Kazuhiko Tsuruya1, Terumasa Hayashi2, Hiroyasu Yamamoto3, Hiroki Hase4, Shinichi Nishi5, Kunihiro Yamagata6, Masaomi Nangaku7, Takashi Wada8, Yukari Uemura9, Yasuo Ohashi10, Hideki Hirakata11. 1. Department of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan. tsuruya@naramed-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. 3. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Aoba Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Division of Nephrology and Kidney Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 6. Division of Clinical Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 7. Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 8. Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. 9. Biostatistics Section, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 10. Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Society, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan. 11. Fukuoka Renal Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence regarding appropriate target hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsiveness. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study in non-dialysis dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) patients with ESA-hyporesponsiveness, comparing results of intensive versus conservative treatment to maintain hemoglobin levels. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study conducted at 89 institutions. Among NDD-CKD patients, those with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia were randomly assigned to an intensive treatment group, to which epoetin beta pegol was administered with target hemoglobin level of 11 g/dL or higher, or conservative treatment group, in which the hemoglobin levels at enrollment (within ± 1 g/dL) were maintained. The primary endpoint was the time to the first kidney composite event defined as (1) transition to renal replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation); (2) reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to less than 6.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; or (3) reduction of eGFR by 30% or more. Secondary endpoints were kidney function (change rate in eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) events, and safety. RESULTS:Between August 2012 and December 2015, 385 patients were registered, and 362 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. There was no significant difference in kidney survival or in CV events between the two groups. However, the incidences of the 3 types of kidney composite events tended to differ. CONCLUSIONS: In NDD-CKD patients with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia, the aggressive administration of ESA did not clearly extend kidney survival or result in a significant difference in the incidence of CV events.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence regarding appropriate target hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsiveness. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study in non-dialysis dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) patients with ESA-hyporesponsiveness, comparing results of intensive versus conservative treatment to maintain hemoglobin levels. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study conducted at 89 institutions. Among NDD-CKDpatients, those with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia were randomly assigned to an intensive treatment group, to which epoetin beta pegol was administered with target hemoglobin level of 11 g/dL or higher, or conservative treatment group, in which the hemoglobin levels at enrollment (within ± 1 g/dL) were maintained. The primary endpoint was the time to the first kidney composite event defined as (1) transition to renal replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation); (2) reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to less than 6.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; or (3) reduction of eGFR by 30% or more. Secondary endpoints were kidney function (change rate in eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) events, and safety. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and December 2015, 385 patients were registered, and 362 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. There was no significant difference in kidney survival or in CV events between the two groups. However, the incidences of the 3 types of kidney composite events tended to differ. CONCLUSIONS: In NDD-CKDpatients with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia, the aggressive administration of ESA did not clearly extend kidney survival or result in a significant difference in the incidence of CV events.
Authors: M Ángeles Guerrero-Riscos; Rafael Montes-Delgado; María Seda-Guzmán; Juan M Praena-Fernández Journal: Nefrologia Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 2.033