Literature DB >> 33406327

Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden.

Jonas F Ludvigsson1, Lars Engerström2, Charlotta Nordenhäll3, Emma Larsson4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406327      PMCID: PMC7821981          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2026670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: In mid-March 2020, many countries decided to close schools in an attempt to limit the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).[1,2] Sweden was one of the few countries that decided to keep preschools (generally caring for children 1 to 6 years of age) and schools (with children 7 to 16 years of age) open. Here, we present data from Sweden on Covid-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers. In Sweden, Covid-19 was prevalent in the community during the spring of 2020.[3] Social distancing was encouraged in Sweden, but wearing face masks was not.[3] Data on severe Covid-19, as defined by intensive care unit (ICU) admission, were prospectively recorded in the nationwide Swedish intensive care registry. We followed all children who were admitted to an ICU between March 1 and June 30, 2020 (school ended around June 10) with laboratory-verified or clinically verified Covid-19, including patients who were admitted for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C, which is likely to be related to Covid-19)[4] according to the Swedish Pediatric Rheumatology Quality Register. (More information on the registry and a link to the Word Health Organization scientific brief on MIS-C are provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.) The Stockholm Ethics Review Board approved the study. Informed consent was waived by the review board. The number of deaths from any cause among the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2019) who were 1 to 16 years of age was 65 during the pre–Covid-19 period of November 2019 through February 2020 and 69 during 4 months of exposure to Covid-19 (March through June 2020) (see the Supplementary Appendix). From March through June 2020, a total of 15 children with Covid-19 (including those with MIS-C) were admitted to an ICU (0.77 per 100,000 children in this age group) (Table 1), 4 of whom were 1 to 6 years of age (0.54 per 100,000) and 11 of whom were 7 to 16 years of age (0.90 per 100,000). Four of the children had an underlying chronic coexisting condition (cancer in 2, chronic kidney disease in 1, and hematologic disease in 1). No child with Covid-19 died.
Table 1

Characteristics of the Children with Covid-19, Including Those with MIS-C, Admitted to Swedish ICUs in March–June 2020.*

AgeSexSARS-CoV-2 Test ResultDays in ICUNo. of AdmissionsBP and Laboratory Measures at AdmissionOrgan SupportComplications
PCRAntibodies
1 yr§FNegativePositive51Systolic BP, 70 mm Hg; SaO2, 99%; BE, +0.6 mmol/liter; lactate, 1.6 mmol/literMIS-C, septic shock, renal failure
3 yrFPositiveND383Systolic BP, 75 to 143 mm Hg; SaO2, 96%; lactate, 1.2 mmol/literInvasive mechanical ventilationClostridium difficile infection
4 yrFPositivePositive61Systolic BP, 87 mm Hg; SaO2, 99%MIS-C, renal failure, coagulation disorder
5 yrFPositivePositive31Systolic BP, 83 mm Hg; SaO2, 98%; BE, −0.7 mmol/literMIS-C
7 yrMNegativeND<11Systolic BP, 85 mm Hg, SaO2, 97%; BE, −0.7 mmol/literIron deficiency, coma, fever
7 yrFPositivePositive352Systolic BP, 115 mm Hg; SaO2, 90%; lactate, 0.8; BE, +5 mmol/literInvasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy
10 yr§FNegativePositive11Systolic BP, 95 mm Hg; SaO2, 99%; lactate, 1.1 mmol/liter; BE, −1.5 mmol/literMIS-C, cardiomyopathy
12 yrMPositiveND<11Systolic BP, 100 mm Hg; SaO2, 98%; BE, −6 mmol/liter
12 yrMPositiveND21Viral pneumonia
13 yrMPositiveND112Systolic BP, 123 to 137 mm Hg; SaO2, 92%; lactate, 0.9 mmol/liter; BE, +3.2 mmol/liter
13 yrFPositivePositive72Systolic BP, 80 mm Hg; SaO2, 98%; lactate, 3.7 mmol/liter; BE, −9 mmol/literInvasive mechanical ventilationMIS-C, heart failure
14 yr§MNegativePositive41Systolic BP, 57 mm Hg; SaO2, 98%; lactate, 3.4 mmol/liter; BE, −1.5 mmol/literMIS-C, myocarditis, sepsis
14 yrMPositiveND42Systolic BP, 90 to 100 mm Hg; SaO2, 83%; lactate, 2.7 mmol/liter; BE, +4 mmol/literInvasive mechanical ventilation
16 yrMPositivePositive91
16 yrMNegativePositive51MIS-C, myocarditis with heart failure

Four children had underlying conditions: 2 had cancer, 1 had chronic kidney disease, and 1 had hematologic disease and had undergone stem-cell transplantation. Two children had additional conditions: 1 had alcohol intoxication, and 1 had sustained a traumatic injury; coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) was diagnosed in these 2 children only when they underwent screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the intensive care unit (ICU) (they did not have Covid-19 symptoms). BE denotes base excess, BP blood pressure, MIS-C multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, ND not done, PCR polymerase chain reaction, and SaO2 oxygen saturation.

For patients with multiple admissions, the total duration is reported.

For patients with multiple admissions, the most aberrant value is reported.

The patient was identified through the presence of MIS-C according to the Swedish Pediatric Rheumatology Quality Register. Covid-19 was not diagnosed during ICU care, but the results of subsequent antibody testing were positive.

Covid-19 was diagnosed clinically (i.e., SARS-CoV-2 was not detected during the ICU admission).

Data from the Public Health Agency of Sweden (published report[5] and personal communication) showed that fewer than 10 preschool teachers and 20 schoolteachers in Sweden received intensive care for Covid-19 up until June 30, 2020 (20 per 103,596 schoolteachers, which is equal to 19 per 100,000). As compared with other occupations (excluding health care workers), this corresponded to sex- and age-adjusted relative risks of 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.49) among preschool teachers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.68) among schoolteachers (see the Supplementary Appendix). The present study had some limitations. We lacked data on household transmission of Covid-19 from schoolchildren, and the 95% confidence intervals for our results are wide. Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Among the 1.95 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.
  24 in total

1.  Impact of Using Facemasks on Literacy Learning: The Perception of Early Childhood Education Teachers.

Authors:  Diego Vergara; Álvaro Antón-Sancho; Juan-José Maldonado; María Nieto-Sobrino
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  The new normal: Covid-19 risk perceptions and support for continuing restrictions past vaccinations.

Authors:  Maja Graso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  The Science Behind Safe School Re-opening: Leveraging the Pillars of Infection Control to Support Safe Elementary and Secondary Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Elissa M Schechter-Perkins; Polly van den Berg; Westyn Branch-Elliman
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 4.  COVID-19: breaking down a global health crisis.

Authors:  Saad I Mallah; Omar K Ghorab; Sabrina Al-Salmi; Omar S Abdellatif; Tharmegan Tharmaratnam; Mina Amin Iskandar; Jessica Atef Nassef Sefen; Pardeep Sidhu; Bassam Atallah; Rania El-Lababidi; Manaf Al-Qahtani
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Restrictive Measures for Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are They Scientifically Supported?

Authors:  Nicola Principi; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Schools do not need to close to reduce COVID-19 but other measures are advisable.

Authors:  Inge Axelsson
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling.

Authors:  Justin Lessler; M Kate Grabowski; Kyra H Grantz; Elena Badillo-Goicoechea; C Jessica E Metcalf; Carly Lupton-Smith; Andrew S Azman; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 63.714

8.  Lessons learnt during the COVID-19 pandemic: Why Australian schools should be prioritised to stay open.

Authors:  Archana Koirala; Sharon Goldfeld; Asha C Bowen; Catherine Choong; Kathleen Ryan; Nicholas Wood; Noni Winkler; Margie Danchin; Kristine Macartney; Fiona M Russell
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 1.929

9.  Face Masks in Young Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Parents' and Pediatricians' Point of View.

Authors:  Rémy Assathiany; Catherine Salinier; Stéphane Béchet; Claire Dolard; Fabienne Kochert; Alain Bocquet; Corinne Levy
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Closing schools for SARS-CoV-2: a pragmatic rapid recommendation.

Authors:  Geertruida Bekkering; Nicolas Delvaux; Patrik Vankrunkelsven; Jaan Toelen; Sigrid Aertgeerts; Sofie Crommen; Pedro De Bruyckere; Ignaas Devisch; Tinne Lernout; Katrien Masschalck; Nore Milissen; Geert Molenberghs; Annelies Pascal; Oscar Plomteux; Marc Raes; Lise Rans; Alexandra Seghers; Lode Sweldens; Jeroen Vandenbussche; Guido Vanham; Elke Wollants; Bert Aertgeerts
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.