Literature DB >> 33406078

Phylogenetic diversity of 200+ isolates of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum associated with Populus trichocarpa soils in the Pacific Northwest, USA and comparison to globally distributed representatives.

Jessica M Vélez1,2, Reese M Morris1, Rytas Vilgalys3, Jessy Labbé1, Christopher W Schadt1,2,4.   

Abstract

The ectomycorrhizal fungal symbiont Cenococcum geophilum is of high interest as it is globally distributed, associates with many plant species, and has resistance to multiple environmental stressors. C. geophilum is only known from asexual states but is often considered a cryptic species complex, since extreme phylogenetic divergence is often observed within nearly morphologically identical strains. Alternatively, C. geophilum may represent a highly diverse single species, which would suggest cryptic but frequent recombination. Here we describe a new isolate collection of 229 C. geophilum isolates from soils under Populus trichocarpa at 123 collection sites spanning a ~283 mile north-south transect in Western Washington and Oregon, USA (PNW). To further understanding of the phylogenetic relationships within C. geophilum, we performed maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses to assess divergence within the PNW isolate collection, as well as a global phylogenetic analysis of 789 isolates with publicly available data from the United States, Japan, and European countries. Phylogenetic analyses of the PNW isolates revealed three distinct phylogenetic groups, with 15 clades that strongly resolved at >80% bootstrap support based on a GAPDH phylogeny and one clade segregating strongly in two principle component analyses. The abundance and representation of PNW isolate clades varied greatly across the North-South range, including a monophyletic group of isolates that spanned nearly the entire gradient at ~250 miles. A direct comparison between the GAPDH and ITS rRNA gene region phylogenies, combined with additional analyses revealed stark incongruence between the ITS and GAPDH gene regions, consistent with intra-species recombination between PNW isolates. In the global isolate collection phylogeny, 34 clades were strongly resolved using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian approaches (at >80% MLBS and >0.90 BPP respectively), with some clades having intra- and intercontinental distributions. Together these data are highly suggestive of divergence within multiple cryptic species, however additional analyses such as higher resolution genotype-by-sequencing approaches are needed to distinguish potential species boundaries and the mode and tempo of recombination patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406078      PMCID: PMC7787446          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  45 in total

1.  Molecular prospecting for cryptic species of nematodes: mitochondrial DNA versus internal transcribed spacer.

Authors:  Michael S Blouin
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Intragenomic variation of fungal ribosomal genes is higher than previously thought.

Authors:  Uwe K Simon; Michael Weiss
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Using Populus as a lignocellulosic feedstock for bioethanol.

Authors:  Ilga Porth; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Phylogenetic divergence in a local population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum.

Authors:  G W Douhan; D M Rizzo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Poplar genomics is getting popular: the impact of the poplar genome project on tree research.

Authors:  G A Tuskan; S P DiFazio; T Teichmann
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.081

7.  Mycorrhizal response to experimental pH and P manipulation in acidic hardwood forests.

Authors:  Laurel A Kluber; Sarah R Carrino-Kyker; Kaitlin P Coyle; Jared L DeForest; Charlotte R Hewins; Alanna N Shaw; Kurt A Smemo; David J Burke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome.

Authors:  M A Cregger; A M Veach; Z K Yang; M J Crouch; R Vilgalys; G A Tuskan; C W Schadt
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Secretome Analysis from the Ectomycorrhizal Ascomycete Cenococcum geophilum.

Authors:  Maíra de Freitas Pereira; Claire Veneault-Fourrey; Patrice Vion; Fréderic Guinet; Emmanuelle Morin; Kerrie W Barry; Anna Lipzen; Vasanth Singan; Stephanie Pfister; Hyunsoo Na; Megan Kennedy; Simon Egli; Igor Grigoriev; Francis Martin; Annegret Kohler; Martina Peter
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Association mapping, transcriptomics, and transient expression identify candidate genes mediating plant-pathogen interactions in a tree.

Authors:  Wellington Muchero; Kelsey L Sondreli; Jin-Gui Chen; Breeanna R Urbanowicz; Jin Zhang; Vasanth Singan; Yongil Yang; Robert S Brueggeman; Juan Franco-Coronado; Nivi Abraham; Jeong-Yeh Yang; Kelley W Moremen; Alexandra J Weisberg; Jeff H Chang; Erika Lindquist; Kerrie Barry; Priya Ranjan; Sara Jawdy; Jeremy Schmutz; Gerald A Tuskan; Jared M LeBoldus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cryptic genetic structure and copy-number variation in the ubiquitous forest symbiotic fungus Cenococcum geophilum.

Authors:  Martina Peter; Daniel Croll; Benjamin Dauphin; Maíra de Freitas Pereira; Annegret Kohler; Igor V Grigoriev; Kerrie Barry; Hyunsoo Na; Mojgan Amirebrahimi; Anna Lipzen; Francis Martin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.476

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.