Literature DB >> 33402428

Views of disability rights organisations on assisted dying legislation in England, Wales and Scotland: an analysis of position statements.

Graham Box1, Kenneth Chambaere2.   

Abstract

Assisted dying is a divisive and controversial topic and it is therefore desirable that a broad range of interests inform any proposed policy changes. The purpose of this study is to collect and synthesize the views of an important stakeholder group-namely people with disabilities (PwD)-as expressed by disability rights organisations (DROs) in Great Britain. Parliamentary consultations were reviewed, together with an examination of the contemporary positions of a wide range of DROs. Our analysis revealed that the vast majority do not have a clear public stance; those that do exhibit a significant diversity of opinion. DROs opposing legislation on assisted dying have argued that it would be premature, misguided, inequitable and culturally undesirable. Some specify conditions that would have to be satisfied before they could support legalisation, such as radical improvements in health and social care services (especially those relating to end of life care) and the elimination of discrimination against PwD. DROs supporting assisted dying maintain that a change in the law would promote autonomy, end intense suffering, can be delivered safely and is supported by the DRO's membership. The discussion considers the reasons why several DROs adopt a neutral stance and the argument is made that, whatever their overarching stance on the issue, DROs need to be involved in the policy debate so that the crucial perspectives of PwD are heard and addressed. This is an important message for countries around the world that permit, or are considering legalising, assisted dying. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted dying; assisted suicide; disability; euthanasia; public law; public policy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402428     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Why and how the work of Motor Neurone Disease Associations matters before and during bereavement: a consumer perspective.

Authors:  Samar M Aoun; Paul A Cafarella; Anne Hogden; Geoff Thomas; Leanne Jiang; Robert Edis
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Disability-based arguments against assisted dying laws.

Authors:  Ben Colburn
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.512

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.