Nobert Mudare1, Zvifadzo Matsena-Zingoni2, Aramu Makuwaza1, Edmore Mamini3, Shungu S Munyati3, Lovemore Gwanzura3,4, Nicholas Midzi2, Susan L Mutambu1, Peter Mason3, Tamaki Kobayashi5, Sungano Mharakurwa6,7. 1. Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe. 2. National Institute of Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe. 3. Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe. 4. University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences, Institute of Continuing Health Education, Harare, Zimbabwe. 5. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe. mharakurwas@africau.edu. 7. Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe. mharakurwas@africau.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the main techniques used to diagnose malaria. While microscopy is considered the gold standard, RDTs have established popularity as they allow for rapid diagnosis with minimal technical skills. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of two Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2)-based RDTs (Paracheck Pf® Test (Paracheck) and Malaria Pf™ ICT (ICT)) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a community survey. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2012 and December 2014 in Mutasa District, Manicaland Province, eastern Zimbabwe. Households were randomly selected using satellite imagery, and 224 households were visited. Residents present in the household on the date of the visit were recruited for the study. Participants of all age groups from the selected households were screened with Paracheck and ICT RDTs in parallel. Dried blood spots (DBS) and thin and thick smears were collected. Parasite DNA extracted from the DBS was subjected to nested PCR targeting the Plasmodium cytochrome b mitochondrial gene. Data analysis was performed using the Cohen's Kappa test to determine the interrater agreement and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test were reported. RESULTS: Results from a total of 702 participants were analysed. Most were females, 397 (57%), and the median age of participants was 21 years with an interquartile range of 9-39 years. Of those who were screened, 8 (1.1%), 35 (5.0%), and 21 (2.9%) were malaria parasite positive by microscopy, RDT and PCR, respectively. Paracheck and ICT RDTs had a 100% agreement. Comparing RDT and PCR results, 34 participants (4.8%) had discordant results. Most of the discordant cases were RDT positive but PCR negative (n = 24). Half of those RDT positive, but PCR negative individuals reported anti-malarials to use in the past month, which is significantly higher than reported anti-malarial drug use in the population (p < 0.001). The participant was febrile on the day of the visit, but relying on PfHRP2-based RDT would miss this case. Among the diagnostic methods evaluated, with reference to PCR, the sensitivity was higher with the RDT (52.4%) while specificity was higher with the microscopy (99.9%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was higher with the microscopy (87.5%), while the negative predictive values were similar for both microscopy and RDTs (98%). Overall, a strong correlated agreement with PCR was observed for the microscopy (97.9%) and the RDTs (95.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Paracheck and ICT RDTs showed 100% agreement and can be used interchangeably. As malaria transmission declines and Zimbabwe aims to reach malaria elimination, management of infected individuals with low parasitaemia as well as non-P. falciparum infection can be critical.
BACKGROUND: Microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the main techniques used to diagnose malaria. While microscopy is considered the gold standard, RDTs have established popularity as they allow for rapid diagnosis with minimal technical skills. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of two Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2)-based RDTs (Paracheck Pf® Test (Paracheck) and Malaria Pf™ ICT (ICT)) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a community survey. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2012 and December 2014 in Mutasa District, Manicaland Province, eastern Zimbabwe. Households were randomly selected using satellite imagery, and 224 households were visited. Residents present in the household on the date of the visit were recruited for the study. Participants of all age groups from the selected households were screened with Paracheck and ICT RDTs in parallel. Dried blood spots (DBS) and thin and thick smears were collected. Parasite DNA extracted from the DBS was subjected to nested PCR targeting the Plasmodium cytochrome b mitochondrial gene. Data analysis was performed using the Cohen's Kappa test to determine the interrater agreement and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test were reported. RESULTS: Results from a total of 702 participants were analysed. Most were females, 397 (57%), and the median age of participants was 21 years with an interquartile range of 9-39 years. Of those who were screened, 8 (1.1%), 35 (5.0%), and 21 (2.9%) were malaria parasite positive by microscopy, RDT and PCR, respectively. Paracheck and ICT RDTs had a 100% agreement. Comparing RDT and PCR results, 34 participants (4.8%) had discordant results. Most of the discordant cases were RDT positive but PCR negative (n = 24). Half of those RDT positive, but PCR negative individuals reported anti-malarials to use in the past month, which is significantly higher than reported anti-malarial drug use in the population (p < 0.001). The participant was febrile on the day of the visit, but relying on PfHRP2-based RDT would miss this case. Among the diagnostic methods evaluated, with reference to PCR, the sensitivity was higher with the RDT (52.4%) while specificity was higher with the microscopy (99.9%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was higher with the microscopy (87.5%), while the negative predictive values were similar for both microscopy and RDTs (98%). Overall, a strong correlated agreement with PCR was observed for the microscopy (97.9%) and the RDTs (95.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Paracheck and ICT RDTs showed 100% agreement and can be used interchangeably. As malaria transmission declines and Zimbabwe aims to reach malaria elimination, management of infected individuals with low parasitaemia as well as non-P. falciparum infection can be critical.
Authors: T Jelinek; S Proll; F Hess; G Kabagambe; F von Sonnenburg; T Loscher; A H Kilian Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: J M Rubio; A Benito; P J Berzosa; J Roche; S Puente; M Subirats; R López-Vélez; L García; J Alvar Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: B Singh; J Cox-Singh; A O Miller; M S Abdullah; G Snounou; H A Rahman Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1996 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Mufaro Kanyangarara; Edmore Mamini; Sungano Mharakurwa; Shungu Munyati; Lovemore Gwanzura; Tamaki Kobayashi; Timothy Shields; Luke C Mullany; Susan Mutambu; Peter R Mason; Frank C Curriero; William J Moss Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Tamaki Kobayashi; Dionicia Gamboa; Daouda Ndiaye; Liwang Cui; Patrick L Sutton; Joseph M Vinetz Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sungano Mharakurwa; Susan L Mutambu; Joseph Mberikunashe; Philip E Thuma; William J Moss; Peter R Mason Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Dianna E B Hergott; Tonny J Owalla; Jennifer E Balkus; Bernadette Apio; Jimmy Lema; Barbara Cemeri; Andrew Akileng; Annette M Seilie; Chris Chavtur; Weston Staubus; Ming Chang; Thomas G Egwang; Sean C Murphy Journal: Malar J Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 3.469