Teuni H Rooijackers1,2, G A Rixt Zijlstra3, Erik van Rossum3,4,5, Ruth G M Vogel3,4, Marja Y Veenstra6, Gertrudis I J M Kempen3,4, Silke F Metzelthin3,4. 1. Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. t.rooijackers@maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands. t.rooijackers@maastrichtuniversity.nl. 3. Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 5. Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Research Center for Community Care, Academy of Nursing, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 6. Burgerkracht Limburg, P.O. Box 5185, 6130 PD, Sittard, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many community-dwelling older adults experience limitations in (instrumental) activities of daily living, resulting in the need for homecare services. Whereas services should ideally aim at maintaining independence, homecare staff often take over activities, thereby undermining older adults' self-care skills and jeopardizing their ability to continue living at home. Reablement is an innovative care approach aimed at optimizing independence. The reablement training program 'Stay Active at Home' for homecare staff was designed to support the implementation of reablement in the delivery of homecare services. This study evaluated the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context of the program. METHODS: We conducted a process evaluation alongside a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial, using an embedded mixed-methods design. One hundred fifty-four homecare staff members (23 nurses, 34 nurse assistants, 8 nurse aides and 89 domestic workers) from five working areas received the program. Data on the implementation (reach, dose, fidelity, adaptations and acceptability), possible mechanisms of impact (homecare staff's knowledge, attitude, skills and support) and context were collected using logbooks, registration forms, checklists, log data and focus group interviews with homecare staff (n = 23) and program trainers (n = 4). RESULTS: The program was largely implemented as intended. Homecare staff's average compliance to the program meetings was 73.4%; staff members accepted the program, and particularly valued its practical elements and team approach. They experienced positive changes in their knowledge, attitude and skills about reablement, and perceived social and organizational support from colleagues and team managers to implement reablement. However, the extent to which homecare staff implemented reablement in practice, varied. Perceived facilitators included digital care plans, the organization's lump sum funding and newly referred clients. Perceived barriers included resistance to change from clients or their social network, complex care situations, time pressure and staff shortages. CONCLUSIONS: The program was feasible to implement in the Dutch homecare setting, and was perceived as useful in daily practice. Nevertheless, integrating reablement into homecare staff's working practices remained challenging due to various personal and contextual factors. Future implementation of the program may benefit from minor program adaptations and a more stimulating work environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03293303 ). Registered 26 September 2017.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many community-dwelling older adults experience limitations in (instrumental) activities of daily living, resulting in the need for homecare services. Whereas services should ideally aim at maintaining independence, homecare staff often take over activities, thereby undermining older adults' self-care skills and jeopardizing their ability to continue living at home. Reablement is an innovative care approach aimed at optimizing independence. The reablement training program 'Stay Active at Home' for homecare staff was designed to support the implementation of reablement in the delivery of homecare services. This study evaluated the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context of the program. METHODS: We conducted a process evaluation alongside a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial, using an embedded mixed-methods design. One hundred fifty-four homecare staff members (23 nurses, 34 nurse assistants, 8 nurse aides and 89 domestic workers) from five working areas received the program. Data on the implementation (reach, dose, fidelity, adaptations and acceptability), possible mechanisms of impact (homecare staff's knowledge, attitude, skills and support) and context were collected using logbooks, registration forms, checklists, log data and focus group interviews with homecare staff (n = 23) and program trainers (n = 4). RESULTS: The program was largely implemented as intended. Homecare staff's average compliance to the program meetings was 73.4%; staff members accepted the program, and particularly valued its practical elements and team approach. They experienced positive changes in their knowledge, attitude and skills about reablement, and perceived social and organizational support from colleagues and team managers to implement reablement. However, the extent to which homecare staff implemented reablement in practice, varied. Perceived facilitators included digital care plans, the organization's lump sum funding and newly referred clients. Perceived barriers included resistance to change from clients or their social network, complex care situations, time pressure and staff shortages. CONCLUSIONS: The program was feasible to implement in the Dutch homecare setting, and was perceived as useful in daily practice. Nevertheless, integrating reablement into homecare staff's working practices remained challenging due to various personal and contextual factors. Future implementation of the program may benefit from minor program adaptations and a more stimulating work environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03293303 ). Registered 26 September 2017.
Entities:
Keywords:
Activities of daily living; Behavior and behavior mechanisms; Home and community based care and services; Independence; Process evaluation; Reablement; Self-care; Training program
Authors: Tanja A C Dorresteijn; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Jolanda C M Van Haastregt; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Gertrudis I J M Kempen Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Lawrence A Palinkas; Sarah M Horwitz; Carla A Green; Jennifer P Wisdom; Naihua Duan; Kimberly Hoagwood Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-09
Authors: John R Beard; Alana Officer; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Ritu Sadana; Anne Margriet Pot; Jean-Pierre Michel; Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; JoAnne E Epping-Jordan; G M E E Geeske Peeters; Wahyu Retno Mahanani; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Somnath Chatterji Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Silke F Metzelthin; Gertrud Ar Zijlstra; Erik van Rossum; Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel; Barbara Resnick; Gill Lewin; Matthew Parsons; Gertrudis Ijm Kempen Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Rowan G M Smeets; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Erik van Rossum; Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel; Whitney A G Hanssen; Silke F Metzelthin Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2019-10-06
Authors: Teuni H Rooijackers; Silke F Metzelthin; Erik van Rossum; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Silvia M A A Evers; Andrea Gabrio; G A Rixt Zijlstra Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.458