles; Paul A Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Visual illusions affecting radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  D C Eaglesham
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1968-06

9.  Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability.

Authors:  Ivan Tatarov; Aruna Panda; Daniel Petkov; Krishnan Kolappaswamy; Keyata Thompson; Anoop Kavirayani; Michael M Lipsky; Edward Elson; Christopher C Davis; Stuart S Martin; Louis J DeTolla
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 10.  Nuclear magnetic resonance technology for medical studies.

Authors:  T F Budinger; P C Lauterbur
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.