Literature DB >> 33407039

A call for change from impersonal risk assessment to a relational approach: professionals' reflections on the national guidelines for suicide prevention in mental health care in Norway.

Kristin Espeland1, Heidi Hjelmeland1, Birthe Loa Knizek1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to explore how professionals working with suicide prevention experience the influence of the national guidelines on mental healthcare, and to gather recommendations for which steps to take next.
METHODS: This is a qualitative study with an explorative design. We interviewed 22 professionals responsible for implementing suicide prevention action plans and guidelines, and/or conducting relevant research. We analysed the data by means of thematic analysis.
RESULTS: We found that the participants had an ambivalent view on risk assessment-it may be a tool, but it may also compromise other important aspects in prevention. Moreover, the possibility of liability has resulted in the need for self-protection. Instead, the participants recommended a relational approach to suicide prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that the emphasis on standardized suicide risk assessment has negatively influenced suicide prevention in mental healthcare, and an approach emphasizing relational aspects is recommended. However, the prevailing objectifying concept of knowledge, the epistemological debate and the emergence of the New Public Management ideology may obstruct a fundamental emphasis on relationships. A paradigm shift in mental healthcare is called for with respect to the concept of knowledge, which forms our understandings and practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Suicide prevention; mental healthcare; qualitative research; relational approach; risk assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407039      PMCID: PMC7801051          DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1868737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being        ISSN: 1748-2623


  27 in total

1.  Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance-outcome relationship: a restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis.

Authors:  A C Del Re; Christoph Flückiger; Adam O Horvath; Dianne Symonds; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-21

2.  Suicide risk assessment among psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-risk categories.

Authors:  M Large; N Myles; H Myles; A Corderoy; M Weiser; M Davidson; C J Ryan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Why Suicide Risk Assessment Still Matters.

Authors:  Hal S Wortzel; Sarra Nazem; Nazanin H Bahraini; Bridget B Matarazzo
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.325

4.  Health services, suicide, and self-harm: patient distress and system anxiety.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Joe Bouch; Simon Bradstreet; Trevor Lakey; Anne Nightingale; Rory C O'Connor
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical factors associated with the suicide of psychiatric in-patients.

Authors:  M Large; G Smith; S Sharma; O Nielssen; S P Singh
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Caring for Suicidal Patients in Psychiatric Wards: An Emotional Endeavor.

Authors:  Julia Hagen; Birthe Loa Knizek; Heidi Hjelmeland
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.218

7.  Struggling to become ready for consolation: experiences of suicidal patients.

Authors:  Anne-Grethe Talseth; Fredricka Gilje; Astrid Norberg
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 8.  Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales.

Authors:  Melissa K Y Chan; Henna Bhatti; Nick Meader; Sarah Stockton; Jonathan Evans; Rory C O'Connor; Nav Kapur; Tim Kendall
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Prediction of suicide in psychiatric patients. Report of a prospective study.

Authors:  A D Pokorny
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1983-03

10.  Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance.

Authors:  Scott A Baldwin; Bruce E Wampold; Zac E Imel
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Suicide Models and Treatment Models Are Separate Entities. What Does It Mean for Clinical Suicide Prevention?

Authors:  Konrad Michel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.