BACKGROUND: MEN1 is a complex, rare, syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant tract and characterized by the development of multiple neuroendocrine tumors, requiring lifelong surveillance and multiple medical and surgical therapies throughout the patient's life. For all these reasons, a diagnosis of MEN1 can be a psychological shock for the patient, as well as his/her relatives, more so than the diagnosis of a single tumor. In the last two decades, clinicians have started to consider the emotional, psychological, relational, and social aspects of their patients' lives. The data collected in the present analyses highlight the unique features of MEN1 syndrome, and aim to evaluate the Quality of Life in the patients and their relatives. In this study, a comprehensive survey of various aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life was performed in a large series of Italian MEN1 patients, by administering five of the most common targeted questionnaires. RESULTS: The results of the study showed that our patients, despite having a complex multi-tumor syndrome, were moderately optimistic (50%), and this corresponds with a normal Quality of Life. This positive response is strictly correlated with the fact that the patients are cared for at a dedicated Referral Center, receiving personalized care and constant follow-up, which gives them reassurance regarding the high quality of management of the disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of having access to a clinical Referral Center for their complex rare disease, together with the support of a dedicated patient association, has been demonstrated to be the ideal model for the management of post-diagnosis shock, and contributes to the preservation of a good Health-Related Quality of Life for MEN1 patients.
BACKGROUND:MEN1 is a complex, rare, syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant tract and characterized by the development of multiple neuroendocrine tumors, requiring lifelong surveillance and multiple medical and surgical therapies throughout the patient's life. For all these reasons, a diagnosis of MEN1 can be a psychological shock for the patient, as well as his/her relatives, more so than the diagnosis of a single tumor. In the last two decades, clinicians have started to consider the emotional, psychological, relational, and social aspects of their patients' lives. The data collected in the present analyses highlight the unique features of MEN1 syndrome, and aim to evaluate the Quality of Life in the patients and their relatives. In this study, a comprehensive survey of various aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life was performed in a large series of Italian MEN1patients, by administering five of the most common targeted questionnaires. RESULTS: The results of the study showed that our patients, despite having a complex multi-tumor syndrome, were moderately optimistic (50%), and this corresponds with a normal Quality of Life. This positive response is strictly correlated with the fact that the patients are cared for at a dedicated Referral Center, receiving personalized care and constant follow-up, which gives them reassurance regarding the high quality of management of the disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of having access to a clinical Referral Center for their complex rare disease, together with the support of a dedicated patient association, has been demonstrated to be the ideal model for the management of post-diagnosis shock, and contributes to the preservation of a good Health-Related Quality of Life for MEN1patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
HADS; IES-R; LOT-R; Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; Neuroendocrine tumors; Quality of life; SF-36
Authors: Rajesh V Thakker; Paul J Newey; Gerard V Walls; John Bilezikian; Henning Dralle; Peter R Ebeling; Shlomo Melmed; Akihiro Sakurai; Francesco Tonelli; Maria Luisa Brandi Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A E Raczek; J E Ware; J B Bjorner; B Gandek; S M Haley; N K Aaronson; G Apolone; P Bech; J E Brazier; M Bullinger; M Sullivan Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Andreas Hinz; Christian Sander; Heide Glaesmer; Elmar Brähler; Markus Zenger; Anja Hilbert; Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent Journal: Int J Clin Health Psychol Date: 2017-03-31
Authors: Cristina García-Bravo; Domingo Palacios-Ceña; Sara García-Bravo; Jorge Pérez-Corrales; Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres; Rosa Mª Martínez-Piédrola Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 4.614