Literature DB >> 33406092

Insights into elections: An ensemble bot detection coverage framework applied to the 2018 U.S. midterm elections.

Ross J Schuchard1, Andrew T Crooks2,3.   

Abstract

The participation of automated software agents known as social bots within online social network (OSN) engagements continues to grow at an immense pace. Choruses of concern speculate as to the impact social bots have within online communications as evidence shows that an increasing number of individuals are turning to OSNs as a primary source for information. This automated interaction proliferation within OSNs has led to the emergence of social bot detection efforts to better understand the extent and behavior of social bots. While rapidly evolving and continually improving, current social bot detection efforts are quite varied in their design and performance characteristics. Therefore, social bot research efforts that rely upon only a single bot detection source will produce very limited results. Our study expands beyond the limitation of current social bot detection research by introducing an ensemble bot detection coverage framework that harnesses the power of multiple detection sources to detect a wider variety of bots within a given OSN corpus of Twitter data. To test this framework, we focused on identifying social bot activity within OSN interactions taking place on Twitter related to the 2018 U.S. Midterm Election by using three available bot detection sources. This approach clearly showed that minimal overlap existed between the bot accounts detected within the same tweet corpus. Our findings suggest that social bot research efforts must incorporate multiple detection sources to account for the variety of social bots operating in OSNs, while incorporating improved or new detection methods to keep pace with the constant evolution of bot complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406092      PMCID: PMC7787377          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  19 in total

1.  Social media and suicide: a public health perspective.

Authors:  David D Luxton; Jennifer D June; Jonathan M Fairall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Collective Behavior of Social Bots Is Encoded in Their Temporal Twitter Activity.

Authors:  Andrej Duh; Marjan Slak Rupnik; Dean Korošak
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  UpSet: Visualization of Intersecting Sets.

Authors:  Alexander Lex; Nils Gehlenborg; Hendrik Strobelt; Romain Vuillemot; Hanspeter Pfister
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.579

4.  Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia.

Authors:  Milena Tsvetkova; Ruth García-Gavilanes; Luciano Floridi; Taha Yasseri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election.

Authors:  John Bryden; Eric Silverman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of augmented humans in online interactions during voting events.

Authors:  Massimo Stella; Marco Cristoforetti; Manlio De Domenico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predicting national suicide numbers with social media data.

Authors:  Hong-Hee Won; Woojae Myung; Gil-Young Song; Won-Hee Lee; Jong-Won Kim; Bernard J Carroll; Doh Kwan Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems.

Authors:  Massimo Stella; Emilio Ferrara; Manlio De Domenico
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.

Authors:  Chengcheng Shao; Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia; Onur Varol; Kai-Cheng Yang; Alessandro Flammini; Filippo Menczer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.

Authors:  Alexandre Bovet; Hernán A Makse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.