Kui Muraya1, Michael Ogutu2, Mercy Mwadhi2, Jennifer Mikusa2, Maureen Okinyi2, Charity Magawi2, Scholastica Zakayo3, Rita Njeru3, Sarma Haribondhu4,5, Md Fakhar Uddin4, Vicki Marsh3,6, Judd L Walson7, James Berkley2,3,6, Sassy Molyneux3,6. 1. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. kmuraya@kemri-wellcome.org. 2. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. 3. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya. 4. Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. 5. Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia. 6. Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK. 7. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Rd NE, Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195-7965, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In many African settings, gender strongly influences household treatment-seeking and decision-making for childhood illnesses. While mothers are often the primary engagers with health facilities, their independence in illness-related decisions is shaped by various factors. Drawing on a gender lens, we explored treatment-seeking pathways pre- and post-hospital admission for acutely ill young children living in low income settlements in Nairobi, Kenya; and the gendered impact of child illness both at the household and health system level. METHODS: Household members of 22 children admitted to a public hospital were interviewed in their homes several times post hospital discharge. In-depth interviews covered the child's household situation, health and illness; and the family's treatment-seeking choices and experiences. Children were selected from an observational cohort established by the Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) Network. RESULTS: Treatment-seeking pathways were often long and complex, with mothers playing the key role in caring for their children and in treatment decision-making. Facing many anxieties and dilemmas, mothers often consulted with significant influencers - primarily women - particularly where illnesses were prolonged or complex. In contrast to observations in rural African contexts, fathers were less prominent as influencers than (often female) neighbours, grandparents and other relatives. Mothers were sometimes blamed for their child's condition at home and at health facilities. Children's illness episode and associated treatment-seeking had significant gendered socio-economic consequences for households, including through mothers having to take substantial time off work, reduce their working hours and income, or even losing their jobs. CONCLUSION: Women in urban low-income settings are disproportionately impacted by acute child illness and the related treatment-seeking and recovery process. The range of interventions needed to support mothers as they navigate their way through children's illnesses and recovery include: deliberate engagement of men in child health to counteract the dominant perception of child health and care as a 'female-domain'; targeted economic strategies such as cash transfers to safeguard the most vulnerable women and households, combined with more robust labour policies to protect affected women; as well as implementing strategies at the health system level to improve interactions between health workers and community members.
BACKGROUND: In many African settings, gender strongly influences household treatment-seeking and decision-making for childhood illnesses. While mothers are often the primary engagers with health facilities, their independence in illness-related decisions is shaped by various factors. Drawing on a gender lens, we explored treatment-seeking pathways pre- and post-hospital admission for acutely ill young children living in low income settlements in Nairobi, Kenya; and the gendered impact of child illness both at the household and health system level. METHODS: Household members of 22 children admitted to a public hospital were interviewed in their homes several times post hospital discharge. In-depth interviews covered the child's household situation, health and illness; and the family's treatment-seeking choices and experiences. Children were selected from an observational cohort established by the Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) Network. RESULTS: Treatment-seeking pathways were often long and complex, with mothers playing the key role in caring for their children and in treatment decision-making. Facing many anxieties and dilemmas, mothers often consulted with significant influencers - primarily women - particularly where illnesses were prolonged or complex. In contrast to observations in rural African contexts, fathers were less prominent as influencers than (often female) neighbours, grandparents and other relatives. Mothers were sometimes blamed for their child's condition at home and at health facilities. Children's illness episode and associated treatment-seeking had significant gendered socio-economic consequences for households, including through mothers having to take substantial time off work, reduce their working hours and income, or even losing their jobs. CONCLUSION:Women in urban low-income settings are disproportionately impacted by acute child illness and the related treatment-seeking and recovery process. The range of interventions needed to support mothers as they navigate their way through children's illnesses and recovery include: deliberate engagement of men in child health to counteract the dominant perception of child health and care as a 'female-domain'; targeted economic strategies such as cash transfers to safeguard the most vulnerable women and households, combined with more robust labour policies to protect affected women; as well as implementing strategies at the health system level to improve interactions between health workers and community members.
Authors: Robert E Black; Cesar G Victora; Susan P Walker; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Parul Christian; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Sally Grantham-McGregor; Joanne Katz; Reynaldo Martorell; Ricardo Uauy Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alex Ezeh; Oyinlola Oyebode; David Satterthwaite; Yen-Fu Chen; Robert Ndugwa; Jo Sartori; Blessing Mberu; G J Melendez-Torres; Tilahun Haregu; Samuel I Watson; Waleska Caiaffa; Anthony Capon; Richard J Lilford Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-10-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Victoria L Ewing; Rachel Tolhurst; Andrew Kapinda; Esther Richards; Dianne J Terlouw; David G Lalloo Journal: Malar J Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Fortunata Songora Makene; Richard Ngilangwa; Cristina Santos; Charlotte Cross; Twalib Ngoma; Phares G M Mujinja; Marc Wuyts; Maureen Mackintosh Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 2.655