V Baccolini1,2, A Rosso3,4, C Di Paolo3, C Isonne3, C Salerno3, G Migliara3, G P Prencipe3, A Massimi3, C Marzuillo3, C De Vito3, P Villari3, F Romano3. 1. Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. valentina.baccolini@uniroma1.it. 2. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. valentina.baccolini@uniroma1.it. 3. Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 4. Local Health Unit Roma 2, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that low health literacy (HL) is associated with several adverse outcomes. In this study, we systematically reviewed the prevalence of low HL in Europe. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Cross-sectional studies conducted in the European Union (EU), published from 2000, investigating the prevalence of low HL in adults using a reliable tool, were included. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inverse-variance random effects methods were used to produce pooled prevalence estimates. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the association between low HL and the characteristics of the studies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of low HL ranged from of 27% (95% CI: 18-38%) to 48% (95% CI: 41-55%), depending on the literacy assessment method applied. Southern, Western, and Eastern EU countries had lower HL compared to northern Europe (β: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.40-1.35; β: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.25-0.93; and β: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.06-1.37, respectively). The assessment method significantly influenced the pooled estimate: compared to word recognition items, using self-reported comprehensions items (β: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.15-1.08), reading or numeracy comprehensions items (β: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.24-1.31), or a mixed method (β: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.01-1.33) found higher rates of low HL. Refugees had the lowest HL (β: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.26-2.92). Finally, lower quality studies reported higher rates of low HL (β: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06-1.07). DISCUSSION: We found that low HL is a public health challenge throughout Europe, where one in every three to almost one in every two Europeans may not be able to understand essential health-related material. Additional research is needed to investigate the underlying causes and to develop remedies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42019133377.
BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that low health literacy (HL) is associated with several adverse outcomes. In this study, we systematically reviewed the prevalence of low HL in Europe. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Cross-sectional studies conducted in the European Union (EU), published from 2000, investigating the prevalence of low HL in adults using a reliable tool, were included. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inverse-variance random effects methods were used to produce pooled prevalence estimates. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the association between low HL and the characteristics of the studies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of low HL ranged from of 27% (95% CI: 18-38%) to 48% (95% CI: 41-55%), depending on the literacy assessment method applied. Southern, Western, and Eastern EU countries had lower HL compared to northern Europe (β: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.40-1.35; β: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.25-0.93; and β: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.06-1.37, respectively). The assessment method significantly influenced the pooled estimate: compared to word recognition items, using self-reported comprehensions items (β: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.15-1.08), reading or numeracy comprehensions items (β: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.24-1.31), or a mixed method (β: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.01-1.33) found higher rates of low HL. Refugees had the lowest HL (β: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.26-2.92). Finally, lower quality studies reported higher rates of low HL (β: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06-1.07). DISCUSSION: We found that low HL is a public health challenge throughout Europe, where one in every three to almost one in every two Europeans may not be able to understand essential health-related material. Additional research is needed to investigate the underlying causes and to develop remedies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42019133377.
Entities:
Keywords:
Europe; health literacy; meta-analysis; prevalence; systematic review
Authors: S Y Ibrahim; F Reid; A Shaw; G Rowlands; G B Gomez; M Chesnokov; M Ussher Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Ruben M Strijbos; Jan-Willem Hinnen; Ronald F F van den Haak; Bart A N Verhoeven; Olivier H J Koning Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: T M van Schaik; H T Jørstad; T B Twickler; R J G Peters; J P G Tijssen; M L Essink-Bot; M P Fransen Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Antonio Chiarenza; Marie Dauvrin; Valentina Chiesa; Sonia Baatout; Hans Verrept Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Claudia Isonne; Maria Roberta De Blasiis; Federica Turatto; Elena Mazzalai; Carolina Marzuillo; Corrado De Vito; Paolo Villari; Valentina Baccolini Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Janina I Steinert; Henrike Sternberg; Hannah Prince; Barbara Fasolo; Matteo M Galizzi; Tim Büthe; Giuseppe A Veltri Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 14.957
Authors: Sławomir Januszek; Natalia Siwiec; Rafał Januszek; Marta Kluz; Roman Lebed; Paweł Toś; Tomasz Góra; Krzysztof Plens; Krzysztof Dąbrowski; Marcin Sidorowicz; Aleksandra Szcześniewska; Edyta Barnaś; Katarzyna Kalandyk-Osinko; Dorota Darmochwal-Kolarz; Tomasz Kluz Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2022-02-08
Authors: Patrizio Zanobini; Chiara Lorini; Vieri Lastrucci; Valentina Minardi; Valentina Possenti; Maria Masocco; Giorgio Garofalo; Giovanna Mereu; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz; Günter Dietz; Nicole Renken; Ruben Schmöger; Anna Levke Brütt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Neida Neto Vicente Ramos; Inês Fronteira; Maria Rosário Oliveira Martins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.390