Nikolai F Bunkin1,2, Alexey P Glinushkin3, Alexey V Shkirin2, Dmitriy N Ignatenko2, Sergey N Chirikov4, Ivan V Savchenko3, Valery P Meshalkin5, Gennady N Samarin6, Alireza Maleki7,8, Valery P Kalinitchenko3,9. 1. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 5 2nd Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia. 2. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov St. 38, Moscow 119991, Russia. 3. All-Russia Research Institute for Phytopathology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Big Vyazyomy, Moscow Region 143050, Russia. 4. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 31 Kashirskoe sh., Moscow 115409, Russia. 5. D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 9 Miusskaya square, Moscow 125047, Russia. 6. Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM" (FSAC VIM), 5 First Institutskiy pr-d, Moscow 109428, Russia. 7. Institute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia. 8. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia. 9. Institute of Fertility of Soils of South Russia, 2 Krivoshlykova St., Persianovka 346493, Russia.
Abstract
The origin of organic matter, its spread, scattering, and functioning are influenced by the physical structure of liquid or dispersed media of organic matter. Refractive indices of fodder yeast grown on paraffin oil (paprin) and natural gas (gaprin) as well as Lycoperdon spore and organelles were measured by laser phase microscopy. The scattering matrices of aqueous suspensions of paprin, gaprin, and Lycoperdon spores were measured using a laser polarimeter with the scattering angle ranging from 20 to 150°. The experimentally measured scattering matrices have been approximated by the weighted sum of theoretically calculated scattering matrices using the T-matrix code developed by Mishchenko. Most of the particle radii in the filtered fraction of paprin and gaprin were within the range of about 0.05-0.12 μm. Particle radii of the Lycoperdon spore suspension were within the range of 0.4-2.4 μm, which corresponded to both whole spores and their separate organelles. A possibility of identifying a suspension by its scattering matrices was shown for a small difference in the real parts of the refractive index in the example of paprin and gaprin. The measurements of the light scattering matrix showed that for a small size parameter of about 1, the identification of paprin and gaprin can be based only on a difference in the particle shape. Refractive index difference is manifested for the size parameter values higher than 3. An example of a suspension consisting of micron-sized spores and their submicron organelles shows high sensitivity of the scattering matrix to the composition of the dispersed material. The presented data and models help to extrapolate the results of the light scattering matrix study to a vast spectrum of media of organic matter origin and functioning. This study focused on the Biogeosystem Technique (BGT*) transcendental methodology to manage soil as an arena of biodegradation and organic synthesis. A BGT*-based robotic system for intra-soil pulse continuous-discrete water and matter supply directly into the dispersed-aggregated physical structure of the soil media was developed. The system enables transformation of soil into a stable highly productive organic chemical bioreactor for better controlled nanoparticle biomolecular interactions and adsorption by biological and mineral media. The scattering matrix measurement unit is supposed to be used in the robotic system as a diagnostic tool for the dispersion composition of soil organic components.
The origin of organic matter, its spread, scattering, and functioning are influenced by the physical structure of liquid or dispersed media of organic matter. Refractive indices of fodder yeast grown on paraffin oil (paprin) and natural gas (gaprin) as well as Lycoperdon spore and organelles were measured by laser phase microscopy. The scattering matrices of aqueous suspensions of paprin, gaprin, and Lycoperdon spores were measured using a laser polarimeter with the scattering angle ranging from 20 to 150°. The experimentally measured scattering matrices have been approximated by the weighted sum of theoretically calculated scattering matrices using the T-matrix code developed by Mishchenko. Most of the particle radii in the filtered fraction of paprin and gaprin were within the range of about 0.05-0.12 μm. Particle radii of the Lycoperdon spore suspension were within the range of 0.4-2.4 μm, which corresponded to both whole spores and their separate organelles. A possibility of identifying a suspension by its scattering matrices was shown for a small difference in the real parts of the refractive index in the example of paprin and gaprin. The measurements of the light scattering matrix showed that for a small size parameter of about 1, the identification of paprin and gaprin can be based only on a difference in the particle shape. Refractive index difference is manifested for the size parameter values higher than 3. An example of a suspension consisting of micron-sized spores and their submicron organelles shows high sensitivity of the scattering matrix to the composition of the dispersed material. The presented data and models help to extrapolate the results of the light scattering matrix study to a vast spectrum of media of organic matter origin and functioning. This study focused on the Biogeosystem Technique (BGT*) transcendental methodology to manage soil as an arena of biodegradation and organic synthesis. A BGT*-based robotic system for intra-soil pulse continuous-discrete water and matter supply directly into the dispersed-aggregated physical structure of the soil media was developed. The system enables transformation of soil into a stable highly productive organic chemical bioreactor for better controlled nanoparticle biomolecular interactions and adsorption by biological and mineral media. The scattering matrix measurement unit is supposed to be used in the robotic system as a diagnostic tool for the dispersion composition of soil organic components.
The physical structure
of liquid and solid media influences the
origin, spread, scattering, and functioning of organic matter as dispersed
media. Soil is an important dispersed and aggregated media for biological
processes. The challenge is to understand the drivers of organic and
mineral phase interactions, to control the process of organic matter
synthesis and optimize the trophic chains in the soil as in a large
organic chemistry reactor.[1] Recognition
(identification) of dispersed media and organic matter by their scattering
matrices is of great fundamental and applied importance.[2−5] Studies on dispersed media are linked to the new technologies of
production of artificial mineral and organic matter. Different techniques
and models are used for the quantitative characterization of dispersed
media.[6−16] New technological conditions are promising for increased target
product output. Characteristics of the natural and artificial organic
chemistry products depend on both the properties of production medium
and the medium of organic matter application. The properties of organic
matter applied to the soil influence the phytopathological status
of agrocenosis and a quality of yield. Organic substances applied
to the soil provide a higher plant resistance to pathogens. Hence,
it is highly important to obtain all possible information about newly
invented unnatural products, especially the organic synthesis products.
The importance of the new approaches in a multifaceted study of organic
products becomes even higher in the example of soil organic matter
(SOM), which is crucial for the pedosphere as an indispensable agent
for full-scale functioning of the biosphere.[17] SOM in the field of soil science was previously characterized by
the humus content. The traditional humus study methodology is focused
on C content determination. The presumption of the humus methodology
was based on the resemblance of the natural SOM synthesis process
in different soils.[18] Humus content comparison
has been accepted as a reliable method to compare different soils
and assess which soil has highly productivity. Currently, increased
technological influence on soil distorts an acceptability of the humus
criterion. The C content of soil can be increased artificially in
the current standard technology framework. But this is not a reliable
basis for the subsequent assessment of the soil fertility because
the standard technologies lead to uncertain consequences in the soil
system.[19] On the contrary, the up-to-date
soil management technology based on the new Biogeosystem Technique
(BGT*) methodology can provide a higher level of certainty of the
soil system and lead to higher soil productivity even with a small
increment in the humus content.[19−25] In this case, the use of the standard data on the soil C content
leads to the underestimation of soil productivity. Agrophysical assessment
of alluvial calcareous soil of the Cumra Region of Central Anatolia
in Turkey showed that this soil is highly fertile, but the soil humus
content is less than 2%. The latest humic substance studies are based
on the up-to-date high tech equipment for SOM molecular composition
research. The corresponding high-level software is used.[26−28] The methodology helps to characterize humic substances in more detail.Currently, SOM manifestations in the soil are very modest compared
to the strictly coordinated structural polymicrobial biofilms present
in the colon of a live organism.[29−31] Soil and human (or soil
and animal) microbiomes are closely interrelated, and it is highly
probable that they are driven by analogous mechanisms and similar
organized consortia.[32,33] There are no reliable data on
the occurrence of polymicrobial communities and the structure and
composition of polymicrobial biofilms in soil.[29] Current studies reveal new uncertainties in organic matter
and soil health understanding. A need for new findings in this area
of research is becoming obvious.[34−37] In particular, this will motivate
studies on higher resistivity of plants to pathogens and pathogen
suppression.[38] In soil science, a physical
research methodology is important for the correct interpretation of
different organic chemistry applications taking into account the long-term
biogeochemical changes.[39] The wider use
of physical methods is promising for the multifaceted study of organic
matter. This is linked to different media, different chemical production
strata, and diverse biogeochemical regimes.The scattering matrix
element values depend on the properties of
dispersed particle. The determination of the physical parameters of
particles is currently possible only for a limited set of dispersed
media. This is an additional inspiration for new studies concerning
the measurement of multilevel continuum–individual organic-mineral
aggregates in soil and/or biofilm structure and dimensions.This work aimed at determining the effect of the microphysical
parameters of dispersed organic matter for its identification via
light scattering matrix measurements in the example of protein–vitamin
concentrates (PVCs)—paprin and gaprin. Another aim was to extrapolate
the result of the light scattering matrix study to a vast spectrum
of media of the organic matter, focusing on the application of the
BGT* transcendental methodology to soil as an arena of biodegradation
and organic synthesis.[24,25,40]
Results and Discussion
Theory/Calculation
Theory
Scattering matrices of dispersed
media are important for organic matter identification. The current
approach for the characterization of organic matter (in particular
SOM) is a preliminary study of its molecular composition. This approach
is insufficient for the coordinated organic-mineral structures of
multilevel architecture in soil. Physical methods are crucial for
studying soil as the most complicated chemical reactor of vital importance.
Soil as a continuum of the most complex biomaterial on the earth is
important for the proper management of the environment.[17]The application of the humic substances
(HS) to the soil is an attempt to increase the SOM content.[28] The merit of the HS methodology in this case
is its advantageous ability to characterize the SOM molecular composition
as a whole, both concerning natural or artificial organic substances.[18,26−31] A chemical methodology of organic matter selection or synthesis
underestimates the fact that the physical structure of organic molecules
depends on the properties of the synthesis medium, in particular,
its multilevel architecture. The interrelation of the physical and
chemical methods decides the result of organic matter production as
well as the subsequent successful application of the new organic matter.
In this context, a quantitative physical methodology for characterization
of organic matter is of high importance. This methodology, together
with chemical and biological methods, provides an adequate description
of the form of the studied object and its structure and coordination
in the surrounding liquid and/or solid space.An understanding
of the organic matter uncertainties requires new
findings. A physical research methodology is vital for correct interpretation
of the nature of the organic-mineral product. In our research, physical
methods were used for obtaining reliable quantitative data on the
size distribution parameters of organic matter in a rather narrow
field of PVC synthesis and its control. Theoretical interpretation
of the results obtained is promising for a wider range of organic
matter production and application media, including soil. A feature of the system
under study is the fact that suspensions of protein-containing substances
are characterized by relative refractive index values that are closer
to unity.[2] When analyzing the recognition
conditions, it is assumed that the preparation procedure of the suspension
samples is the same and provides approximately equal average size
of suspended particles with the smallest possible particle size deviation.
In addition, the used concentration of suspended particles, on the
one hand, provides a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio during the
detection of the scattered radiation and, on the other hand, ensures
single scattering.The values of the scattering matrix elements
depend on the size
of the dispersed particles. The type of their size distribution, their
shape and structure, orientation, degree and nature of the agglomeration,
complex refractive index (n + ik), and scattering angle (θ) are important. This requires a
refined methodological approach for the measurement of the structure
and dimensions of the multilevel continuum dispersed media. Due to
a large number of factors affecting the scattering matrix, its recognition
is possible within a limited set of properties of dispersed media.We studied a rather simple organic matter system consisting of
protein–vitamin concentrates (PVCs) and Lycoperdon spores suspended
in water. Our aim was to determine the difference in the microphysical
parameters of organic matter to achieve scattering matrix identification
in paprin, gaprin, and Lycoperdon spore aqueous suspensions.The scattering matrix describes a transformation of incident radiation
polarization state in a medium. For a macroscopically isotropic medium
containing the same number of randomly oriented scatterers and their
mirror-symmetric counterparts, the scattering matrix F(4 × 4) has a block-diagonal form.[41] In this case, the elements F14, F41, F24, F42, F31, F32, F13, and F23 are zero, and F12 = F21 and F34 = −F43. The dependence of the
element F11 on the scattering angle θ
describes the scattering indicatrix of unpolarized radiation. For
spherical particles, F22 = F11 and F33 = F44 in the whole range of the scattering angles.The scattering matrices of the PVC (paprin and gaprin) suspension
have been theoretically simulated using a program developed by Mishchenko.[41] The program implements the T-matrix method for
a randomly oriented spheroid (ellipsoid of revolution) ensemble. The
scattering matrices were modeled for the particle size parameter from
3 to 30.This research was focused on the application of the
BGT* methodology
in the field of organic matter degradation and synthesis, humic substances,
and polymicrobial biofilms present in multilevel dispersed and aggregated
physical systems, including soil as the most complicated system of
the biosphere.The up-to-date soil management technology based
on the BGT* methodology
leads to higher soil productivity.[25] The
physical methods are promising for studying the organic matter multifaceted
manifestations in organic matter synthesis in different media, including
soil as an arena of biodegradation and organic synthesis. The BGT*
methodology ensures the long-term control of the soil structure, architecture,
and soil moisture.[17,38] The BGT* design of soil continuum
provides highly intensive degradation of organic matter and synthesis
to transform soil into a highly productive organic chemical bioreactor
for stable rhizosphere and plant development.[42]
Calculation
The size distribution
of the dispersed particle ensemble is determined by the effective
size parameter xeff = 2πreff/λ and effective width veff(41)where p(r) is the density of distribution of
probability. The shape-determining
parameter is also important in the model of spheroidal particles ε
= a/b, where a and b are the semiaxes of the ellipsoid.The scattering
matrices were modeled for the particle size parameter from 3 to 30.
Correspondingly, the particle distribution width was veff = 0.1–0.3. The imaginary part of the refractive
index (k) was within the range from 0 to 0.1. The
latter is a standard characteristic of proteins.[43] It is important to note that if the relative refractive
index value of suspended particles is close to unity, the change of
distribution width leads to a small change in the dependences F11(θ), f12(θ), and f44(θ), and the
matrix element values change correspondingly. The increase of the
imaginary part of the refractive index leads to a shift of the dependence f44(θ). In turn, the maximum of dependence f12(θ) for the size parameter xeff ≤ 30 shifts toward a smaller θ value.
In addition, our calculations indicated that the manifestation of
absorption reduces the difference in the matrix element values, and
thereby the scattering media recognition procedure becomes less effective.To determine the dispersed composition, the experimentally measured
scattering matrix was approximated by a commonly used weighted sum
of the theoretically calculated scattering matrices of model particles
of various sizes (grades)where
θk is the scattering
angle, αp is the contribution of the corresponding
particle type to the scattering matrix form, Cpsca is the scattering
cross-section, and Fp are the matrix elements
of the pth type of particles calculated in the model of spheroidal
scatterers.Corresponding weight values providing the minimum
mean square deviation
of the theoretical and experimental data determined the particle size
distribution. The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm was used for
the optimization procedure.
Experimental
Study of the Organic Matter Dispersion
in an Example of Paprin, Gaprin, and Mushroom Spores Based on Laser
Diagnostic Methods
The particles of PVC powder and Lycoperdon
spores on a substrate in air are shown in the white light microphotographs
(Figure ). The particles
of PVC powder and Lycoperdon spores were imaged by a laser phase microscope.[44]
Figure 1
White light microphotographs of paprin (a) and gaprin
(b) powder
and Lycoperdon spores (c) on a substrate in air. The size of the white
frame is 8 μm × 8 μm.
White light microphotographs of paprin (a) and gaprin
(b) powder
and Lycoperdon spores (c) on a substrate in air. The size of the white
frame is 8 μm × 8 μm.The micrographic data (Figure ) suggest that the particle shape was close to spherical,
as the ratio of the longitudinal size to the transverse size of the
particle was about 0.5–2.Two-dimensional (2D) distribution
of the optical path difference
(OPD) in the vicinity of PVC particles on a substrate in air is shown
in Figure . Measurements
carried out using a laser phase microscope showed (Figure ) that the real part of the
refractive index for paprin and gaprin was 1.46 and 1.52, respectively.
These values agree with the relative refractive index in water nr = 1.1–1.14 (Figure ). The imaginary part of the refractive index
of proteins, depending on the light wavelength, is limited in the
visible range to the value about 0−0.1.[43]
Figure 2
Laser interferograms displaying 2D distribution of the OPD in the
vicinity of a single particle: paprin (a), gaprin (b), Lycoperdon
spores (c), and spore organelles (d).
Figure 3
Scattering
matrix elements as a function of scattering angle θ
(f = F/F11),
calculated for nonabsorbing spherical particles with different relative
refractive indices nr in two cases of
the size distribution parameters xeff, veff: xeff = 3, veff = 0.3 (nr =
1.05—red solid line, nr = 1.2—blue
solid line, nr = 1.35—green solid
line); xeff = 30, veff = 0.3 (nr = 1.05—red
dashed line, nr = 1.2—blue dashed
line, nr = 1.35—green dashed line).
Laser interferograms displaying 2D distribution of the OPD in the
vicinity of a single particle: paprin (a), gaprin (b), Lycoperdon
spores (c), and spore organelles (d).Scattering
matrix elements as a function of scattering angle θ
(f = F/F11),
calculated for nonabsorbing spherical particles with different relative
refractive indices nr in two cases of
the size distribution parameters xeff, veff: xeff = 3, veff = 0.3 (nr =
1.05—red solid line, nr = 1.2—blue
solid line, nr = 1.35—green solid
line); xeff = 30, veff = 0.3 (nr = 1.05—red
dashed line, nr = 1.2—blue dashed
line, nr = 1.35—green dashed line).The OPD distribution of Lycoperdon spores most
likely shows the
topography of the spore wall, so that the average refractive index
of the spore as a whole is difficult to estimate. The real part of
the refractive index of the spore organelle was estimated to be 1.37.In Figure , the
effect of the particle refractive index on the angular dependence
of the scattering matrix elements of nonabsorbing spherical particles,
calculated for two values of the size parameter, is theoretically
revealed. It is obvious that an increase in the refractive index leads
to a shift of zero f44(θ) and maximum f12(θ) toward higher values of θ,
as well as to a change in the shape of f12(θ). A change in the refractive index has little effect on
the dependence of F11(θ) at the
size parameter of 0.3. The maximum values of f34(θ) increase with the increasing refractive index.The possibility of identifying substances with a small difference
in refractive indices was analyzed from the dependence of the scattering
matrix on the scattering angle θ (Figure ). The calculations were done using the model
of spheroidal scatterers for two fractions of nonabsorbing particles:
fine (xeff = 3) and large (xeff = 30). The following regularities were revealed. Fine
particle identification by the dependences of f12(θ) and f44(θ) is
reliable for no or weak radiation absorption by PVC particles (k ≪ 0.1). In the absence of absorption, the identification
of a larger fraction of particles can be done by the dependences of F11(θ), f12(θ), f44(θ), and f34(θ). Radiation absorption by the particles
of suspensions (k ≈ 0.1) significantly impaired
the procedure of scattering matrix identification.[5]
Figure 4
Scattering matrix elements as a function of scattering angle θ
(f = F/F11),
calculated for nonabsorbing particles with close relative refractive
indices nr in two cases of the size distribution
parameters xeff, veff: xeff = 3, veff = 0.3 (nr = 1.1—orange
line, nr = 1.14—cyan line); xeff = 30, veff =
0.3 (nr = 1.1—purple line, nr = 1.14—blue line). The shaded areas
correspond to variations in the ratio of the transverse particle size
to the longitudinal particle size (shape parameter) in the range from
0.7 to 1.
Scattering matrix elements as a function of scattering angle θ
(f = F/F11),
calculated for nonabsorbing particles with close relative refractive
indices nr in two cases of the size distribution
parameters xeff, veff: xeff = 3, veff = 0.3 (nr = 1.1—orange
line, nr = 1.14—cyan line); xeff = 30, veff =
0.3 (nr = 1.1—purple line, nr = 1.14—blue line). The shaded areas
correspond to variations in the ratio of the transverse particle size
to the longitudinal particle size (shape parameter) in the range from
0.7 to 1.The experimental dependences of
matrix elements on the scattering
angle of paprin, gaprin, and Lycoperdon spore suspensions are shown
in Figure . By f, we mean the matrix elements F normalized to F11 (f = F/F11). The measurement error of F11(θ) f lay within the limits specified
in the Experimental Section and Computational Methods section.
Figure 5
Scattering matrix elements F11(θ), f12(θ), and f44(θ) of aqueous suspensions of paprin of paprin (red dots),
gaprin (blue dots), and Lycoperdon spore (black dots) depending on
the scattering angle θ.
Scattering matrix elements F11(θ), f12(θ), and f44(θ) of aqueous suspensions of paprin of paprin (red dots),
gaprin (blue dots), and Lycoperdon spore (black dots) depending on
the scattering angle θ.The data on the size distribution of paprin and gaprin particles
indicated identification of distribution for both suspensions (Figure ). Nevertheless,
differences in the f12(θ) values
were observed even for suspensions characterized by a size parameter xeff ≈ 1. Such differences can be explained
by the difference in the particle shape from the spheroidal one. Differences
include the flat faces, edges, sharp edges, surface roughness, and
asymmetry of shapes.
Figure 6
Particle size distribution histograms of aqueous suspensions
of
paprin (red bars), gaprin (blue bars), and Lycoperdon spores (black
bars).
Particle size distribution histograms of aqueous suspensions
of
paprin (red bars), gaprin (blue bars), and Lycoperdon spores (black
bars).The data showed that the small
surface irregularity in the value
≪λ does not lead to a noticeable change in the matrix
element.[45,46] The scattering matrices of polyhedral straight
prisms with 4–7 side faces are largely similar.[47] A change in the number of prism faces and the
ratio of the prism height to length or height to base side exhibited
a weak effect on the matrix element dependence on the scattering angle.
Moreover, the irregular aerosol particle scattering properties (for
example, feldspar), which have flat faces and sharp edges, are better
described in the spheroidal scatterer model than in the model of regular
prisms.[47] Therefore, the mere presence
of flat faces and edges does not explain the difference between experimental
and calculated data.For nonabsorbing dispersed media, asymmetric
scatterers models
(asymmetric hexahedrons), and Gaussian spheres describe the experimentally
measured scattering matrices better than the spheroid model.[48,49] This is mainly because the abovementioned models give lower values
of the f34(θ) and |f12(θ)| elements for the same set of size parameters.
In this case, the dependences of f34(θ)
and f44(θ) for asymmetric and symmetric
scatterers (spheroids) are almost similar. The dependence of f22(θ) is similar for asymmetric and symmetric
scatterers but differ by a small shift of the minima (≈10°).
In the Gaussian sphere case, the difference is caused by a smaller f22(θ) minimum value. The discussed peculiarities
allow us to consider the particle asymmetry of the dispersed medium
as the main cause of the difference between experimental dependences
of f(θ) and those calculated for
spheroids.According to Liu et al.,[50] the asymmetry
of the dispersed particles does not affect the matrix element values
at xeff = 0.1 or less. In the case considered,
the difference in the f12(θ) value
of studied suspensions within the Gaussian sphere model framework
is explained by the large value of the particle deformation parameter
for gaprin.[49]The smaller f12 values and the larger f44 values for Lycoperdon spores as compared
to PVC are explained by the large average particle size.The
distributions of particle size of paprin, gaprin, and spores
in the suspensions (Figure ) have been restored using the obtained scattering matrix
data (Figure ). We
used a model of elongated ellipsoid of revolution to describe the
size of PVC particles (ε(ε = 0.7). Most of the particle
sizes are in the range from 0.05 to 0.12 μm. Relative contribution
of the coarse particle fraction of paprin and gaprin was about 10–4–10–5 in the range from 0.35
to 1.0 μm (not shown in Figure ).The particle fraction distribution restored
for the spore suspension
indicates its multicomponent nature with a predominance of individual
organelles, which apparently formed as a result of ultrasonic treatment.
It can be concluded that a relatively small number of large particles
(whole spores) against the background of small particles (organelles)
significantly disturb the scattering matrix. In this case (in contrast
to paprin and gaprin), the product of the fraction of large particles
by their scattering cross-section becomes comparable to the analogous
product for the small particles.
Prospects
of the Organic Matter Study Using
Physical Methods Focusing of the BGT* Methodology
The data
on organic particles can be extrapolated to the framework of the BGT*
transcendental methodology. The BGT* synthesizes soil geophysical
micro- and macro-aggregate multilevel architectures via intra-soil
milling. Focusing on soil organic matter management, the BGT* chemical
soil engineering addresses environmental safety concerns of ecosphere
management.[25] BGT* includes intra-soil
pulse continuous–discrete soil watering, intra-soil waste recycling,
intra-soil milling, and other technical and technological possibilities.
The BGT* methodology ensures a well-dosed intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete
water and matter supply directly to the rhizosphere.[51] This kind of watering of the soil is sufficient for plant
and biota nutrition. The well-controlled and rather low-dosage watering
excludes the over-moistening stage of soil, which is typical for both
standard rainfed agriculture and irrigation. In the case of standard
technology, the soil water regime is closely related to the plant
organogenesis. At the same time, the soil continuum remains stable
under the intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete watering in
the absence of over-moistening. Moreover, intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete
watering is safe and improves the soil structure and architecture.
Natural aggregates and newly formed quasi-crystals and the corresponding
quasi-aggregates in soil are not degraded. Soil quasi-crystals are
a product of the freshly synthesized organic matter and soil mineral–matter
interactions.[52] The soil structure and
architecture provided by the BGT* method suits plant organogenesis.
Low water supply to the soil helps achieving the goal of overcoming
global water scarcity.[35] The BGT* methodology
ensures environmentally safe organic and mineral waste recycling.[53,54] It is also capable of transforming the soil into a more stable highly
productive organic chemical bioreactor, providing the soil regime
and evolution conditions closer to those required for the functioning
of the colon of a living organism.[25,29] BGT* ensures
higher efficacy of HS and nanoparticles, and higher certainty of nanoparticle
biomolecular interactions and adsorption in complex biological media.[9,10,22,23,28,29,42,55]A robotic system
for intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete water and matter supply
directly to the rhizosphere has been developed (Figure ).[51,55] The goal was to transform
the soil into a more stable highly productive chemical organic bioreactor
to ensure the interaction of nanoparticles and biomolecules and adsorption
and functioning of the organic matter in the complex geophysical multilevel
dispersed–aggregated biological media of the soil. The scattering
matrix measuring block is a diagnostic tool of the robotic system
for providing control of its operation.
Figure 7
Intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete
water and matter supply
robotic system.
Intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete
water and matter supply
robotic system.The use of the physical methods
in our research provided reliable
quantitative data on the size distribution parameters of organic matter
in a rather narrow field of PVC synthesis and its control. The obtained
results are promising for the study of organic matter multifaceted
manifestations in different media, as well as for organic matter synthesis
and its subsequent application (Figure ). The drawback of chemical methods for studying organic
matter is that they lack the advantageous ability to characterize
molecular composition.[17,27] The organic molecular physical
structure depends on the properties of the synthesis media.[17,23,27] Synthesis media continuum alters
the synthesis result to a great extent. The structure of the synthesized
product differs even in a relatively simple case of rather homogeneous
synthesis media as in the case of paraffin oil and natural gas. The
paprin or gaprin molecular growth is not limited in a homogeneous
synthesis medium. But the particle size distribution histograms of
aqueous suspensions of paprin and gaprin are not the same even in
the almost ideal synthesis media (Figure ). The nature of organic matter differentiation
is closely linked to the biological diversity tendency as a universal
property of living matter. So the smallest difference in the synthesis
conditions results in a great diversity of synthesized organic products.
We would like to extrapolate the scattering matrix study of paprin,
gaprin, and mushroom spores to organic matter functioning in a dispersed
multilevel architecture soil system. There is a need for discussing
the possibility of wider use of the presented results in an example
of soil as the most important and most complicated arena of organic
synthesis. Organic synthesis in the biosphere is closely linked to
biodegradation. This is a fresh organic and mineral–matter
source for soil biota and plants. Currently, the field of artificial
humic substance synthesis is focused on the fresh active organic matter
synthesis out of the soil and the subsequent application of the synthesized
matter to soil for soil organic matter stimulation.[56] Functioning of the humic substances and other organic substances
in soil is currently limited because the mechanical structure and
architecture of soil is not suitable for organic chemical synthesis.
The question of how the soil continuum is arranged as a zone of reactions
between humic substances and the soil is not discussed, and this not
a proper approach. Mechanical surrounding in standard soil strongly
limits the field of soil organic matter synthesis. Thus, the influence
of humic substances, directly and on stimulation, on the soil organic
matter regime is not studied on a large scale. Soil organic matter
synthesis restriction is linked to the high-level dead-end soil porosity
of around 98–99%.[21] This phenomenon
is inherent in the natural soil, especially in the agricultural soil.
The dead-end soil porosity has been studied quantitatively by a direct
physical method using Roentgen tomography.[20,21] The standard soil mechanical structure, architecture, and dead-end
porosity lead to excessive irreversible organic matter particulation
on the internal interface of the soil and into soil microaggregates.[57−60] In real soil, after precipitation or irrigation, the soil is excessively
moisturized. The soil structure and architecture degrade. In this
dispersed mass, the fresh organic matter freely enters the appropriate
positions in organic and mineral–matter complexes and soil
microaggregates. Thus, a fresh organic matter is excessively excluded
from the soil biological process and is lost in vain. Current outdated
agrarian technology restricts the soil organic matter turnover. The
humic substances functioning in the soil are supposed to have an influence
on the media as a chemical agent. Improved soil structure and architecture
are important for a better effect of nanoparticles on crops and soil
microbial communities as well for many other soil management applications.[61]Physical methods for studying the longitudinal
to transverse size
ratio of organic matter particles in real soil is a promising field
for better understanding of the ways of organic matter management
into the multilevel mechanical carcass systems.[3,8,11−13,15] Important issues are the nanoparticle biomolecular interactions
and adsorption in the soil, which provide uncertainty of complex biological
media.[9,10]Restrictions of organic matter synthesis
in soil can be characterized
by comparing the organic matter degradation in soil and in the colon
of a living creature. The productivity of the biological process in
the colon is manifold higher than that in soil.[29,30,33] Soil improvement is needed for organic matter
degradation and synthesis. This will provide a higher organic matter
turnover rate and higher soil biological production. This is important
as a promising way to maintain the global biogeochemical cycle and
obtain natural products originating via photosynthesis rather than
the current organic matter synthesis in artificial media. There are
promising methods to characterize soil biological processes in soil
and other linked soil properties using the term “soil health”.
But the number of soil health criteria is huge. Moreover, different
authors propose different criteria.[36] We
think that a quantitative physical approach will be highly productive
for obtaining most valuable soil health criteria, focusing on the
soil mechanical structure, architecture, and dead-end porosity as
conditions for the soil organic matter structural physical characteristics
and turnover. This approach is promising with a focus on the BGT*
possibilities for soil structure, architecture, and dead-end porosity
management and long-term control.[19,59] New design
of the soil continuum ensures first highly intensive degradation of
organic matter, followed by the synthesis of fresh organic matter.
The BGT* robotic system ensures well-dosed intra-soil pulse continuous–discrete
water and matter supply directly to the rhizosphere (Figure ).[51] This kind of watering of the soil is sufficient for plant and biota
nutrition. This well-controlled and rather low-dosage watering excludes
the over-moistening stage of soil, which is typical for both standard
rainfed agriculture and irrigation. In the case discussed, the soil
water regime type is closely related to the plant organogenesis. At
the same time, the soil continuum remains stable under the intra-soil
pulse continuous–discrete
watering in the absence of over-moistening. Moreover, intra-soil pulse
continuous–discrete watering is safe and improves the soil
structure and architecture. Natural aggregates and newly formed quasi-crystals
and corresponding quasi-aggregates in soil are not degraded. Soil
quasi-crystals are a product of the freshly synthesized organic matter
and soil mineral–matter interactions.[52] The soil structure and architecture suits plant organogenesis. Low
water supply to the soil helps achieving the goal of overcoming global
water scarcity.[35] The BGT* methodology
ensures environmentally safe organic and mineral waste recycling.[53,54] It is also capable of transforming the soil into a more stable highly
productive organic chemical bioreactor, providing the soil regime
and evolution conditions closer to those required for the functioning
of the colon of a living organism. BGT* ensures higher efficacy of
HS and nanoparticles and higher certainty of nanoparticle biomolecular
interactions and adsorption in complex biological media.[9,10,22,23,28,29,42]The BGT* approach (Figure ) provides better prerequisites for the organogenesis
and
productivity of plant at a high rate.[24,25] We propose
to use this condition as a soil health criterion.[33,35−37] There are possibilities of new physical studies of
organic matter synthesis and evolution in the newly designed porous
media soil continuum. This will help in overcoming the current conflict
between the biosphere and agro-ecosystem.[62] A new possibility will be opened to study the higher resistivity
of plants to pathogens and pathogen suppression.[38] The scattering matrix measuring block will be an important
diagnostic and control tool for the robotic system operation. The
system will provide control over the soil physical structure, which
has an influence on the origin of the organic matter, its scattering,
and proper functioning.[1]
Study Implications and Outlook
Studies of aqueous suspensions
of PVC (paprine and haprin) and
mushroom spores, including experimental measurements and theoretical
modeling of light scattering matrices, allowed us to conclude that
two types of scattering matrix-based identification are possible for
a dispersed organic medium.First, with a known (controlled)
dispersed composition of the suspension,
particles of different matters can be reliably identified due to the
difference in the refractive index by comparing the angular profiles
of their scattering matrix elements (Figure ), even when the refractive indices are close
(Figure ). Second,
if the refractive indices of the particles that are supposed to be
present in the suspension are known, then the angular dependences
of the scattering matrix make it possible to determine the disperse
composition (particle size distribution) with good accuracy, as shown
in the example of multicomponent Lycoperdon spore suspension (Figure ). Furthermore, the
presence and number of particles of interest in the tested soil sample
(transformed to a suspended form) can be identified by their characteristic
size in the size distribution histogram. In this way, the presence
of inorganic components such as nanoparticles added to the soil via
BGT* methods can also be monitored. In addition, this technique can
be used to detect agglomerates formed in the process of collective
interaction of nanoparticles with bioorganic components in the soil.[63]It should be noted that when the scattering
matrix is detected
directly from the soil, identification will be difficult (at least
if the measurement is made at only one wavelength) due to non-single
scattering. Therefore, the measurement procedure must include some
sample preparation; in our case, it was the preparation of an aqueous
suspension, in which the particles of interest were suspended at a
concentration corresponding to a single scattering. In addition, to
control the dispersed composition of the suspension, some filtration
methods should obviously be applied.The proposed diagnostic
methodology of dispersed organic materials
based on the scattering matrix can enhance the BGT* transcendental
possibilities to ensure the suitability of soil as an arena of biodegradation
and organic synthesis and a biological driver of the biosphere stability
and climate system certainty.[64] A robotic
system for intra-soil pulse continuous−discrete water and matter
supply directly to the rhizosphere is capable of transforming the
soil into a more stable highly productive organic chemical bioreactor,
providing controlled nanoparticle biomolecular interactions and adsorption
in complex biological media. Further studies on the scattering matrix
as a tool for disperse composition determination in the framework
of the BGT* methodology are of high importance.
Experimental
Section and Computational Methods
Quantitative techniques
and models of the dispersed medium studies
were considered in this research.[6−16,65,66]Aqueous suspensions of fodder yeast (PVC), paprin (grown on
paraffin
oil), and gaprin (grown on natural gas), as well as mushroom spores,
were studied by the following methodology. The PVC suspensions obtained
after mixing of the powders with water were filtered through a paper
filter. To obtain a uniform dispersion, the spores were mixed with
water using ultrasonication, which in particular led to a significant
increase in the number of individual spore organelles in the dispersion.
White light microphotographs of the powders were made on a substrate
in an air atmosphere. A laser phase microscope, which displays a 2D
distribution of the OPD in a plane transverse to the laser beam, was
used to measure the refractive index of dispersed submicron particles.[67]The light scattering matrices of the suspensions
were measured
using a laser polarimeter in a scattering angle range from 20 to 150°.[68] A single-mode He–Ne laser with a wavelength
of 0.63 μm and a power of 7 mW was used as a radiation source.
Measurements could not be carried out at the scattering angles less
than 20° and greater than 150° due to laser radiation blocking
by the photo-receiving part of the setup. The reliability of the matrix
element experimental dependence on the scattering angle θ was
restricted by the measurement error of f (i,j = 1,...,4), denoting the
matrix elements F normalized
to F11 (f = F/F11).[45] The measurement error of F11(θ) was
assessed as acceptable when its value was inside the experimental
point size frame (Figure ). The corresponding error was about 0.03 for the normalized
matrix elements f.
Authors: Hussain Masoom; Denis Courtier-Murias; Hashim Farooq; Ronald Soong; Brian P Kelleher; Chao Zhang; Werner E Maas; Michael Fey; Rajeev Kumar; Martine Monette; Henry J Stronks; Myrna J Simpson; André J Simpson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Sergio Dominguez-Medina; Lydia Kisley; Lawrence J Tauzin; Anneli Hoggard; Bo Shuang; A Swarnapali D S Indrasekara; Sishan Chen; Lin-Yung Wang; Paul J Derry; Anton Liopo; Eugene R Zubarev; Christy F Landes; Stephan Link Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Klemen Strojan; Adrijana Leonardi; Vladimir B Bregar; Igor Križaj; Jurij Svete; Mojca Pavlin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander Swidsinski; Yvonne Dörffel; Vera Loening-Baucke; Christoph Gille; Anne Reißhauer; Onder Göktas; Monika Krüger; Jürgen Neuhaus; Wieland Schrödl Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Sergey V Gudkov; Georgy A Shafeev; Alexey P Glinushkin; Alexey V Shkirin; Ekaterina V Barmina; Ignat I Rakov; Alexander V Simakin; Anatoly V Kislov; Maxim E Astashev; Vladimir A Vodeneev; Valery P Kalinitchenko Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2020-07-10
Authors: Valery P Kalinitchenko; Alexey P Glinushkin; Tatiana M Minkina; Saglara S Mandzhieva; Svetlana N Sushkova; Vladimir A Sukovatov; Ljudmila P Il'ina; Dmitry A Makarenkov Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2020-07-07