Saskia Vande Perre1,2, Loïc Duron2, Audrey Milon1, Asma Bekhouche1, Daniel Balvay2, Francois H Cornelis1,3, Laure Fournier2,4, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara5,6. 1. Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. 2. PARCC, INSERM, Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France. 3. ISCD, Sorbonne Université, 75005, Paris, France. 4. HEGP, APHP Université de Paris, Univ Paris 06, IUC, 75015, Paris, France. 5. Tenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. isabelle.thomassin@tnn.aphp.fr. 6. ISCD, Sorbonne Université, 75005, Paris, France. isabelle.thomassin@tnn.aphp.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of radiomic analysis using high temporal resolution (HTR)-dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MR sequences compared to BI-RADS analysis to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive women who underwent breast MRI including HTR-DCE MR sequencing for abnormal enhancing lesions and who had subsequent pathological analysis at our tertiary center. Semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and textural features were extracted. Temporal change across each phase of textural features in HTR-DCE MR sequences was calculated and called "kinetic textural parameters." Statistical analysis by LASSO logistic regression and cross validation was performed to build a model. The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model was compared to the results of BI-RADS MR score analysis. RESULTS: We included 117 women with a mean age of 54 years (28-88). Of the 174 lesions analyzed, 75 were benign and 99 malignant. Seven semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and 57 textural features were extracted. Regression analysis selected 15 significant variables in a radiomic model (called "malignant probability score") which displayed an AUC = 0.876 (sensitivity = 0.98, specificity = 0.52, accuracy = 0.78). The performance of the malignant probability score to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions (AUC = 0.876, 95%CI 0.825-0.925) was significantly better than that of BI-RADS analysis (AUC = 0.831, 95%CI 0.769-0.892). The radiomic model significantly reduced false positives (42%) with the same number of missed cancers (n = 2). CONCLUSION: A radiomic model including kinetic textural features extracted from an HTR-DCE MR sequence improves diagnostic performance over BI-RADS analysis. KEY POINTS: • Radiomic analysis using HTR-DCE is of better diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.876) than conventional breast MRI reading with BI-RADS (AUC = 0.831) (p < 0.001). • A radiomic malignant probability score under 19.5% gives a negative predictive value of 100% while a malignant probability score over 81% gives a positive predictive value of 100%. • Kinetic textural features extracted from HTR-DCE-MRI have a major role to play in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions.
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of radiomic analysis using high temporal resolution (HTR)-dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MR sequences compared to BI-RADS analysis to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive women who underwent breast MRI including HTR-DCE MR sequencing for abnormal enhancing lesions and who had subsequent pathological analysis at our tertiary center. Semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and textural features were extracted. Temporal change across each phase of textural features in HTR-DCE MR sequences was calculated and called "kinetic textural parameters." Statistical analysis by LASSO logistic regression and cross validation was performed to build a model. The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model was compared to the results of BI-RADS MR score analysis. RESULTS: We included 117 women with a mean age of 54 years (28-88). Of the 174 lesions analyzed, 75 were benign and 99 malignant. Seven semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and 57 textural features were extracted. Regression analysis selected 15 significant variables in a radiomic model (called "malignant probability score") which displayed an AUC = 0.876 (sensitivity = 0.98, specificity = 0.52, accuracy = 0.78). The performance of the malignant probability score to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions (AUC = 0.876, 95%CI 0.825-0.925) was significantly better than that of BI-RADS analysis (AUC = 0.831, 95%CI 0.769-0.892). The radiomic model significantly reduced false positives (42%) with the same number of missed cancers (n = 2). CONCLUSION: A radiomic model including kinetic textural features extracted from an HTR-DCE MR sequence improves diagnostic performance over BI-RADS analysis. KEY POINTS: • Radiomic analysis using HTR-DCE is of better diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.876) than conventional breast MRI reading with BI-RADS (AUC = 0.831) (p < 0.001). • A radiomic malignant probability score under 19.5% gives a negative predictive value of 100% while a malignant probability score over 81% gives a positive predictive value of 100%. • Kinetic textural features extracted from HTR-DCE-MRI have a major role to play in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions.
Authors: Ritse M Mann; Roel D Mus; Jan van Zelst; Christian Geppert; Nico Karssemeijer; Bram Platel Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.016