Literature DB >> 33407421

Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: a cross-sectional study.

Liyuan Cui1,2, Yaxin Zhu1, Jinglou Qu1,3, Liming Tie1,4, Ziqi Wang1, Bo Qu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critical thinking disposition helps medical students and professionals overcome the effects of personal values and beliefs when exercising clinical judgment. The lack of effective instruments to measure critical thinking disposition in medical students has become an obstacle for training and evaluating students in undergraduate programs in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CTDA test.
METHODS: A total of 278 students participated in this study and responded to the CTDA test. Cronbach's α coefficient, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor effects and ceiling effects were measured to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. Construct validity of the pre-specified three-domain structure of the CTDA was evaluated by explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity and discriminant validity were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was calculated to be 0.92, all of the domains showed acceptable internal consistency (0.81-0.86), and the test-retest reliability indicated acceptable intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.93, p < 0.01). The EFA and the CFA demonstrated that the three-domain model fitted the data adequately. The test showed satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The CTDA is a reliable and valid questionnaire to evaluate the disposition of medical students towards critical thinking in China and can reasonably be applied in critical thinking programs and medical education research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Critical thinking disposition; Critical thinking disposition assessment (CTDA); Medical students; Reliability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407421      PMCID: PMC7786903          DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Educ        ISSN: 1472-6920            Impact factor:   2.463


  27 in total

1.  Human error: models and management.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students.

Authors:  W Y Ip; D T Lee; I F Lee; J P Chau; Y S Wootton; A M Chang
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Global minimum essential requirements: a road towards competence-oriented medical education.

Authors:  M Roy Schwarz; Andrzej Wojtczak
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Validation of Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument.

Authors:  Hyunsook Shin; Chang Gi Park; Hyojin Kim
Journal:  Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci)       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.085

Review 6.  Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and clinical judgment.

Authors:  N C Facione; P A Facione
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  A semester-long critical thinking course in the first semester of pharmacy school: Impact on critical thinking skills.

Authors:  Lisa Smith; Chris Gillette; Shawn R Taylor; Michael Manolakis; Melissa Dinkins; Caleb Ramey
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2019-05-06

8.  Development and Psychometric Properties of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire.

Authors:  Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez; Anna Falcó-Pegueroles; Juan Roldán-Merino; Sandra Agustino-Rodriguez; Maria Del Carmen Gómez-Martín; Maria Teresa Lluch-Canut
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M).

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wang; Xiaoxiao Sun; Tianhao Huang; Renqiang He; Weina Hao; Li Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The dual effects of critical thinking disposition on worry.

Authors:  Yoshinori Sugiura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.