| Literature DB >> 33410779 |
Vilena Kašuba1, Mirta Milić1, Davor Želježić1, Marin Mladinić2, Alica Pizent3, Zorana Kljaković-Gašpić3, Melita Balija4, Irena Jukić4.
Abstract
Manufacture of lead-containing products has long been associated with various health risks. To get an insight into the related genotoxic risks, we conducted a biomonitoring study in 50 exposed workers and 48 matched controls using a battery of endpoints that sensitively detect the extent of genome instability in peripheral blood lymphocytes. The levels of primary DNA damage were estimated with the alkaline comet assay, while cytogenetic abnormalities were determined with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay. Additionally, CBMN slides of 20 exposed and 16 control participants were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), coupled with pancentromeric probes to establish the incidence of centromere-positive micronuclei, nuclear buds, and nucleoplasmic bridges. Blood lead levels (B-Pb) were measured with atomic absorption spectrometry. To further characterise cumulative effects of occupational exposure, we measured erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) concentrations and delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) activity in blood. We also assessed the influence of serum folate (S-folate) and vitamin B12 (S-B12) on genome stability. Compared to controls, occupationally exposed workers demonstrated significantly higher B-Pb (298.36±162.07 vs 41.58±23.02), MN frequency (18.71±11.06 vs 8.98±7.50), centromere positive MN (C+ MN) (8.15±1.8 vs 3.69±0.47), and centromere negative MN (C- MN) (14.55±1.80 vs 4.56±0.89). Exposed women had significantly higher comet tail intensity (TI) and length (TL) than control women. Furthermore, workers showed a positive correlation between age and nuclear buds and MN, between MN and years of exposure, and between S-B12 levels and TI and ALAD activity, while a negative correlation was found between TI and B-Pb. These findings suggest that occupational settings in the manufacture of lead-containing products pose significant genotoxic risks, which calls for developing more effective work safety programmes, including periodical monitoring of B-Pb and genetic endpoints.Entities:
Keywords: MN-FISH; blood lead; genetic endpoints; genome damage; human lymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33410779 PMCID: PMC7968510 DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arh Hig Rada Toksikol ISSN: 0004-1254 Impact factor: 2.078
General characteristics of lead-exposed workers and controls
| Parameters (mean ± SE) | Exposed group (N=50) | Control group (N=48) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 38.34±9.71 | 38.65±1.53 |
| Years of exposure | 10.36±8.94 | 0 |
| B-PB (μg/L) | 41.58±23.02 | |
| ALAD (U/L ercs) | 56.32±9.92 | |
| EP (μmol/L ercs) | 0.98±0.27 | |
| S-B12 (ng/L) | 446.25±137.98 | 473.08±166.99 |
| S-folate (ng/L) | 7.69±3.70 |
Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. ALAD – delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity; B-Pb – blood lead concentrations; EP – blood erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentrations; ercs – erythrocytes; S-B12 – serum vitamin B12 concentrations; SE – standard error; S-folate – serum folate concentrations
General characteristics of lead-exposed workers and controls by gender and smoking
| Exposed group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters (mean±SE) | Women (N=17) | Men (N=33) | Smokers (N=33) | Non-smokers (N=17) | Women (N=18) | Men (N=30) | Smokers (N=26) | Non-smokers (N=22) |
| Age (years) | 36±2.57 | 40±1.57 | 36.55±1.75 | 41.8242.0 | 35.17±2.49 | 40.73±1.87 | 37.15±2.27 | 40.41±1.98 |
| Years of exposure | 5.05±1.42 | 13.39±1.60 | 9.98±1.51 | 11.07±2.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B-(μPB g/L) | 47.16±5.01 | 40.49 | 43.14±4.22 | |||||
| ALAD (U/L ercs) | 55.84±2.81 | 56.61±2.61 | 57.85±2.62 | 53.27±2.15 | ||||
| EP (μmol/L ercs) | 0.98±0.08 | 0.98±0.06 | 1.03±0.07 | 0.9±0.06 | ||||
| S-B 12 (μg/L) | 467.55±25.81 | 445.93±26.69 | 446.93±33.05 | 537.33±46.75 | 434.53±24.52 | 447.38±30 | 503.45±38.38 | |
| S-folate (ng/L) | 5.61±0.42 | 9.11±0.86 | 6.84±0.64 | 7.18±0.56 | 8.30±0.96 | |||
Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney test) are in bold typeface. b – control women vs control men; c – exposed women vs exposed men; d – control women vs exposed women; a – exposed men vs control men; f – exposed smokers vs exposed non-smokers; g – exposed smokers vs control smokers; h – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. ALAD – delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity; B-Pb – blood lead concentrations; EP – blood erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentrations; eras – erythrocytes; S-B12 – serum vitamin B12 concentrations; SE – standard error; S-folate – serum folate concentrations
Micronucleus assay and alkaline comet assay endpoints in lead-exposed workers and controls by gender and smoking
| Parameters (mean±SE) | Total MNi | NDI | TL | TI | Total NBs | Total NPBs | NPB/MN ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed (N=50) | 16.15±5.33 | 2.64±3.22 | 3.65±5.91 | 0.12±0.02 | |||
| Controls (N=48) | 8.98±7.50 | 2.13±0.25 | 14.27±1.23 | 1.61±0.74 | 2.29±2.34 | 1.14±1.53 | 0.26±0.08 |
| Control (N=18) W | 8.11±1.72 | 2.22±0.06 | |||||
| Control (N=30) M | 9.5±1.41 | 2.07±0.05 | 14.67±0.25 | 1.79±0.14 | |||
| Exposed (N=17) W | 2.16±0.07 | ||||||
| Exposed (N=33) M | 16.20±0.99 | 2.46±0.53 | |||||
| Control N=( | 9.27±1.59 | 2.13±0.05 | |||||
| Control (N=22) NS | 8.64±1.47 | 2.14±0.05 | |||||
| Exposed (N=33) S | |||||||
| Exposed (N=17) NS |
Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. a – controls vs exposed workers; b – control women vs control men; d – control women vs exposed women; e – exposed men vs control men; f – exposed smokers vs exposed non-smokers; g – exposed smokers vs control smokers; h – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. M – men; MNi – micronuclei; NBs – nuclear buds; NDI – nuclear division index; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; NS – non-smokers; S– smokers; SE – standard error; TI– tail intensity; TL – tail length; W – women
MN-FISH assay endpoints in lead-exposed and control subgroups
| Parameters (mean±SE) | Exposed group N=20 | Control group N=16 |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 39.6±2.05 | 40.31±1.59 |
| Gender | 8 women 12 men | 5 women 11 men |
| Smoking | 12 smokers 8 non-smokers | 10 smokers 6 non-smokers |
| Time of exposure (years) | 11.66±1.91 | 0 |
| MNtotal | 8.25±0.84 | |
| C+ MNtotal | 3.69±0.47 | |
| C- MNtotal | 4.56±0.89 | |
| NBtotal | 2.75±0.53 | 4.18±1.01 |
| C+ NBtotal | 0.35±0.21 | 0.75±0.28 |
| C- NBtotal | 2.40±0.41 | 3.43±0.74 |
| NPBtotal | 0.38±0.15 | |
| C+ NPBtotal | 0.05±0.05 | 0 |
| C- NPBtotal | 0.38±0.15 |
Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. C + MN – MN with centromeric signal; C- MN – MN without centromeric signal; C+ NB – NB with centromeric signal; C- NB – NB without centromeric signal; C+ NPB– NPB with centromeric signal; C- NPB – NPB without centromeric signal; MN – micronucleus; NBs – nuclear buds; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; SE – standard error
MN-FISH assay endpoints in lead-exposed and control subgroups by gender and smoking status
| Exposed group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters (mean±SE) | Women (N=8) | Men (N=12) | Smokers (N=12) | Non-smokers (N=8) | Women (N=5) | Men (N=11) | Smokers (N=10) | Non-smokers (N=6) |
| MNtotal | 22.38±2.33 | 22.92±3.53 | 24.08±3.17 | 20.14±2.78 | ||||
| C+ MNtotal | 7.42±1.38 | 8.46±1.30 | 7.57±2.45 | 4.27±0.59 | ||||
| C- MNtotal | 13.13±2.00 | 15.5±2.72 | 15.62±2.52 | 12.57±2.17 | 4.73±1.15 | |||
| NBtotal | 2.67±0.81 | 2.85±0.77 | 2.57±0.61 | 2.4±1.12 | 5.00±1.33 | 5±1.48 | 2.83±1.01 | |
| C+NBtotal | 0.13±0.13 | 0.5±0.34 | 0.46±0.31 | 0.14±0.14 | 0.2±0.2 | 1±0.38 | 1±0.42 | 0.33±0.21 |
| C-NBtotal | 2.75±0.56 | 2.17±0.58 | 2.38±0.57 | 2.43±0.53 | 2.2±0.97 | 4±0.96 | 4±1.06 | 2.5±0.85 |
| NPBtotal | 1.5±0.42 | 2±0.85 | 1.69±0.58 | 2±1.13 | 0.6±0.4 | 0.27±0.14 | 0.5±0.22 | 0.17±0.17 |
| C+NPBtotal | 0.13±0.13 | 0 | 0.08±0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C-NPBtotal | 1.38±0.46 | 2±0.85 | 1.62±0.59 | 2±1.13 | 0.6±0.4 | 0.27±0.14 | 0.5±0.22 | 0.17±0.17 |
Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. b exposed men vs exposed women; c control women vs exposed women; d control men vs exposed men; e – control non-smokers vs control smokers; f – exposed smokers vs control smokers; g – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. C+ MN – MN with centromeric signal; C- MN – MN without centromeric signal; C+ NB – NB with centromeric signal; C- NB – NB without centromeric signal; C+ NPB– NPB with centromeric signal; C- NPB – NPB without centromeric signal; MN – micronucleus; NBs – nuclear buds; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; SE – standard error