| Literature DB >> 33402778 |
Amrita More1, Anoop Sivakumar1, Gupta K Gaurav1.
Abstract
Large upper central chest wall defects are a reconstructive challenge. The commonly described flaps for this area do not provide very large skin paddle, and free tissue transfer remains the only option for large skin defects. Supraclavicular flap as a local flap is widely used for head and neck reconstruction and has been described for upper chest wall defects earlier. We have used nonislanded supraclavicular flap for reconstruction of two cases of large chest wall defects, which would otherwise need free tissue transfer, single flap in one case and bilateral flaps in the other. It is easy to do and has minimal morbidity. Supraclavicular flap offers a simple solution for large skin defects of the upper central chest wall and is especially useful in patients with high-operative risk and guarded prognosis. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Keywords: pedicle flap; supraclavicular flap; upper central chest wall reconstruction
Year: 2020 PMID: 33402778 PMCID: PMC7775245 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Plast Surg ISSN: 0970-0358
Fig. 1Preoperative image of Case 1 showing dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans overlying manubrium sternum
Fig. 2Preoperative planning of island flap with surface markings of landmarks of the triangle enclosing the origin of the supraclavicular artery denoted by *, later changed intraoperatively.
Fig. 3( a ) Postwide local excision defect of size 12 cm longitudinally × 15 cm transversely. Supraclavicular flap of 16 × 6 cm marked. A denotes the pivot point of the flap and A’ denotes the point where the flap and defect margin meet. ( b ) Flap after inset. Point A sutured to point A’.
Fig. 46 months postoperative image of Case 1 showing hypertrophic (black arrow) and widened scars (asterisks).
Fig. 5Preoperative image of Case 2 showing large recurrent Ewing’s sarcoma and overlying scar of previous surgical resection
Fig. 6( a ) Postwide local excision defect of size 18 cm longitudinally × 24 cm transversely. ( b ) Bilateral marking of plan of 15 × 7cm supraclavicular flaps. ( c ) Intraoperative image showing first flap inset
Fig. 7Immediate postoperative image.