Literature DB >> 33402190

Experimental crossover study on the effects of withholding feed for 24 h on the equine faecal bacterial microbiota in healthy mares.

Jaclyn A Willette1,2, Dipti Pitta1, Nagaraju Indugu1, Bonnie Vecchiarelli1, Meagan L Hennessy1, Tamara Dobbie1, Louise L Southwood3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between equine gastrointestinal disease causing colic signs and changes in faecal bacterial microbiota has been identified. The reasons for these changes and their clinical relevance has not been investigated. Withholding feed, which is an integral part of managing horses with colic, may contribute to the observed changes in the microbiota and impact interpretation of findings in horses with colic. Study objectives were, therefore, to determine the effect of withholding feed for 24 h on equine faecal bacterial microbiota in healthy mares to differentiate the effects of withholding feed from the changes potentially associated with the disease.
RESULTS: Species richness and Shannon diversity (alpha diversity) were significantly lower at the late withheld (10-24 h post withholding feed) and early refed (2-12 h post re-feeding) time points compared to samples from fed horses (P < 0.01). Restoration of species richness and diversity began to occur at the late refed (18-24 h post re-feeding) time points. Horses having feed withheld had a distinct bacterial population compared to fed horses (beta diversity). Bacteroidetes BS11 and Firmicutes Christensenellaceae, Christensenella, and Dehalobacteriaceae were significantly increased in horses withheld from feed primarily during the late withheld and early refed time points. Bacteroidetes Marinilabiaceae and Prevotellaceae, Firmicutes Veillonellaceae, Anaerovibrio, and Bulleidia, and Proteobacteria GMD14H09 were significantly decreased in horses with feed withheld at late withheld, early refed, and late refed time periods (P < 0.01). Changes in commensal gut microbiota were not significant between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Withholding feed has a significant effect on faecal bacterial microbiota diversity and composition particularly following at least 10 h of withholding feed and should be taken into consideration when interpreting data on the equine faecal bacterial microbiota in horses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colic; Equine; Gastrointestinal; Microbiota

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402190      PMCID: PMC7786913          DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02706-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Vet Res        ISSN: 1746-6148            Impact factor:   2.741


  39 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile carriage in elderly subjects and associated changes in the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Mary C Rea; Orla O'Sullivan; Fergus Shanahan; Paul W O'Toole; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Unique and shared responses of the gut microbiota to prolonged fasting: a comparative study across five classes of vertebrate hosts.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl; James Amaya; Celeste A Passement; M Denise Dearing; Marshall D McCue
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.

Authors:  J S Weese; S J Holcombe; R M Embertson; K A Kurtz; H A Roessner; M Jalali; S E Wismer
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Response of germfree, conventional, conventionalized and E. coli monocontaminated mice to starvation.

Authors:  B Tennant; O J Malm; R E Horowitz; S M Levenson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Clinical and intestinal histologic features of horses treated for recurrent colic: 66 cases (2006-2015).

Authors:  Holly L Stewart; Julie B Engiles; Darko Stefanovski; Louise Southwood
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Human genetics shape the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Julia K Goodrich; Jillian L Waters; Angela C Poole; Jessica L Sutter; Omry Koren; Ran Blekhman; Michelle Beaumont; William Van Treuren; Rob Knight; Jordana T Bell; Timothy D Spector; Andrew G Clark; Ruth E Ley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Alexander Khoruts; Johan Dicksved; Janet K Jansson; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Differences in the equine faecal microbiota between horses presenting to a tertiary referral hospital for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure.

Authors:  H L Stewart; L L Southwood; N Indugu; B Vecchiarelli; J B Engiles; D Pitta
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Effects of short-term fasting on in vivo rumen microbiota and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics.

Authors:  Jong Nam Kim; Jaeyong Song; Eun Joong Kim; Jongsoo Chang; Chang-Hyun Kim; Seongwon Seo; Moon Baek Chang; Gui-Seck Bae
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.