| Literature DB >> 33408429 |
Axel Petzold1,2, Valerie Biousse3, Lulu Bursztyn4, Fiona Costello5, Alison Crum6, Kathleen Digre7, Clare Fraser8, J Alex Fraser9, Bradley Katz6, Neringa Jurkute10, Nancy Newman11, Jette Lautrup-Battistini12, Mitchell Lawlor8, Petra Liskova13, Birgit Lorenz14, Lasse Malmqvist15, Jason Peragallo3, Patrick Sibony16, Prem Subramanian17, Robert Rejdak18, Katarzyna Nowomiejska18, Valerie Touitou19, Judith Warner20, Marianne Wegener15, Sui Wong21, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man22,23, Steffen Hamann24.
Abstract
Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) are a new retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) finding. The Optic Disc Drusen Studies Consortium had made recommendations to distinguish PHOMS from true optic disc drusen (ODD) in 2018. While publications on PHOMS have increased since then, the accuracy of the definition of PHOMS and reliability of detection is unknown. In this multi-rater study, we demonstrate that the 2018 definition of PHOMS resulted in a poor multi-rater kappa of 0.356. We performed a Delphi consensus process to develop a consistent and refined definition of PHOMS with clear principles around the nature of PHOMS and how they differ from normal anatomy. Fifty explanatory teaching slides, provided as supplementary material, allowed our expert group of raters to achieve a good level of agreement (kappa 0.701, 50 OCT scans, 21 raters). We recommend adopting the refined definition for PHOMS.Keywords: OCT; ODD; PHOMS
Year: 2020 PMID: 33408429 PMCID: PMC7746256 DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroophthalmology ISSN: 0165-8107