Literature DB >> 33409150

Expression and Prognostic Significance of Metastasis-Associated Protein 1 in Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Pengping Li1,2, Wei Cao1, Rui Ding1,3, Mengqiu Cheng1, Xin Xu1, Sihan Chen1, Bo Chen1, Guodong Cao1, Maoming Xiong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) has been considered as a transcriptional regulator, which is significantly related to the prognosis in various types of tumors. However, whether MTA1 is a potential prognostic index of gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) remains controversial. The current meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the role of MTA1 expression in the prediction of the clinicopathological features and survival in GIC cases. And the results of gastric cancer were verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
METHODS: Eligible studies assessing the relationship between MTA1 and GIC by IHC were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, Web of Science and CNKI databases by various search strategies. The STATA 16.0 software was applied to gather data and to analyze the potential relationship between MTA1 and GIC. The expression level of MTA1 was examined in 80 GC samples by IHC assay. SPSS 20.0 was applied for statistical analysis, and the survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The data of 95% CI was displayed as "[a-b]".
RESULTS: According to the meta-analysis, the expression level of MTA1 was tightly associated with the tumor size (OR=1.82 [1.16-2.84], P=0.009), tumor tissue differentiation (OR=1.71 [1.24-2.37], P=0.001), depth of invasion (OR=3.12 [2.55-3.83], P<0.001), lymphatic metastasis (OR=2.99 [2.02-4.43], P<0.001), distant metastasis (OR=4.66 [1.13-19.24], P=0.034), TNM stage (OR=4.28 [2.76-6.63], P<0.001). In addition, MTA1 played the negative effects in 1- (RR=2.48 [1.45-4.25], P=0.001), 3- (RR=1.66 [1.30-2.11], P<0.001) and 5-year (RR=1.73 [1.37-2.20], P<0.001). Study in subgroup, grouped by language and tumor type, we reached similar conclusions. Further validation by IHC yielded similar conclusions. Tumor size (P=0.008), lymph node metastasis (P=0.007) and distant metastasis (P=0.023) significantly accompanied with higher expression of MAT1 in GC cases. Besides, the expression level of MTA1 was statistically significantly correlated with OS in GC cases (HR=2.061 [1.066-3.986], P=0.032), which suggested that MTA1 might be an independent prognostic marker for GC. Finally, we verified the correlation between the expression level of MTA1 and prognosis of GC in 80 GC samples.
CONCLUSIONS: MTA1 is tightly associated with metastasis-related factors and may constitute a promising prognostic factor of GIC.
Copyright © 2020 Li, Cao, Ding, Cheng, Xu, Chen, Chen, Cao and Xiong.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastrointestinal cancer; immunohistochemistry; meta-analysis; metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1); prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33409150      PMCID: PMC7780747          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.542330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  39 in total

1.  Metastasis-associated protein 1 nuclear expression is closely associated with tumor progression and angiogenesis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Hai Li; Hui Tian; Wei-Ming Yue; Lin Li; Cun Gao; Wen-Jun Li; Wen-Si Hu; Bin Hao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Clinical Significance and Phenotype of MTA1 Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Honjo; Yasushi Toh; Makoto Sohda; Shigemasa Suzuki; Kyoichi Kaira; Yoshikatsu Kanai; Shushi Nagamori; Tetsunari Oyama; Takehiko Yokobori; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Expression of histone deacetylase 1 and metastasis-associated protein 1 as prognostic factors in colon cancer.

Authors:  Jun Higashijima; Nobuhiro Kurita; Tomohiko Miyatani; Kozo Yoshikawa; Shinya Morimoto; Masanori Nishioka; Takashi Iwata; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Associations between the expression of MTA1 and VEGF-C in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph angiogenesis and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Jianping Liu; Juan Xia; Yongheng Zhang; Maoyong Fu; Sheng Gong; Yulong Guo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  MTA3, a Mi-2/NuRD complex subunit, regulates an invasive growth pathway in breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoyuki Fujita; David L Jaye; Masahiro Kajita; Cissy Geigerman; Carlos S Moreno; Paul A Wade
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  CD24 expression is a novel prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Akihiko Sano; Hiroyuki Kato; Shinji Sakurai; Makoto Sakai; Naritaka Tanaka; Takanori Inose; Kana Saito; Makoto Sohda; Masanobu Nakajima; Takashi Nakajima; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Expression of the metastasis-associated MTA1 protein and its relationship to deacetylation of the histone H4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yasushi Toh; Takefumi Ohga; Kazuya Endo; Eisuke Adachi; Hiroki Kusumoto; Masaru Haraguchi; Takeshi Okamura; Garth L Nicolson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Validation of staging systems for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keishi Yamashita; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Shiroh Kikuchi; Natsuya Katada; Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 9.  Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization.

Authors:  Don X Nguyen; Paula D Bos; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  HER3, but Not HER4, Plays an Essential Role in the Clinicopathology and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guo-Dong Cao; Ke Chen; Mao-Ming Xiong; Bo Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.