Literature DB >> 33409961

Angiographic Scoring System for Predicting Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.

Minglian Gong1,2, Hongyu Peng2, Zheng Wu2, Wenzheng Li2, Yun Lv2, Yuan Lv2, Ze Zheng2, Tao An3, Jing Zhang1, Mingrui Lv1, Xin Li1, Hangyu Gong4, Yi Mao5, Jinghua Liu6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a scoring model to predict the technical success of recanalizing via antegrade approach in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We retrospectively collected data from 474 patients who underwent an uneasy IS-CTO PCI via antegrade approach from January 2015 to December 2018, consecutively. We selected clinical and angiographic factors and utilized a derivation and validation cohort (4:1 sampling ratio) analysis. Factors with strong correlations with technical failure, according to multivariable analysis, were assigned 1 point, and a scoring system with a 4-point maximum was established. The model was then validated with a validation cohort. The overall procedural success rate was 77.4%. On multivariable analysis, the factors that correlated with technical failure were proximal bending (beta coefficient [β] = 2.142), tortuosity (β = 2.622), stent under expansion (β = 3.052), and poor distal landing zone (β = 2.004). The IS-CTO score demonstrated good calibration and excellent predicting capacity in the derivation (receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.973 and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared = 5.252; p = 0.072) and validation (ROC area = 0.976 and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared = 0.916; p = 0.632) cohorts. In the validation subset, the IS-CTO score demonstrated superior performance to the Japanese chronic total occlusion score (J-CTO) and PROGRESS CTO scores for predicting technical success (area under the a curve [AUC] 0.976 vs. 0.642 vs. 0.579, respectively; difference in AUC between the IS-CTO score and J-CTO score = 0.334, p < 0.01; difference in AUC between the IS-CTO score and PROGRESS score = 0.397, p < 0.01). Our results suggest that the IS-CTO score system is a helpful tool to predict the technical success of IS-CTO PCI via antegrade approach in china. Graphical Abstract.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-stent chronic total occlusion; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Predicting factor; Scoring system

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33409961     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-020-10090-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  2 in total

1.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Steven R Bailey; John A Bittl; Bojan Cercek; Charles E Chambers; Stephen G Ellis; Robert A Guyton; Steven M Hollenberg; Umesh N Khot; Richard A Lange; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Issam D Moussa; Debabrata Mukherjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Management of total restenotic occlusions.

Authors:  Gerald S Werner; Hiller Moehlis; Karlheinz Tischer
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.534

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhang; Zheng Wu; Shaoping Wang; Tong Liu; Jinghua Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.947

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.