Literature DB >> 33409929

Genetic evaluation of patients and families with concern for hereditary endocrine tumor syndromes.

Jennifer L Anderson1, Robert Pilarski2, Lawrence Kirschner3, Pamela Brock4.   

Abstract

Hereditary endocrine tumor syndromes are rare conditions with overlapping features. It is imperative that healthcare providers differentiate between these syndromes for proper patient care. Advances in genetic testing technologies have increased utilization of genetic counseling and testing in this field; however, few endocrine cancer genetics clinics exist. Two years ago, a genetic counselor (GC) specializing in endocrine cancer genetics was added to the multidisciplinary team of the James Neuroendocrine/Thyroid Clinic at The Ohio State University. Here, we report on this experience. In total, 358 patients were seen. The majority were referred by medical oncology (n = 204; 57%) for a personal history of disease (n = 249; 81%). The most common referral indications were pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (n = 44; 17%), multiple primary tumors (n = 37; 14%), and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (n = 35; 14%). Most patients completed genetic testing after genetic counseling (n = 200; 65%). Targeted gene panel testing was the most common testing ordered (n = 98; 32%). Thirty-one patients (15.5%) had ≥ one likely pathogenic variant (LPV) or pathogenic variant (PV) identified. Approximately 37% (n = 11) did not meet genetic testing guidelines for the gene they tested positive for. The most common genes with LPV/PVs were the SDH genes (n = 8) and MEN1 (n = 7). Referral indications with the highest likelihood of LPV/PVs were paraganglioma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and multiple primary tumors. We believe this data can provide valuable guidance to healthcare providers who see patients with endocrine neoplasia or who are seeking to establish hereditary endocrine cancer clinics.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Endocrine; Genetic; Hereditary; Neoplasia; Tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33409929     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00222-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  6 in total

1.  Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Prospective study of germline genetic testing in incident cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Randall Brand; Erkut Borazanci; Virginia Speare; Beth Dudley; Eve Karloski; Mary Linton B Peters; Lindsey Stobie; Nathan Bahary; Herbert Zeh; Amer Zureikat; Melissa Hogg; Kenneth Lee; Allan Tsung; John Rhee; James Ohr; Weijing Sun; James Lee; A James Moser; Kim DeLeonardis; Jill Krejdovsky; Emily Dalton; Holly LaDuca; Jill Dolinsky; Arlene Colvin; Cynthia Lim; Mary Helen Black; Nadine Tung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Improvement in the care of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 through a regional multidisciplinary clinic.

Authors:  H D White; J Blair; J Pinkney; D J Cuthbertson; R Day; A Weber; I A MacFarlane
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2010-03-15

4.  Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant prevalence among the first 10,000 patients referred for next-generation cancer panel testing.

Authors:  Lisa R Susswein; Megan L Marshall; Rachel Nusbaum; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Scott M Weissman; Lauren Yackowski; Erica M Vaccari; Jeffrey Bissonnette; Jessica K Booker; M Laura Cremona; Federica Gibellini; Patricia D Murphy; Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez; Guido D Pollevick; Zhixiong Xu; Gabi Richard; Sherri Bale; Rachel T Klein; Kathleen S Hruska; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Hereditary breast cancer: the era of new susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Paraskevi Apostolou; Florentia Fostira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.