Literature DB >> 33406113

Comparing long-term value creation after biotech and non-biotech IPOs, 1997-2016.

Ekaterina Galkina Cleary1, Laura M McNamee2, Skyler de Boer3, Jeremy Holden3, Liam Fitzgerald3, Fred D Ledley4.   

Abstract

We compared the financial performance of 319 BIOTECH companies focused on developing therapeutics with IPOs from 1997-2016, to that of paired, non-biotech CONTROL companies with concurrent IPO dates. BIOTECH companies had a distinctly different financial structure with high R&D expense, little revenue, and negative profits (losses), but a similar duration of listing on public markets and frequency of acquisitions. Through 2016, BIOTECH and CONTROL companies had equivalent growth in market cap and shareholder value (>$100 billion), but BIOTECH companies had lower net value creation ($93 billion vs $411 billion). Both cohorts exhibited a high-risk/high reward pattern of return, with the majority losing value, but many achieving growth multiples. While investments in biotechnology are often considered to be distinctively risky, we conclude that value creation by biotech companies after IPO resembles that of non-biotech companies at a similar stage and does not present a disproportionate investment risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406113      PMCID: PMC7787373          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  Company stock prices before and after public announcements related to oncology drugs.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rothenstein; George Tomlinson; Ian F Tannock; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech.

Authors:  Gary P Pisano
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2006-10

3.  Making the biotech IPO work.

Authors:  Laura McNamee; Fred Ledley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Beyond the biotech IPO: a brave new world.

Authors:  Bruce L Booth
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Public biotech in 2014--the numbers.

Authors:  Chris Morrison; Riku Lähteenmäki
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Biotech's baby boom.

Authors:  John Hodgson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Boom: 2018's biotech IPOs.

Authors:  Chris Morrison
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Henry G Grabowski; Ronald W Hansen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Stock market returns and clinical trial results of investigational compounds: an event study analysis of large biopharmaceutical companies.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Translational science by public biotechnology companies in the IPO "class of 2000": the impact of technological maturity.

Authors:  Laura McNamee; Fred Ledley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.