Literature DB >> 33407615

Amniotic fluid-derived multipotent stromal cells drive diabetic wound healing through modulation of macrophages.

Bibi S Subhan1, Jennifer Kwong1, Joseph F Kuhn1, Arie Monas1, Sonali Sharma1, Piul S Rabbani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous wounds in patients with diabetes exhibit impaired healing due to physiological impediments and conventional care options are severely limited. Multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) have been touted as a powerful new therapy for diabetic tissue repair owing to their trophic activity and low immunogenicity. However, variations in sources and access are limiting factors for broader adaptation and study of MSC-based therapies. Amniotic fluid presents a relatively unexplored source of MSCs and one with wide availability. Here, we investigate the potential of amniotic fluid-derived multipotent stromal cells (AFMSCs) to restore molecular integrity to diabetic wounds, amend pathology and promote wound healing.
METHOD: We obtained third trimester amniotic fluid from term cesarean delivery and isolated and expanded MSCs in vitro. We then generated 10 mm wounds in Leprdb/db diabetic mouse skin, and splinted them open to allow for humanized wound modeling. Immediately after wounding, we applied AFMSCs topically to the sites of injuries on diabetic mice, while media application only, defined as vehicle, served as controls. Post-treatment, we compared healing time and molecular and cellular events of AFMSC-treated, vehicle-treated, untreated diabetic, and non-diabetic wounds. A priori statistical analyses measures determined significance of the data. RESULT: Average time to wound closure was approximately 19 days in AFMSC-treated diabetic wounds. This was significantly lower than the vehicle-treated diabetic wounds, which required on average 27.5 days to heal (p < 0.01), and most similar to time of closure in wild type untreated wounds (an average of around 18 days). In addition, AFMSC treatment induced changes in the profiles of macrophage polarizing cytokines, resulting in a change in macrophage composition in the diabetic wound bed. We found no evidence of AFMSC engraftment or biotherapy induced immune response.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of diabetic wounds using amniotic fluid-derived MSCs encourages cutaneous tissue repair through affecting inflammatory cell behavior in the wound site. Since vehicle-treated diabetic wounds did not demonstrate accelerated healing, we determined that AFMSCs were therapeutic through their paracrine activities. Future studies should be aimed towards validating our observations through further examination of the paracrine potential of AFMSCs. In addition, investigations concerning safety and efficacy of this therapy in clinical trials should be pursued.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniotic fluid multipotent stromal cells; Cellular therapy; Diabetic wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407615      PMCID: PMC7789548          DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02674-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med        ISSN: 1479-5876            Impact factor:   5.531


  42 in total

1.  Characterization of human amniotic fluid stem cells and their pluripotential capability.

Authors:  Laura Perin; Sargis Sedrakyan; Stafano Da Sacco; Roger De Filippo
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 2.  Mesenchymal stem cells: Cell therapy and regeneration potential.

Authors:  Christina Brown; Christina McKee; Shreeya Bakshi; Keegan Walker; Eryk Hakman; Sophia Halassy; David Svinarich; Robert Dodds; Chhabi K Govind; G Rasul Chaudhry
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Effect of Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells on Kidney Function in a Model of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Sunil K George; Mehran Abolbashari; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Chao Zhang; Julie Allickson; John D Jackson; Sang Jin Lee; In Kap Ko; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Amniotic fluid as a source of multipotent cells for clinical use.

Authors:  Bruce K Young; Michael K Chan; Li Liu; Ross S Basch
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 5.  Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes.

Authors:  Harold Brem; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing.

Authors:  Robert D Galiano; Joseph Michaels; Michael Dobryansky; Jamie P Levine; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Secretory profiles and wound healing effects of human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Byung Sun Yoon; Jai-Hee Moon; Eun Kyoung Jun; Jonggun Kim; Isaac Maeng; Jun Sung Kim; Jung Han Lee; Cheong Soon Baik; Aeree Kim; Kyoung Shik Cho; Jang Ho Lee; Hwang Heui Lee; Kwang Youn Whang; Seungkwon You
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 8.  The Role of Macrophages in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing and Interventions to Promote Pro-wound Healing Phenotypes.

Authors:  Paulina Krzyszczyk; Rene Schloss; Andre Palmer; François Berthiaume
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Effect of amniotic fluid stem cells and amniotic fluid cells on the wound healing process in a white rat model.

Authors:  Jung Dug Yang; Dong Sik Choi; Young Kyoo Cho; Taek Kyun Kim; Jeong Woo Lee; Kang Young Choi; Ho Yun Chung; Byung Chae Cho; Jin Suk Byun
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

Review 10.  The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment.

Authors:  Fernando O Martinez; Siamon Gordon
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-03-03
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Behind the Scenes of Extracellular Vesicle Therapy for Skin Injuries and Disorders.

Authors:  Bibi S Subhan; Michelle Ki; Alexandra Verzella; Shruthi Shankar; Piul S Rabbani
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.947

2.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis and promote fat retention in fat grafting via polarized macrophages.

Authors:  Juanli Dang; Jizhong Yang; Zhou Yu; Lin Chen; Zhaoxiang Zhang; Kai Wang; Jiezhang Tang; Chenggang Yi
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.832

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.