Literature DB >> 33402149

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders.

Line Wisting1, Sverre Urnes Johnson2,3, Cynthia M Bulik4,5,6, Ole A Andreassen7, Øyvind Rø8,9, Lasse Bang8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internationally, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is commonly used to assess the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms. However, psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 have only been assessed in adolescents. We present normative data for women and an evaluation of the psychometric properties (internal consistency, convergent validity, and factor structure) of the Norwegian PHQ-9 among women with and without eating disorders (ED).
METHODS: In this case-control study, a total of 793 females aged 18-78 years (mean 30.39; SD 9.83) completed an online self-report assessment. Measures included the ED100K and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) to assess ED psychopathology, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) scale and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) to assess symptoms of anxiety and emotion regulation deficits. Participants were categorized into three groups, i.e., previous ED (19.7%, n = 148), current ED (36.3%, n = 272), and no history of ED (44.0%, n = 330), based on self-reported scores on the ED 100 K and the EDE-Q.
RESULTS: Mean PHQ-9 total score for those with a previous history of ED was 10.67 (SD 6.33), for those with a current ED 16.61 (SD 5.84), and for those with no lifetime history of ED 6.83 (SD 5.58). Excellent internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach's alpha's for individuals with a previous ED (.88), for individuals with a current ED (.86), and for individuals with no history of ED (.88). Acceptable convergent validity was indicated based on significant correlations between the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and DERS-SF. Confirmatory Factor Analyses revealed a mediocre fit for a one-factor structure of the PHQ-9, regardless of diagnostic status.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 are acceptable across females with and without ED, and the PHQ-9 can be recommended for use in clinical ED settings and for people without mental disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Depression; Eating disorders; Psychology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402149      PMCID: PMC7786911          DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychiatry        ISSN: 1471-244X            Impact factor:   3.630


  40 in total

1.  Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality.

Authors:  Carol M Woods; Thomas F Oltmanns; Eric Turkheimer
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2009

2.  Construct validity and factor structure of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale among adults with severe mental illness.

Authors:  J Christopher Fowler; Ruby Charak; Jon D Elhai; Jon G Allen; B Christopher Frueh; John M Oldham
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 3.  Depression and anxiety in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Neuendorf; Aubrey Harding; Noelle Stello; Douglas Hanes; Helané Wahbeh
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Factor structure and construct validity of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire in college students: further support for a modified brief version.

Authors:  Carlos M Grilo; Deborah L Reas; Christopher J Hopwood; Ross D Crosby
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Emotion Regulation as a Transdiagnostic Feature Among Eating Disorders: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Approach.

Authors:  Núria Mallorquí-Bagué; Cristina Vintró-Alcaraz; Isabel Sánchez; Nadine Riesco; Zaida Agüera; Roser Granero; Susana Jiménez-Múrcia; José M Menchón; Janet Treasure; Fernando Fernández-Aranda
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2017-11-23

6.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; K Kroenke; J B Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Mood disorders in eating disorder patients: Prevalence and chronology of ONSET.

Authors:  N Godart; L Radon; F Curt; J Duclos; F Perdereau; F Lang; J L Venisse; O Halfon; P Bizouard; G Loas; M Corcos; Ph Jeammet; M F Flament
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  The factor structure of the eating disorder examination in clinical and community samples.

Authors:  Susan M Byrne; Karina L Allen; Amy M Lampard; Emma R Dove; Anthea Fursland
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the longitudinal relationship between eating pathology and depression.

Authors:  Francis Puccio; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Deborah Ong; Isabel Krug
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.861

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factor structure, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 in a Norwegian psychiatric outpatient sample.

Authors:  Martin Brattmyr; Martin Schevik Lindberg; Stian Solem; Odin Hjemdal; Audun Havnen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.144

2.  A self-guided Internet-delivered intervention for adults with ADHD: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robin Maria Francisca Kenter; Astri J Lundervold; Tine Nordgreen
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2021-11-20

3.  The Role of Emotion Regulation in Eating Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Jenni Leppanen; Dalia Brown; Hannah McLinden; Steven Williams; Kate Tchanturia
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.