Lidia Gómez1,2, Sergio Verd3,4, Gloria de-la-Banda5, Esther Cardo6,7, Mateu Servera5, Ana Filgueira7, Jaume Ponce-Taylor8, Margarita Mulet9. 1. Department of Child Psychiatry, Son Espases Hospital, Valldemossa road, 07120, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 2. Baleares Medical Research Council (IdISBa), Valldemossa road, 07120, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 3. Baleares Medical Research Council (IdISBa), Valldemossa road, 07120, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. drsverd@gmail.com. 4. Pediatric Unit, La Vileta Surgery, Department of Primary Care, Matamusinos street, 07013, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. drsverd@gmail.com. 5. Department of Psychology, Baleares Islands University, Valldemossa road, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 6. Pediatric Unit, La Vileta Surgery, Department of Primary Care, Matamusinos street, 07013, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 7. Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Son Llatzer, Manacor road, 07128, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 8. Accidents & Emergency Unit, Department of Primary Care, Illes Balears street., 07014, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 9. Mental Health Unit, Department of Primary Care, Simo Tort street, 07500, Mallorca, Manacor, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emotional distress in mothers inhibits the let-down reflex, thus affecting breastfeeding self-efficacy. A breastfeeding mother may have to cope with both physical discomfort and psychological distress. However, literature on initiatives to improve breastfeeding rates has focused mainly on providing community-based peer support, or social policies. The aim of this review is to assess evidence on the effectiveness of a broad range of psychological interventions to facilitate breastfeeding for mothers facing difficulties around the time of delivery. METHODS: The review of the literature is derived from a search on Cochrane Library, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and PsycINFO for papers published since 1980. The approach was to explore quantitative and qualitative parameters. Quantitative parameters included breastfeeding initiation, duration, and composition. Qualitative parameters recorded the evaluation of maternal perceptions on breastfeeding success. The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review; 20 selected papers that report on breastfeeding outcomes and psychological programs met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The evidence on breastfeeding support through psychotherapy is heterogeneous and scant. Out of the included studies, 11 were randomized controlled trials, two were non-randomised trials, and two used a quasi-experimental design. None of the studies reported an increase in adverse breastfeeding outcomes. Three studies failed to report an association between psychological procedures and improved breastfeeding outcomes. A literature review showed that 17 (85%) analyses support stress-releasing techniques to facilitate breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that relaxation interventions carefully tailored to address perinatal emotional distress may lead to important health benefits, including improvement in breastfeeding outcomes. There is also some indication that psychotherapy support while breastfeeding may have more impact than routine counselling. Conversely, this review did not find an association between self-hypnosis and breastfeeding outcomes. Data from this study can be used in designing prevention programs and future research with appropriate theoretical underpinning.
BACKGROUND: Emotional distress in mothers inhibits the let-down reflex, thus affecting breastfeeding self-efficacy. A breastfeeding mother may have to cope with both physical discomfort and psychological distress. However, literature on initiatives to improve breastfeeding rates has focused mainly on providing community-based peer support, or social policies. The aim of this review is to assess evidence on the effectiveness of a broad range of psychological interventions to facilitate breastfeeding for mothers facing difficulties around the time of delivery. METHODS: The review of the literature is derived from a search on Cochrane Library, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and PsycINFO for papers published since 1980. The approach was to explore quantitative and qualitative parameters. Quantitative parameters included breastfeeding initiation, duration, and composition. Qualitative parameters recorded the evaluation of maternal perceptions on breastfeeding success. The high heterogeneity of the studies led to a narrative review; 20 selected papers that report on breastfeeding outcomes and psychological programs met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The evidence on breastfeeding support through psychotherapy is heterogeneous and scant. Out of the included studies, 11 were randomized controlled trials, two were non-randomised trials, and two used a quasi-experimental design. None of the studies reported an increase in adverse breastfeeding outcomes. Three studies failed to report an association between psychological procedures and improved breastfeeding outcomes. A literature review showed that 17 (85%) analyses support stress-releasing techniques to facilitate breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that relaxation interventions carefully tailored to address perinatal emotional distress may lead to important health benefits, including improvement in breastfeeding outcomes. There is also some indication that psychotherapy support while breastfeeding may have more impact than routine counselling. Conversely, this review did not find an association between self-hypnosis and breastfeeding outcomes. Data from this study can be used in designing prevention programs and future research with appropriate theoretical underpinning.
Authors: Sophie Grigoriadis; Emily H VonderPorten; Lana Mamisashvili; George Tomlinson; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Gideon Koren; Meir Steiner; Patricia Mousmanis; Amy Cheung; Kim Radford; Jovana Martinovic; Lori E Ross Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Olukunmi O Balogun; Elizabeth J O'Sullivan; Alison McFadden; Erika Ota; Anna Gavine; Christine D Garner; Mary J Renfrew; Stephen MacGillivray Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: R A Charlton; S Jordan; A Pierini; E Garne; A J Neville; A V Hansen; R Gini; D Thayer; K Tingay; A Puccini; H J Bos; A M Nybo Andersen; M Sinclair; H Dolk; L T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: BJOG Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Emma Molyneaux; Laurence A Telesia; Carol Henshaw; Elizabeth Boath; Eleanor Bradley; Louise M Howard Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-04-18
Authors: Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Jo Varley-Campbell; Sarah Stockton; Jennifer Francis; Clare Macdonald; Sunita Sharma; Peter Fleming; Elizabeth Punter; Charlotte Barry; Maija Kallioinen; Nina Khazaezadeh; David Jewell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.295