Literature DB >> 33401870

Methods and Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Shu Nakamura1, Fjio Ito1, Zenya Ito1, Motohide Shibayama1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) is a procedure that includes the use of new devices, which allow minimally invasive diskectomy under the percutaneous full-endoscopic guidance and safe percutaneous insertion of a standard-sized cage. This procedure can be applied to severe disk degeneration, spondylolisthesis, and all lumbar intervertebral levels including the L5-S1 level. We report the methods and the clinical outcomes of this procedure.
METHODS: Percutaneous diskectomy was performed with an outer sheath cutter and other devices. A cage was inserted with an L-shaped retract-slider. Hybrid facet screw fixation was performed for severe disk degeneration without spondylolisthesis. Conventional percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was performed for spondylolisthesis. The subjects consisted of 21 patients, who underwent PELIF and were followed up for 1 year or longer.
RESULTS: No complications related to cage insertion were detected. The mean visual analogue scale scores were improved from 6.1 to 1.9 for lower back pain in severe disc degeneration cases without spondylolisthesis, and from 7.6 to 1.0 for lower extremity symptoms in spondylolisthesis cases.
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes were favorable. PELIF was found to be a minimally invasive method that did not compromise safety and efficiency. PELIF is a possible therapeutic option that should be considered for not only spondylolisthesis at various intervertebral levels but also for severe disk degeneration because of its minimal invasiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopes; Lumbar vertebrae; Spinal fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33401870     DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040302.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurospine        ISSN: 2586-6591


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect].

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Qingquan Kong; Limin Rong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  [Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Junlin Liu; Qingquan Kong; Pin Feng; Bin Zhang; Junsong Ma; Yuan Hu; Xi Wu; Xiang Shu; Congmin Pu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  A Narrative Review of Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Uniportal Facet-Preserving Trans-Kambin Endoscopic Fusion and Uniportal Facet-Sacrificing Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Pang Hung Wu; Koichi Sairyo; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.