Literature DB >> 33406642

Evaluation of Chromosomal Structural Anomalies in Fertility Disorders.

Danielius Serapinas1,2, Emilija Valantinavičienė1, Eglė Machtejevienė3, Agnė Bartkevičiūtė4, Daiva Bartkevičienė5.   

Abstract

Background and objectives: Reproductive disorders may occur not only due to environmental factors (air pollution, stressful lifestyle, previous abortions or the use of contraceptives) but also due to genetic factors. Materials and
Methods: The aim of the study was to identify the range and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in couples (n = 99) with infertility or recurrent miscarriages in Lithuania. The data were collected from the out-patient medical histories. The couples were divided into three groups based on pregnancy, childbirth and the number of miscarriages. The Chi-square test was used to carry out the statistical analysis, and the statistical significance was (p < 0.05).
Results: There were 6.6% (n = 13) structural changes observed in the karyotype tests. Chromosomal aberrations were found in 3% (n = 6) of the subjects, while 3.6% (n = 7) of them had chromosomal length polymorphisms. No difference was found between the aberration frequency in the karyotypes of men and women (p > 0.05). The most common aberrations were balanced translocations (23.1%, n = 3) which accounted for 15.4% of the reciprocal (n = 2) and 7.7% of the Robertsonian type (n = 1) of translocations. The most frequent aberrations were found in couples with the inability to conceive (42.9% (n = 3), p = 0.031). The childless couples and those with recurrent miscarriages showed an aberration rate of 8.2% (n = 5), while in the couples with at least one child it was 16.1% (n = 5). The group of couples unable to conceive had a significantly higher aberration rate of 28.6% (n = 2), p = 0.029. Miscarriages in partners' families accounted for 8.1%. Miscarriages on the female side of the family accounted for 4.5% (n = 9), on the male side it accounted for 2.5% (n = 5) and on both sides it accounted for 1.1% (n = 2). There were no statistically significant differences observed between the female and male sides (p > 0.05). The miscarriages observed in the second group of couples (childless with ≥2 miscarriages) were more frequent at 18.1% (n = 11), in the third group (having children ≥2 miscarriages) they were less frequent at 12.9% (n = 4), while no miscarriages were recorded in the first group of infertile couples. In total, 3% of the identified significant chromosomal aberrations were likely to trigger miscarriages or the inability to conceive. Conclusions: In couples with reproductive disorders, chromosomal mutations and chromosomal length polymorphisms were found at similar rates: 3% vs. 3.6%. The highest aberration rate was found in couples that were unable to conceive, a lower one was found in a group with children and ≥2 miscarriages, and the lowest one was found in a childless group of subjects with ≥2 miscarriages. The miscarriage rate in partner families was 8.1%; however, no difference was found between the male and female sides.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal mutations; genetic counselling; infertility

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406642      PMCID: PMC7824539          DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  27 in total

Review 1.  Genetic aspects of miscarriage.

Authors:  M Goddijn; N J Leschot
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-10

2.  Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood.

Authors:  P S MOORHEAD; P C NOWELL; W J MELLMAN; D M BATTIPS; D A HUNGERFORD
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Positive reproductive family history for spontaneous abortion: predictor for recurrent miscarriage in young couples.

Authors:  Silvana Miskovic; Vida Culic; Pasko Konjevoda; Jasminka Pavelic
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 4.  Infertility and miscarriage: common pathways in manifestation and management.

Authors:  Angena Agenor; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-04

5.  Investigation of recurrent miscarriages.

Authors:  Fred Kavalier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-16

6.  A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

Authors:  M Seabright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Recurrent pregnancy losses and parental chromosome abnormalities: a review.

Authors:  A T Tharapel; S A Tharapel; R M Bannerman
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-09

8.  Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study.

Authors:  Maureen T M Franssen; Johanna C Korevaar; Fulco van der Veen; Nico J Leschot; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Mariette Goddijn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-22

9.  Low uptake of prenatal diagnosis after established carrier status of a balanced structural chromosome abnormality in couples with recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Fleur Vansenne; Corianne A J M de Borgie; Johanna C Korevaar; Maureen T M Franssen; Eva Pajkrt; Kerstin B M Hansson; Nico J Leschot; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Fulco van der Veen; Mariëtte Goddijn
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Chromosomal analysis of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions in northeastern iran.

Authors:  Saeedeh Ghazaey; Fatemeh Keify; Farzaneh Mirzaei; Masumeh Maleki; Semiramis Tootian; Mitra Ahadian; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.