BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that curative resection (R0 resection) was among the most crucial factors for the long-term survival of patients with PHCC. To achieve R0 resection, we performed the transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limits of division of the hepatic ducts. Although a recent report showed that the resection margin (RM) status impacted PHCC patients' survival, it is still unclear whether RM is an important clinical factor. OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique of transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limit of division of hepatic ducts, investigate its short-term surgical outcome, and validate whether the radial margin (RM) would have a clinical impact on long-term survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) patients. METHODS: Consecutive PHCC patients (n = 211) who had undergone major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, without pancreaticoduodenectomy, in our department were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: R0 resection rate was 92% and 86% for invasive cancer-free and both invasive cancer-free and high-grade dysplasia-free resection, respectively. Overall 5-year survival rate was 46.9%. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (> 7.0 mg/dl), pathological lymph node metastasis, and portal vein invasion were independent risk factors, but R status on both resection margin and bile duct margin was not an independent risk factor for survival. CONCLUSION: The transhepatic direct approach to the limits of division of the bile ducts leads to the highest R0 resection rate in the horizontal margin of PHCC. Further examination will be needed to determine the adjuvant therapy for PHCC to improve patient survival.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that curative resection (R0 resection) was among the most crucial factors for the long-term survival of patients with PHCC. To achieve R0 resection, we performed the transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limits of division of the hepatic ducts. Although a recent report showed that the resection margin (RM) status impacted PHCC patients' survival, it is still unclear whether RM is an important clinical factor. OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique of transhepatic direct approach and resection on the limit of division of hepatic ducts, investigate its short-term surgical outcome, and validate whether the radial margin (RM) would have a clinical impact on long-term survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) patients. METHODS: Consecutive PHCC patients (n = 211) who had undergone major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, without pancreaticoduodenectomy, in our department were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: R0 resection rate was 92% and 86% for invasive cancer-free and both invasive cancer-free and high-grade dysplasia-free resection, respectively. Overall 5-year survival rate was 46.9%. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (> 7.0 mg/dl), pathological lymph node metastasis, and portal vein invasion were independent risk factors, but R status on both resection margin and bile duct margin was not an independent risk factor for survival. CONCLUSION: The transhepatic direct approach to the limits of division of the bile ducts leads to the highest R0 resection rate in the horizontal margin of PHCC. Further examination will be needed to determine the adjuvant therapy for PHCC to improve patient survival.
Entities:
Keywords:
Limit of dividing of the bile duct; Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; R0 resection rate; Surgical technique; Transhepatic direct approach
Authors: Thuy B Tran; Cecilia G Ethun; Timothy M Pawlik; Carl Schmidt; Eliza W Beal; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; George A Poultsides Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kenichi Matsuo; Flavio G Rocha; Kaori Ito; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P Dematteo; Mithat Gonen; Itaru Endo; William R Jarnagin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sung Gyu Lee; Gi Won Song; Shin Hwang; Tae Yong Ha; Deok Bog Moon; Dong Hwan Jung; Ki Hun Kim; Chul Soo Ahn; Myung Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Kyu Bo Sung; Gi Young Ko Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 7.027
Authors: Pim B Olthof; Mamoru Miyasaka; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jimme K Wiggers; William R Jarnagin; Takehiro Noji; Satoshi Hirano; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 3.647