Ilhan Ece1, Huseyin Yilmaz2, Serdar Yormaz2, Bayram Çolak2, Akin Calisir2, Mustafa Sahin2. 1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Selcuklu, 42075, Konya, Turkey. ilhanece@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Selcuklu, 42075, Konya, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative metabolic and nutritional outcomes after transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TB-SG) and distal-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (D-RYGB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of 109 morbidly obese patients who underwent TB-SG or D-RYGB. Primary outcomes included metabolic variables such as glycemic control and serum lipid levels, and secondary outcomes consisted of nutritional deficiencies and weight loss after surgical procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 83 and 26 patients underwent D-RYGB and TB-SG, respectively. The preoperative characteristics and nutritional status of the groups were similar. D-RYGB resulted in significantly higher weight loss rates in the first 3 months, but the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL %) was not different in the 12-month follow-up period. Although D-RYGB provided faster glycemic control due to early weight loss, there was no difference between the two groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the TB-SG was associated with significantly less deficiency of vitamin D, vitamin B12, iron, and folic acid. Anastomosis leakage was more common in the D-RYGB technique. The overall complication rates of the groups were similar. CONCLUSION: TB-SG is a safe and effective alternative to D-RYGB for the treatment of obesity-related metabolic disorders with fewer nutritional deficiencies.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative metabolic and nutritional outcomes after transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TB-SG) and distal-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (D-RYGB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of 109 morbidly obesepatients who underwent TB-SG or D-RYGB. Primary outcomes included metabolic variables such as glycemic control and serum lipid levels, and secondary outcomes consisted of nutritional deficiencies and weight loss after surgical procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 83 and 26 patients underwent D-RYGB and TB-SG, respectively. The preoperative characteristics and nutritional status of the groups were similar. D-RYGB resulted in significantly higher weight loss rates in the first 3 months, but the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL %) was not different in the 12-month follow-up period. Although D-RYGB provided faster glycemic control due to early weight loss, there was no difference between the two groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the TB-SG was associated with significantly less deficiency of vitamin D, vitamin B12, iron, and folic acid. Anastomosis leakage was more common in the D-RYGB technique. The overall complication rates of the groups were similar. CONCLUSION:TB-SG is a safe and effective alternative to D-RYGB for the treatment of obesity-related metabolic disorders with fewer nutritional deficiencies.
Authors: Sérgio Santoro; Carlos E Malzoni; Manoel C P Velhote; Fábio Q Milleo; Marco A Santo; Sidney Klajner; Durval Damiani; João G Maksoud Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Hasan Cantay; Kenan Binnetoglu; Umut Eren Erdogdu; Yurdakul Deniz Firat; Haci Murat Cayci Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 1.817