Literature DB >> 33406478

YouTube Videos Demonstrating the Nasopharyngeal Swab Technique for SARS-CoV-2 Specimen Collection: Content Analysis.

Kyohei Itamura1, Arthur Wu1,2, Elisa Illing2, Jonathan Ting2, Thomas Higgins3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction using nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the most widely used diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, false negatives and the sensitivity of this mode of testing have posed challenges in the accurate estimation of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether technical and, therefore, correctable errors were being made with regard to nasopharyngeal swab procedures.
METHODS: We searched a web-based video database (YouTube) for videos demonstrating SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab tests, posted from January 1 to May 15, 2020. Videos were rated by 3 blinded rhinologists for accuracy of swab angle and depth. The overall score for swab angle and swab depth for each nasopharyngeal swab demonstration video was determined based on the majority score with agreement between at least 2 of the 3 reviewers. We then comparatively evaluated video data collected from YouTube videos demonstrating the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique with data from videos demonstrating an incorrect nasopharyngeal swab technique. Multiple linear regression analysis with statistical significance set at P=.05 was performed to determine video data variables associated with the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique.
RESULTS: In all, 126 videos met the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 52.3% (66/126) of all videos demonstrated the correct swab angle, and 46% (58/126) of the videos demonstrated an appropriate swab depth. Moreover, 45.2% (57/126) of the videos demonstrated both correct nasopharyngeal swab angle and appropriate depth, whereas 46.8% (59/126) of the videos demonstrated both incorrect nasopharyngeal swab angle and inappropriate depth. Videos with correct nasopharyngeal swab technique were associated with the swab operators identifying themselves as a medical professional or as an Ear, Nose, Throat-related medical professional. We also found an association between correct nasopharyngeal swab techniques and recency of video publication date (relative to May 15, 2020).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that over half of the videos documenting the nasopharyngeal swab test showed an incorrect technique, which could elevate false-negative test rates. Therefore, greater attention needs to be provided toward educating frontline health care workers who routinely perform nasopharyngeal swab procedures. ©Kyohei Itamura, Arthur Wu, Elisa Illing, Jonathan Ting, Thomas Higgins. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 14.01.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; PCR; SARS-coV-2; YouTube; content analysis; coronavirus; diagnostic; digital epidemiology; error; infodemiology; nasopharyngeal swab; testing; video; viral testing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406478     DOI: 10.2196/24220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill        ISSN: 2369-2960


  6 in total

1.  An analysis of the dynamic spatial spread of COVID-19 across South Korea.

Authors:  Dayun Kang; Jungsoon Choi; Yeonju Kim; Donghyok Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Correctly performed nasal swabs.

Authors:  Konstantin Zedtwitz-Liebenstein
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Complications Associated With Nasopharyngeal COVID-19 Testing: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database and Literature Review.

Authors:  Amir A Hakimi; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 4.  The role of educating health-care personnel in prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19: A narrative mini review.

Authors:  Parinaz Tabari; Mitra Amini; Neil Arya; Mohsen Moghadami; Kaveh Khoshnood; Mansoureh Shokripour; Navid Omidifar
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Proposal of a population wide genome-based testing for Covid-19.

Authors:  Hans Lehrach; Jon Curtis; Bodo Lange; Lesley A Ogilvie; Richard Gauss; Christoph Steininger; Erhard Scholz; Matthias Kreck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Modeling Global COVID-19 Dissemination Data After the Emergence of Omicron Variant Using Multipronged Approaches.

Authors:  Subhash Kumar Yadav; Vinit Kumar; Yusuf Akhter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.343

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.