Literature DB >> 33403990

The effect of lockdown regulations on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

J Pillai1, P Motloba, K S C Motaung, L U Ozougwu, B K Ikalafeng, E Marinda, M Lukhele, D Basu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On 26 March 2020, the South African (SA) government initiated a 21-day national level 5 lockdown which was subsequently eased off and downgraded to level 4 on 1 May and to level 3 on 1 June. The effect of lockdown measures on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity is currently uncertain. In this article, we analyse the effects of the lockdown measures on the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in one of the epicentres in SA.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the effects of lockdown measures introduced in SA on SARS-CoV-2 attack rates (ARs, the percentage of individuals who tested positive in a specified time period) in Gauteng Province during a 4-month period (March - June 2020).
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used a comprehensive database from an independent pathology laboratory in Gauteng. We analysed trends of positivity rates of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests done during the 4-month period. The ARs are reported over time (unweighted and age-weighted 14-day moving averages) by age groups, gender, and different regions/districts in Gauteng.
RESULTS: A total of 162 528 tests were performed at a private laboratory between 5 March and 30 June 2020, of which 20 574 were positive (overall AR 12.7%). These positive tests constituted 44.8% of all positive cases in the province (20 574/45 944). Sixty-two percent of all tests were done in June during lockdown level 3. There was an exponential increase in the AR in June (18.3%) when lockdown was eased to level 3, in comparison with 4.2% (March), 2.2% (April) and 3.3% (May). The increase in June was seen in all the age groups, although it was more pronounced in the 21 - 60 years age groups than the younger (0 - 20 years) and older (>60 years) age groups. The AR was significantly higher in males (13.2%) compared with females (12.1%) (χ2 test, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study testify to the rapid increase in ARs resulting from easing of the lockdown regulations, especially to level 3 in June. Of concern is the upward trend in the AR across all age groups, especially <20 years (15.9%), which was not reported in other parts of the world. Population age dynamics should therefore be considered when taking future decisions about lockdown regulations.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33403990     DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i11.15222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  4 in total

1.  COVID-19 Daily Realities for Families: A South African Sample.

Authors:  Kezia Ruth October; Lisa Rene' Petersen; Babatope Adebiyi; Edna Rich; Nicolette Vanessa Roman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shabnam Iezadi; Kamal Gholipour; Saber Azami-Aghdash; Akbar Ghiasi; Aziz Rezapour; Hamid Pourasghari; Fariba Pashazadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Inequalities in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study of inequalities in mortality in the first wave and the effects of the first national lockdown in England.

Authors:  Claire Welsh; Viviana Albani; Fiona Matthews; Clare Bambra
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stella Talic; Shivangi Shah; Holly Wild; Danijela Gasevic; Ashika Maharaj; Zanfina Ademi; Xue Li; Wei Xu; Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray; Jasmin Rostron; Evropi Theodoratou; Xiaomeng Zhang; Ashmika Motee; Danny Liew; Dragan Ilic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-11-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.