Priscilla C Barger1,2, Mark R Liles3, Benjamin H Beck4, Joseph C Newton5. 1. Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. bargepc@auburn.edu. 2. Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Math, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. bargepc@auburn.edu. 3. Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Math, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. 4. USDA ARS Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, Auburn, AL, USA. 5. Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. newtojc@auburn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila (vAh) is an emerging pathogen in freshwater aquaculture that results in the loss of over 3 million pounds of marketable channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, and channel catfish hybrids (I. punctatus, ♀ x blue catfish, I. furcatus, ♂) each year from freshwater catfish production systems in Alabama, U.S.A. vAh isolates are clonal in nature and are genetically unique from, and significantly more virulent than, traditional A. hydrophila isolates from fish. Even with the increased virulence, natural infections cannot be reproduced in aquaria challenges making it difficult to determine modes of infection and the pathophysiology behind the devastating mortalities that are commonly observed. Despite the intimate connection between environmental adaptation and plastic response, the role of environmental adaption on vAh pathogenicity and virulence has not been previously explored. In this study, secreted proteins of vAh cultured as free-living planktonic cells and within a biofilm were compared to elucidate the role of biofilm growth on virulence. RESULTS: Functional proteolytic assays found significantly increased degradative activity in biofilm secretomes; in contrast, planktonic secretomes had significantly increased hemolytic activity, suggesting higher toxigenic potential. Intramuscular injection challenges in a channel catfish model showed that in vitro degradative activity translated into in vivo tissue destruction. Identification of secreted proteins by HPLC-MS/MS revealed the presence of many putative virulence proteins under both growth conditions. Biofilm grown vAh produced higher levels of proteolytic enzymes and adhesins, whereas planktonically grown cells secreted higher levels of toxins, porins, and fimbrial proteins. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first comparison of the secreted proteomes of vAh when grown in two distinct ecological niches. These data on the adaptive physiological response of vAh based on growth condition increase our understanding of how environmental niche partitioning could affect vAh pathogenicity and virulence. Increased secretion of colonization factors and degradative enzymes during biofilm growth and residency may increase bacterial attachment and host invasiveness, while increased secretion of hemolysins, porins, and other potential toxins under planktonic growth (or after host invasion) could result in increased host mortality. The results of this research underscore the need to use culture methods that more closely mimic natural ecological habitat growth to improve our understanding of vAh pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila (vAh) is an emerging pathogen in freshwater aquaculture that results in the loss of over 3 million pounds of marketable channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, and channel catfish hybrids (I. punctatus, ♀ x blue catfish, I. furcatus, ♂) each year from freshwater catfish production systems in Alabama, U.S.A. vAh isolates are clonal in nature and are genetically unique from, and significantly more virulent than, traditional A. hydrophila isolates from fish. Even with the increased virulence, natural infections cannot be reproduced in aquaria challenges making it difficult to determine modes of infection and the pathophysiology behind the devastating mortalities that are commonly observed. Despite the intimate connection between environmental adaptation and plastic response, the role of environmental adaption on vAh pathogenicity and virulence has not been previously explored. In this study, secreted proteins of vAh cultured as free-living planktonic cells and within a biofilm were compared to elucidate the role of biofilm growth on virulence. RESULTS: Functional proteolytic assays found significantly increased degradative activity in biofilm secretomes; in contrast, planktonic secretomes had significantly increased hemolytic activity, suggesting higher toxigenic potential. Intramuscular injection challenges in a channel catfish model showed that in vitro degradative activity translated into in vivo tissue destruction. Identification of secreted proteins by HPLC-MS/MS revealed the presence of many putative virulence proteins under both growth conditions. Biofilm grown vAh produced higher levels of proteolytic enzymes and adhesins, whereas planktonically grown cells secreted higher levels of toxins, porins, and fimbrial proteins. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first comparison of the secreted proteomes of vAh when grown in two distinct ecological niches. These data on the adaptive physiological response of vAh based on growth condition increase our understanding of how environmental niche partitioning could affect vAh pathogenicity and virulence. Increased secretion of colonization factors and degradative enzymes during biofilm growth and residency may increase bacterial attachment and host invasiveness, while increased secretion of hemolysins, porins, and other potential toxins under planktonic growth (or after host invasion) could result in increased host mortality. The results of this research underscore the need to use culture methods that more closely mimic natural ecological habitat growth to improve our understanding of vAh pathogenesis.
Authors: Christopher J Grim; Elena V Kozlova; Duraisamy Ponnusamy; Eric C Fitts; Jian Sha; Michelle L Kirtley; Christina J van Lier; Bethany L Tiner; Tatiana E Erova; Sandeep J Joseph; Timothy D Read; Joshua R Shak; Sam W Joseph; Ed Singletary; Tracy Felland; Wallace B Baze; Amy J Horneman; Ashok K Chopra Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Rekha Seshadri; Sam W Joseph; Ashok K Chopra; Jian Sha; Jonathan Shaw; Joerg Graf; Daniel Haft; Martin Wu; Qinghu Ren; M J Rosovitz; Ramana Madupu; Luke Tallon; Mary Kim; Shaohua Jin; Hue Vuong; O Colin Stine; Afsar Ali; Amy J Horneman; John F Heidelberg Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Julia W Pridgeon; Phillip H Klesius; Lin Song; Dunhua Zhang; Kyoko Kojima; James A Mobley Journal: Vet Microbiol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Mohammad J Hossain; Geoffrey C Waldbieser; Dawei Sun; Nancy K Capps; William B Hemstreet; Kristen Carlisle; Matt J Griffin; Lester Khoo; Andrew E Goodwin; Tad S Sonstegard; Steven Schroeder; Karl Hayden; Joseph C Newton; Jeffery S Terhune; Mark R Liles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mohammad J Hossain; Dawei Sun; Donald J McGarey; Shannon Wrenn; Laura M Alexander; Maria Elena Martino; Ye Xing; Jeffery S Terhune; Mark R Liles Journal: MBio Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Nicolas Jaccard; Lewis D Griffin; Ana Keser; Rhys J Macown; Alexandre Super; Farlan S Veraitch; Nicolas Szita Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Rafael Bastos Gonçalves Pessoa; Weslley Felix de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Dos Santos Correia; Adriana Fontes; Luana Cassandra Breitenbach Barroso Coelho Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.064