Literature DB >> 33403549

Comparison of high flow nasal oxygen and conventional nasal cannula during gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation in the prone position: a randomized trial.

Seung Hyun Kim1, Seungmin Bang2, Ki-Young Lee1, Seung Woo Park2, Jeong Youp Park2, Hee Seung Lee2, Hanseul Oh3, Young Jun Oh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can be challenging in elderly patients in the prone position. This study investigated the effect of a high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) delivery system on oxygenation in this procedure compared with that of conventional nasal cannula oxygen administration.
METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was conducted using HFNO and conventional nasal cannula in patients undergoing ERCP in the prone position. For each patient, the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2), the incidence of hypoxemia defined as an SpO2 below 90%, and interruptions due to airway interventions were recorded during the procedure.
RESULTS: The lowest mean (standard deviation) SpO2 recorded during the procedure was higher in the HFNO group than in the conventional control group [99.8 (0.6)% vs 95.1 (7.3)%; mean difference, 4.7%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3% to 7.1%; P Group x Time < 0.001]. While the lowest SpO2 during the procedure was lower than the baseline SpO2 in the control group, the lowest SpO2 during the procedure was higher than the baseline SpO2 in the HFNO group. Hypoxemia occurred only in the control group (n = 7; 19%; P = 0.01). Procedural interruptions, including discontinuation of sedation, patient stimulation, and jaw thrusting, occurred only in the control group (n = 9 [25%], n = 10 [28%], and n = 10 [28%] cases, respectively; P = 0.001 for each).
CONCLUSION: In contrast to conventional nasal cannula, high flow nasal oxygen provided adequate oxygenation without causing procedural interruptions during ERCP, suggesting that HFNO may be used as a standard oxygen delivery method during these procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03872674); registered 11 March 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopy; high flow nasal oxygen; sedation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403549     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01883-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  2 in total

1.  High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Oriol Roca; Jordi Riera; Ferran Torres; Joan R Masclans
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Corrigendum: Fluid responsiveness in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Young-Eun Jang; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-29
  2 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis comparing the efficiency of high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Mohamed Gamal; Manar Ahmed Kamal; Mohamed Abuelazm; Amman Yousaf; Basel Abdelazeem
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 2.  Should We Use High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients Receiving Gastrointestinal Endoscopies? Critical Appraisals through Updated Meta-Analyses with Multiple Methodologies and Depiction of Certainty of Evidence.

Authors:  Chi Chan Lee; Teressa Reanne Ju; Pei Chun Lai; Hsin-Ti Lin; Yen Ta Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Xin Zhang; Xing-Xiang He; Yu-Ping Chen; Shuai Yang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  High flow nasal cannula for patients undergoing bronchoscopy and gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Tao; Mingyang Sun; Mengrong Miao; Yaqian Han; Yitian Yang; Xuhui Cong; Jiaqiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.