Literature DB >> 33404808

Reasons for disagreement between proxy-report and self-report rating of symptoms in children receiving cancer therapies.

Deborah Tomlinson1, Erin Plenert2, Grace Dadzie2, Robyn Loves2, Sadie Cook2, Tal Schechter3, L Lee Dupuis2,4,5, Lillian Sung2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To qualitatively describe reasons for disagreement in ratings of bothersome symptoms between child self-report and parent proxy-report.
METHODS: We enrolled child and parent dyads, who understood English and where children (4-18 years of age) were diagnosed with cancer or were hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Each child and parent separately reported symptoms using self-report or proxy-report Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi). We then used semi-structured interviews to elicit reasons for discrepancies in symptom reporting.
RESULTS: We enrolled 12 dyads in each of four age cohorts, resulting in 48 dyads. Forty-one dyads (85.4%) had disagreement in rating the presence or absence of at least one symptom. Themes identified as reasons for disagreement included (1) perception, differing perception of symptom or availability or palatability of intervention; (2) understanding, difficulty orienting to time frame or concept of bother; (3) lack of communication, including child not acknowledging or talking about experiences; (4) projection, of how the parent felt or how they assumed the child would feel; and (5) discrepancy, in how the amount of symptom bother that was initially reported on SSPedi, by either child or parent, did not align with what was reported during the dyad discussion.
CONCLUSION: We identified themes that explained disagreement in ratings of bothersome symptoms between child self-report and parent proxy-report. Some disagreement may be reduced by enhancing communication about symptom reporting between child and parent. Future research should focus on methods of symptom screening that encourage communication between children with cancer and their caregivers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Cancer; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Pediatrics; Proxy-report; SSPedi; Self-report; Symptom screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33404808     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05930-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  13 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in childhood cancer: discrepancy in parent-child reports.

Authors:  R B Levi; D Drotar
Journal:  Int J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Assessment of health-related quality of life in children with cancer: consistency and agreement between parent and child reports.

Authors:  Kathryn M W Russell; Melissa Hudson; Alanna Long; Sean Phipps
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Three sides to a story: Child, parent, and nurse perspectives on the child's experience during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christina K Ullrich; Angie Mae Rodday; Kristin M Bingen; Mary Jo Kupst; Sunita K Patel; Karen L Syrjala; Lynnette L Harris; Christopher J Recklitis; Grace Chang; Eva C Guinan; Norma Terrin; Hocine Tighiouart; Sean Phipps; Susan K Parsons
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Ernest R Katz; Kathy Meeske; Paige Dickinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Health-related quality of life and symptom reporting: similarities and differences between children and their parents.

Authors:  Christine Eiser; James W Varni
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Quality of Life in Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Siblings: The Consensus Between Parent-Proxy and Self-Reports.

Authors:  Fiona Schulte; Amanda Wurz; Kathleen Reynolds; Douglas Strother; Deborah Dewey
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Literature review: health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: hearing the voices of the children.

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine Limbers; Tasha M Burwinkle
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-03-08

8.  How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life?: an analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine A Limbers; Tasha M Burwinkle
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Discordance between pediatric self-report and parent proxy-report symptom scores and creation of a dyad symptom screening tool (co-SSPedi).

Authors:  Deborah Tomlinson; Erin Plenert; Grace Dadzie; Robyn Loves; Sadie Cook; Tal Schechter; Jennifer Furtado; L Lee Dupuis; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.

Authors:  Benjamin Saunders; Julius Sim; Tom Kingstone; Shula Baker; Jackie Waterfield; Bernadette Bartlam; Heather Burroughs; Clare Jinks
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2017-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.