Veronica Di Carlo1, Jacques Estève2, Christopher Johnson3, Fabio Girardi1, Hannah K Weir4, Reda J Wilson4, Pamela Minicozzi1, Rosemary D Cress5, Charles F Lynch6, Karen S Pawlish7, Judith R Rees8, Michel P Coleman1, Claudia Allemani1. 1. Cancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Biostatistique, Lyon Cedex 03, France. 3. Cancer Data Registry of Idaho, Boise, ID, USA. 4. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 7. New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Survival from metastatic cutaneous melanoma is substantially lower than for localized disease. Treatments for metastatic melanoma have been limited, but remarkable clinical improvements have been reported in clinical trials in the last decade. We described the characteristics of US patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma during 2001-2013 and assessed trends in short-term survival for distant-stage disease. METHODS: Trends in 1-year net survival were estimated using the Pohar Perme estimator, controlling for background mortality with life tables of all-cause mortality rates by county of residence, single year of age, sex, and race for each year 2001-2013. We fitted a flexible parametric survival model on the log-hazard scale to estimate the effect of race on the hazard of death because of melanoma and estimated 1-year net survival by race. RESULTS: Only 4.4% of the 425 915 melanomas were diagnosed at a distant stage, cases diagnosed at a distant stage are more commonly men, older patients, and African Americans. Age-standardized, 1-year net survival for distant-stage disease was stable at approximately 43% during 2001-2010. From 2010 onward, survival improved rapidly, reaching 58.9% (95% confidence interval = 56.6% to 61.2%) for patients diagnosed in 2013. Younger patients experienced the largest improvement. Survival for distant-stage disease increased in both Blacks and Whites but was consistently lower in Blacks. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival for distant-stage melanoma improved during 2001-2013, particularly in younger patients and those diagnosed since 2010. This improvement may be a consequence of the introduction of immune-checkpoint-inhibitors and other targeted treatments for metastatic and unresectable disease. Persistent survival inequalities exist between Blacks and Whites, suggesting differential access to treatment.
BACKGROUND: Survival from metastatic cutaneous melanoma is substantially lower than for localized disease. Treatments for metastatic melanoma have been limited, but remarkable clinical improvements have been reported in clinical trials in the last decade. We described the characteristics of US patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma during 2001-2013 and assessed trends in short-term survival for distant-stage disease. METHODS: Trends in 1-year net survival were estimated using the Pohar Perme estimator, controlling for background mortality with life tables of all-cause mortality rates by county of residence, single year of age, sex, and race for each year 2001-2013. We fitted a flexible parametric survival model on the log-hazard scale to estimate the effect of race on the hazard of death because of melanoma and estimated 1-year net survival by race. RESULTS: Only 4.4% of the 425 915 melanomas were diagnosed at a distant stage, cases diagnosed at a distant stage are more commonly men, older patients, and African Americans. Age-standardized, 1-year net survival for distant-stage disease was stable at approximately 43% during 2001-2010. From 2010 onward, survival improved rapidly, reaching 58.9% (95% confidence interval = 56.6% to 61.2%) for patients diagnosed in 2013. Younger patients experienced the largest improvement. Survival for distant-stage disease increased in both Blacks and Whites but was consistently lower in Blacks. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival for distant-stage melanoma improved during 2001-2013, particularly in younger patients and those diagnosed since 2010. This improvement may be a consequence of the introduction of immune-checkpoint-inhibitors and other targeted treatments for metastatic and unresectable disease. Persistent survival inequalities exist between Blacks and Whites, suggesting differential access to treatment.
Authors: Lori A Pollack; Jun Li; Zahava Berkowitz; Hannah K Weir; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Umed A Ajani; Donatus U Ekwueme; Chunyu Li; Brian P Pollack Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Alexander M M Eggermont; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Jean-Jacques Grob; Reinhard Dummer; Jedd D Wolchok; Henrik Schmidt; Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; Paolo A Ascierto; Jon M Richards; Céleste Lebbé; Virginia Ferraresi; Michael Smylie; Jeffrey S Weber; Michele Maio; Lars Bastholt; Laurent Mortier; Luc Thomas; Saad Tahir; Axel Hauschild; Jessica C Hassel; F Stephen Hodi; Corina Taitt; Veerle de Pril; Gaetan de Schaetzen; Stefan Suciu; Alessandro Testori Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Bart Neyns; Gerald Linette; Sylvie Negrier; Jose Lutzky; Luc Thomas; William Waterfield; Dirk Schadendorf; Michael Smylie; Troy Guthrie; Jean-Jacques Grob; Jason Chesney; Kevin Chin; Kun Chen; Axel Hoos; Steven J O'Day; Celeste Lebbé Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: D R Miller; A C Geller; S W Wyatt; A Halpern; J B Howell; C Cockerell; B A Reilley; B A Bewerse; D Rigel; L Rosenthal; R Amonette; T Sun; T Grossbart; R A Lew; H K Koh Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Krishnaraj Mahendraraj; Komal Sidhu; Christine S M Lau; Georgia J McRoy; Ronald S Chamberlain; Franz O Smith Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Elizabeth Ann L Enninga; Justin C Moser; Amy L Weaver; Svetomir N Markovic; Jerry D Brewer; Alexey A Leontovich; Tina J Hieken; Lynne Shuster; Lisa A Kottschade; Ariadna Olariu; Aaron S Mansfield; Roxana S Dronca Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Melissa Ward-Peterson; Juan M Acuña; Mohammed K Alkhalifah; Abdulrahman M Nasiri; Elharith S Al-Akeel; Talal M Alkhaldi; Sakhr A Dawari; Sami A Aldaham Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889