Sreenivasa Murthy1, Pankaj Aneja2, Arthur Joseph Asirvatham3, Lise Lotte N Husemoen4, Nicolai A Rhee5, Jothydev Kesavadev6. 1. LifeCare Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. drsreenivasamurthy@gmail.com. 2. Max Super Speciality Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India. 3. Arthur Asirvatham Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark. 5. Novo Nordisk Health Care AG, Zurich, Switzerland. 6. Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen (FlexPen® or Penfill® device) in patients in India with T2DM previously treated with biphasic human insulin (BHI) in vials and believed to be able to pay for treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients willing to continue to pay for BIAsp 30 after 12 weeks' treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in treatment and device satisfaction and patient preferences for treatment attributes as assessed by a nested discrete-choice experiment. RESULTS: Overall, 54.9% (n = 277/505) of participants were male; the mean age was 56.4 years; diabetes duration was 10.9 years; 63.8% had a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2; > 75% had an annual household income > 150,000 Indian rupees (INR). After 12 weeks' treatment, 96.4% of patients were willing to pay for BIAsp 30. Mean treatment and device satisfaction significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients were willing to pay INR3576 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2755-4398) for improved glycemic control, INR688 (95% CI 383-994) for a device upgrade (vial/syringe to an insulin pen), or INR327 (95% CI 95-560) to avoid major hypoglycemia. Patients would need to be compensated INR44 (95% CI 56-32) per minor hypoglycemic event. CONCLUSIONS: In India, patients with T2DM previously treated with BHI were willing to pay for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen. Furthermore, treatment and device satisfaction improved after this therapeutic switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03374774.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an insulinpen (FlexPen® or Penfill® device) in patients in India with T2DM previously treated with biphasic humaninsulin (BHI) in vials and believed to be able to pay for treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients willing to continue to pay for BIAsp 30 after 12 weeks' treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in treatment and device satisfaction and patient preferences for treatment attributes as assessed by a nested discrete-choice experiment. RESULTS: Overall, 54.9% (n = 277/505) of participants were male; the mean age was 56.4 years; diabetes duration was 10.9 years; 63.8% had a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2; > 75% had an annual household income > 150,000 Indian rupees (INR). After 12 weeks' treatment, 96.4% of patients were willing to pay for BIAsp 30. Mean treatment and device satisfaction significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients were willing to pay INR3576 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2755-4398) for improved glycemic control, INR688 (95% CI 383-994) for a device upgrade (vial/syringe to an insulinpen), or INR327 (95% CI 95-560) to avoid major hypoglycemia. Patients would need to be compensated INR44 (95% CI 56-32) per minor hypoglycemic event. CONCLUSIONS: In India, patients with T2DM previously treated with BHI were willing to pay for BIAsp 30 in an insulinpen. Furthermore, treatment and device satisfaction improved after this therapeutic switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03374774.
Authors: N H Cho; J E Shaw; S Karuranga; Y Huang; J D da Rocha Fernandes; A W Ohlrogge; B Malanda Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Andreas Pfützner; Timothy Bailey; Carlos Campos; Douglas Kahn; Ellen Ambers; Marcus Niemeyer; German Guerrero; David Klonoff; Irina Nayberg Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Philip Home; Matthew Riddle; William T Cefalu; Clifford J Bailey; Reinhard G Bretzel; Stefano Del Prato; Derek Leroith; Guntram Schernthaner; Luc van Gaal; Itamar Raz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Viswanathan Mohan; Siddharth N Shah; Shashank R Joshi; V Seshiah; Binode Kumar Sahay; Samar Banerjee; Subhash Kumar Wangnoo; Ajay Kumar; Sanjay Kalra; A G Unnikrishnan; Surendra Kumar Sharma; P V Rao; Shahid Akhtar; Raman V Shetty; Ashok Kumar Das Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-05