Raymond Javan Chan1, Stephanie Buhagiar2, Laisa Teleni3, Camilla Simonsen4, Jane Turner5, Courtney Rawson4, Nicolas H Hart6, Lee Jones3, Louisa Gordon7, Ria Joseph8, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule3, Fiona Henderson2, Joel Rhee9, Marissa Ryan2, Christine Carrington2, Sally Mapp4. 1. Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Raymond.Chan@qut.edu.au. 2. Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 6. Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 7. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 8. Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 9. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma. METHODS: We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma. METHODS: We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hematology; Lymphoma; Protocol; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; Shared care
Authors: U Vitolo; J F Seymour; M Martelli; G Illerhaus; T Illidge; E Zucca; E Campo; M Ladetto Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Raymond Chan; Bruce Cooper; Steven Paul; Yvette Conley; Kord Kober; Bogda Koczwara; Alexandre Chan; Chia Jie Tan; Louisa Gordon; Lebogang Thomy; Jon Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.633
Authors: Shawna V Hudson; Suzanne M Miller; Jennifer Hemler; Jeanne M Ferrante; Jennifer Lyle; Kevin C Oeffinger; Robert S Dipaola Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Raymond Javan Chan; Bruce Cooper; Bogda Koczwara; Alexandre Chan; Chia Jie Tan; Steven M Paul; Laura B Dunn; Yvette P Conley; Kord M Kober; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 3.603