Sara Bhatti1, Jennifer Rayner2,3,4, Andrew D Pinto4,5,6,7, Kate Mulligan2,4, Donald C Cole4,8. 1. Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Canada sara.bhatti@allianceON.org. 2. Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Canada. 3. Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, Canada. 4. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. Upstream Lab, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 7. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 8. South East Grey Community Health Centre, Dundalk, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) assists patients to engage in social activities and connect to community supports as part of a holistic approach to primary care. Rx: Community was a SP project, which was implemented within 11 community health centres (CHCs) situated across Ontario, Canada. AIM: To explore how SP as a process facilitates positive outcomes for patients. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative methods were used. Eighteen focus groups were conducted at CHCs or by video-conferencing, and involved 88 patients. In addition, eight in-depth telephone interviews were undertaken. METHOD: Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using a theoretical framework based on self-determination theory (SDT). RESULTS: Participants who had received social prescriptions described SP as an empathetic process that respects their needs and interests. SP facilitated the patient's voice in their care, helped patients to develop skills in addressing needs important to them, and fostered trusting relationships with staff and other participants. Patients reported their social support networks were expanded, and they had improved mental health and ability in self-management of chronic conditions. Patients who became involved in SP as voluntary 'health champions' reported this was a positive experience and they gained a sense of purpose by giving back to their communities in ways that felt meaningful for them. CONCLUSION: SP produced positive outcomes for patients, and it fits well within the community health centre model of primary care. Future research should examine the impact on health outcomes and examine the return on investment of developing and implementing SP programmes.
BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) assists patients to engage in social activities and connect to community supports as part of a holistic approach to primary care. Rx: Community was a SP project, which was implemented within 11 community health centres (CHCs) situated across Ontario, Canada. AIM: To explore how SP as a process facilitates positive outcomes for patients. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative methods were used. Eighteen focus groups were conducted at CHCs or by video-conferencing, and involved 88 patients. In addition, eight in-depth telephone interviews were undertaken. METHOD: Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using a theoretical framework based on self-determination theory (SDT). RESULTS:Participants who had received social prescriptions described SP as an empathetic process that respects their needs and interests. SP facilitated the patient's voice in their care, helped patients to develop skills in addressing needs important to them, and fostered trusting relationships with staff and other participants. Patients reported their social support networks were expanded, and they had improved mental health and ability in self-management of chronic conditions. Patients who became involved in SP as voluntary 'health champions' reported this was a positive experience and they gained a sense of purpose by giving back to their communities in ways that felt meaningful for them. CONCLUSION:SP produced positive outcomes for patients, and it fits well within the community health centre model of primary care. Future research should examine the impact on health outcomes and examine the return on investment of developing and implementing SP programmes.
Authors: Azza Eissa; Robyn Rowe; Andrew Pinto; George N Okoli; Kendall M Campbell; Judy C Washington; José E Rodríguez Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Daniel F Morse; Sahil Sandhu; Kate Mulligan; Stephanie Tierney; Marie Polley; Bogdan Chiva Giurca; Siân Slade; Sónia Dias; Kamal R Mahtani; Leanne Wells; Huali Wang; Bo Zhao; Cristiano Emanuel Marta De Figueiredo; Jan Joost Meijs; Hae Kweun Nam; Kheng Hock Lee; Carolyn Wallace; Megan Elliott; Juan Manuel Mendive; David Robinson; Miia Palo; Wolfram Herrmann; Rasmus Østergaard Nielsen; Kerryn Husk Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2022-05
Authors: Chris G Buse; Sandra Allison; Donald C Cole; Raina Fumerton; Margot Winifred Parkes; Robert F Woollard Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-05-26