Iñaki Odriozola1, Nerea Abrego2, Vojtěch Tláskal3, Petra Zrůstová3, Daniel Morais3, Tomáš Větrovský3, Otso Ovaskainen4, Petr Baldrian3. 1. Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic inaki.odriozola@biomed.cas.cz. 2. Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. 4. Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
Fungal-bacterial interactions play a key role in the functioning of many ecosystems. Thus, understanding their interactive dynamics is of central importance for gaining predictive knowledge on ecosystem functioning. However, it is challenging to disentangle the mechanisms behind species associations from observed co-occurrence patterns, and little is known about the directionality of such interactions. Here, we applied joint species distribution modeling to high-throughput sequencing data on co-occurring fungal and bacterial communities in deadwood to ask whether fungal and bacterial co-occurrences result from shared habitat use (i.e., deadwood's properties) or whether there are fungal-bacterial interactive associations after habitat characteristics are taken into account. Moreover, we tested the hypothesis that the interactions are mainly modulated through fungal communities influencing bacterial communities. For that, we quantified how much the predictive power of the joint species distribution models for bacterial and fungal community improved when accounting for the other community. Our results show that fungi and bacteria form tight association networks (i.e., some species pairs co-occur more frequently and other species pairs co-occur less frequently than expected by chance) in deadwood that include common (or opposite) responses to the environment as well as (potentially) biotic interactions. Additionally, we show that information about the fungal occurrences and abundances increased the power to predict the bacterial abundances substantially, whereas information about the bacterial occurrences and abundances increased the power to predict the fungal abundances much less. Our results suggest that fungal communities may mainly affect bacteria in deadwood.IMPORTANCE Understanding the interactive dynamics between fungal and bacterial communities is important to gain predictive knowledge on ecosystem functioning. However, little is known about the mechanisms behind fungal-bacterial associations and the directionality of species interactions. Applying joint species distribution modeling to high-throughput sequencing data on co-occurring fungal-bacterial communities in deadwood, we found evidence that nonrandom fungal-bacterial associations derive from shared habitat use as well as (potentially) biotic interactions. Importantly, the combination of cross-validations and conditional cross-validations helped us to answer the question about the directionality of the biotic interactions, providing evidence that suggests that fungal communities may mainly affect bacteria in deadwood. Our modeling approach may help gain insight into the directionality of interactions between different components of the microbiome in other environments.
Fungal-bacterial interactions play a key role in the functioning of many ecosystems. Thus, understanding their interactive dynamics is of central importance for gaining predictive knowledge on ecosystem functioning. However, it is challenging to disentangle the mechanisms behind species associations from observed co-occurrence patterns, and little is known about the directionality of such interactions. Here, we applied joint species distribution modeling to high-throughput sequencing data on co-occurring fungal and bacterial communities in deadwood to ask whether fungal and bacterial co-occurrences result from shared habitat use (i.e., deadwood's properties) or whether there are fungal-bacterial interactive associations after habitat characteristics are taken into account. Moreover, we tested the hypothesis that the interactions are mainly modulated through fungal communities influencing bacterial communities. For that, we quantified how much the predictive power of the joint species distribution models for bacterial and fungal community improved when accounting for the other community. Our results show that fungi and bacteria form tight association networks (i.e., some species pairs co-occur more frequently and other species pairs co-occur less frequently than expected by chance) in deadwood that include common (or opposite) responses to the environment as well as (potentially) biotic interactions. Additionally, we show that information about the fungal occurrences and abundances increased the power to predict the bacterial abundances substantially, whereas information about the bacterial occurrences and abundances increased the power to predict the fungal abundances much less. Our results suggest that fungal communities may mainly affect bacteria in deadwood.IMpan class="Chemical">PORTANCE Understanding the interactive dynamics between fungal and bacterial communities is important to gain predictive knowledge on ecosystem functioning. However, little is known about the mechanisms behind fungal-bacterial associations and the directionality of species interactions. Applying joint species distribution modeling to high-throughput sequencing data on co-occurring fungal-bacterial communities in deadwood, we found evidence that nonrandom fungal-bacterial associations derive from shared habitat use as well as (potentially) biotic interactions. Importantly, the combination of cross-validations and conditional cross-validations helped us to answer the question about the directionality of the biotic interactions, providing evidence that suggests that fungal communities may mainly affect bacteria in deadwood. Our modeling approach may help gain insight into the directionality of interactions between different components of the microbiome in other environments.
Authors: Katarina Ihrmark; Inga T M Bödeker; Karelyn Cruz-Martinez; Hanna Friberg; Ariana Kubartova; Jessica Schenck; Ylva Strid; Jan Stenlid; Mikael Brandström-Durling; Karina E Clemmensen; Björn D Lindahl Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; Catherine A Lozupone; Peter J Turnbaugh; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Urmas Kõljalg; R Henrik Nilsson; Kessy Abarenkov; Leho Tedersoo; Andy F S Taylor; Mohammad Bahram; Scott T Bates; Thomas D Bruns; Johan Bengtsson-Palme; Tony M Callaghan; Brian Douglas; Tiia Drenkhan; Ursula Eberhardt; Margarita Dueñas; Tine Grebenc; Gareth W Griffith; Martin Hartmann; Paul M Kirk; Petr Kohout; Ellen Larsson; Björn D Lindahl; Robert Lücking; María P Martín; P Brandon Matheny; Nhu H Nguyen; Tuula Niskanen; Jane Oja; Kabir G Peay; Ursula Peintner; Marko Peterson; Kadri Põldmaa; Lauri Saag; Irja Saar; Arthur Schüßler; James A Scott; Carolina Senés; Matthew E Smith; Ave Suija; D Lee Taylor; M Teresa Telleria; Michael Weiss; Karl-Henrik Larsson Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Vendula Valásková; Wietse de Boer; Paulien J A Klein Gunnewiek; Martin Pospísek; Petr Baldrian Journal: ISME J Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Wietse de Boer; Anne-Marieke Wagenaar; Paulien J A Klein Gunnewiek; Johannes A van Veen Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Anna M Kielak; Tanja R Scheublin; Lucas W Mendes; Johannes A van Veen; Eiko E Kuramae Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Vojtěch Tláskal; Vendula Brabcová; Tomáš Větrovský; Rubén López-Mondéjar; Lummy Maria Oliveira Monteiro; João Pedro Saraiva; Ulisses Nunes da Rocha; Petr Baldrian Journal: Sci Data Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 6.444