Sherif A El-Kafrawy1,2, Mai M El-Daly1,2, Ahmed M Hassan1, Reham M Kaki3, Adel M Abuzenadah1,2,4, Mohammad A Kamal4,5, Esam I Azhar1,2. 1. Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease and Department of Infection Control and Environmental Health King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. 4. King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80216, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. 5. Enzymoics, 7 Peterlee Place, Novel Global Community Educational Foundation, Hebersham, NSW 2770, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic of acute respiratory disease (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-strand RNA virus and its genomic characterization has played a vital role in the design of appropriate diagnostics tests. The current RT-PCR protocol for SARS-CoV-2 detects two regions of the viral genome, requiring RNA extraction and several hours. There is a need for fast, simple, and cost-effective detection strategies. METHODS: we optimized a protocol for direct RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without the need for nucleic acid extraction. Nasopharyngeal samples were diluted to 1:3 using diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. The diluted samples were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min in a thermal cycler, followed by a cooling step at 4 °C for 5 min. Samples then underwent reverse transcription real-time RT-PCR in the E and RdRp genes. RESULTS: our direct detection protocol showed 100% concordance with the standard protocol with an average Ct value difference of 4.38 for the E region and 3.85 for the RdRp region. CONCLUSION: the direct PCR technique was found to be a reliable and sensitive method that can be used to reduce the time and cost of the assay by removing the need for RNA extraction. It enables the use of the assay in research, diagnostics, and screening for COVID-19 in regions with fewer economic resources, where supplies are more limited allowing for wider use for screening.
INTRODUCTION: theemergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic of acute respiratory disease (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-strand RNA virus and its genomic characterization has played a vital role in the design of appropriate diagnostics tests. The current RT-PCR protocol for SARS-CoV-2 detects two regions of the viral genome, requiring RNA extraction and several hours. There is a need for fast, simple, and cost-effective detection strategies. METHODS: we optimized a protocol for direct RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without theneed for nucleic acid extraction. Nasopharyngeal samples were diluted to 1:3 using diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. The diluted samples were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min in a thermal cycler, followed by a cooling step at 4 °C for 5 min. Samples then underwent reverse transcription real-time RT-PCR in theE and RdRp genes. RESULTS: our direct detection protocol showed 100% concordance with the standard protocol with an average Ct value difference of 4.38 for theE region and 3.85 for theRdRp region. CONCLUSION: the direct PCR technique was found to be a reliable and sensitivemethod that can be used to reduce the time and cost of the assay by removing theneed for RNA extraction. It enables the use of the assay in research, diagnostics, and screening for COVID-19 in regions with fewer economic resources, where supplies aremore limited allowing for wider use for screening.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; direct RT-PCR; molecular detection
Authors: Sasan R Fereidouni; Elke Starick; Mario Ziller; Timm C Harder; Hermann Unger; Keith Hamilton; Anja Globig Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Ninad Mehta; Bastien Perrais; Kimberly Martin; Anil Kumar; Tom C Hobman; Mary Noreen Cabalfin-Chua; Manuel Emerson Donaldo; Maria Salome Siose Painaga; James Yared Gaite; Vanessa Tran; Kevin C Kain; Michael T Hawkes; Stephanie K Yanow Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Julia Alcoba-Florez; Rafaela González-Montelongo; Antonio Íñigo-Campos; Diego García-Martínez de Artola; Helena Gil-Campesino; Laura Ciuffreda; Agustín Valenzuela-Fernández; Carlos Flores Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Manohar B Mutnal; Alejandro C Arroliga; Kimberly Walker; Amin Mohammad; Matthew M Brigmon; Ryan M Beaver; John K Midturi; Arundhati Rao Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: Emily A Bruce; Meei-Li Huang; Garrett A Perchetti; Scott Tighe; Pheobe Laaguiby; Jessica J Hoffman; Diana L Gerrard; Arun K Nalla; Yulun Wei; Alexander L Greninger; Sean A Diehl; David J Shirley; Debra G B Leonard; Christopher D Huston; Beth D Kirkpatrick; Julie A Dragon; Jessica W Crothers; Keith R Jerome; Jason W Botten Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Sherif A El-Kafrawy; Mai M El-Daly; Ahmed M Hassan; Steve M Harakeh; Thamir A Alandijany; Esam I Azhar Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-28
Authors: Waleed H Albuali; Amal A AlGhamdi; Shaikha J Aldossary; Saleh A AlHarbi; Sami I Al Majed; Ahmed Alenizi; Mohammad H Al-Qahtani; Amer A Lardhi; Shams A Al-Turki; Abdulaziz S AlSanea; Dalal K Bubshait; Sumayyah A Kobeisy; Noor H Herzallah; Wejdan A Alqarni; Abeer H AlHarbi; Hamad W Albuali; Bader J Aldossary; Faisal O AlQurashi; Abdullah A Yousef Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 2.692